Considering one of the huge questions among archaeologists and classicists is "Who the hell are these people and where do they come from?!", I'm thinking this holds more promises than showing syphilis rates among Villanovan males.
Disclaimer that's longer than actual post: I'm aware that this is not an article written for classicists or archaeologists, that technically learning about genetic diseases could help show migration, that the vast majority of STDs, including syphilis, were unknown to the ancients, and that the Villanovans were a distinct group from the Etruscans, regardless of whether the latter was invasive or autochthonic. SO DON'T NITPICK.
Disclaimer that's longer than actual post: I'm aware that this is not an article written for classicists or archaeologists, that technically learning about genetic diseases could help show migration, that the vast majority of STDs, including syphilis, were unknown to the ancients, and that the Villanovans were a distinct group from the Etruscans, regardless of whether the latter was invasive or autochthonic. SO DON'T NITPICK.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
Hairs trace human history
- 14/02/2010 04:26:49 AM
682 Views
What genetic diseases afflicted the Etruscans? 
- 14/02/2010 05:33:17 AM
426 Views
- 14/02/2010 05:33:17 AM
426 Views