Active Users:2192 Time:18/06/2026 04:38:18 AM
Yes, but if he doesn't recuse it's guaranteed, whatever the outcome. Joel Send a noteboard - 15/02/2010 01:06:32 PM
Even if he upheld the ban people would say he only did it because he felt he had no choice due to his personal background.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Prop 8 Judge, assigned case by random, turns out to be gay - 11/02/2010 12:13:46 AM 1177 Views
Re: Prop 8 Judge, assigned case by random, turns out to be gay *NM* - 11/02/2010 02:47:40 AM 418 Views
Hmm that's a tough one. - 11/02/2010 03:18:54 AM 714 Views
I am not questioning the judge ability to rule fairly. - 11/02/2010 04:21:16 AM 743 Views
I'm betting on 'Uphold', but his orientation probably won't effect the ruling either way - 11/02/2010 04:16:40 AM 718 Views
Why are you betting on Uphold? - 11/02/2010 04:22:03 AM 719 Views
California Supreme Court's ruling - 11/02/2010 05:42:35 AM 802 Views
This is federal court - 11/02/2010 02:22:58 PM 700 Views
Well, well, well, how the turn tables - 11/02/2010 05:00:56 AM 696 Views
Spin it DJ!!! *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:27:38 AM 289 Views
For what it's worth, I think he should recuse himself. - 11/02/2010 09:35:18 AM 733 Views
I should keep my nose out. - 11/02/2010 12:40:13 PM 771 Views
It doesn't automatically touch heterosexuals interests. - 11/02/2010 12:53:50 PM 755 Views
Yeah. - 11/02/2010 02:08:15 PM 717 Views
A lot of recusement is about self preservation, I think. - 15/02/2010 01:05:38 PM 736 Views
It was always going to be appealed. *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:50:45 PM 312 Views
Yes, but if he doesn't recuse it's guaranteed, whatever the outcome. - 15/02/2010 01:06:32 PM 691 Views
He should recuse himself - 11/02/2010 02:41:24 PM 715 Views
Just for that I'm changing my mind! - 15/02/2010 01:07:29 PM 688 Views

Reply to Message