Active Users:2337 Time:18/06/2026 03:36:14 AM
Hmm that's a tough one. beckstcw Send a noteboard - 11/02/2010 03:18:54 AM
I have no doubt that there are gay judges who could rule without bias, as well as straight judges who would be biased one way or another. I haven't been following the case very well, so I can't really comment other than to say that I'd hope he'd have the integrity to remove himself if he knew he couldn't rule fairly.
Reply to message
Prop 8 Judge, assigned case by random, turns out to be gay - 11/02/2010 12:13:46 AM 1177 Views
Re: Prop 8 Judge, assigned case by random, turns out to be gay *NM* - 11/02/2010 02:47:40 AM 418 Views
Hmm that's a tough one. - 11/02/2010 03:18:54 AM 714 Views
I am not questioning the judge ability to rule fairly. - 11/02/2010 04:21:16 AM 743 Views
I'm betting on 'Uphold', but his orientation probably won't effect the ruling either way - 11/02/2010 04:16:40 AM 718 Views
Why are you betting on Uphold? - 11/02/2010 04:22:03 AM 719 Views
California Supreme Court's ruling - 11/02/2010 05:42:35 AM 802 Views
This is federal court - 11/02/2010 02:22:58 PM 700 Views
Well, well, well, how the turn tables - 11/02/2010 05:00:56 AM 696 Views
Spin it DJ!!! *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:27:38 AM 289 Views
For what it's worth, I think he should recuse himself. - 11/02/2010 09:35:18 AM 733 Views
I should keep my nose out. - 11/02/2010 12:40:13 PM 770 Views
It doesn't automatically touch heterosexuals interests. - 11/02/2010 12:53:50 PM 755 Views
Yeah. - 11/02/2010 02:08:15 PM 716 Views
A lot of recusement is about self preservation, I think. - 15/02/2010 01:05:38 PM 736 Views
It was always going to be appealed. *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:50:45 PM 312 Views
He should recuse himself - 11/02/2010 02:41:24 PM 715 Views
Just for that I'm changing my mind! - 15/02/2010 01:07:29 PM 688 Views

Reply to Message