But from the viewpoint of fighting a war, the guy shooting at your convoy is by definition a bad guy.
And I think most of us recognize that dimension on a basic level; few would condone life imprisonment of enemy soldiers simply for BEING enemy soldiers, but that seems quite reasonable to me for proven terrorists. Another of the differences, in fact; armies will naturally try to liberate POW camps if practical, but the existence of POWs does not, in itself, become an additional cause for war, because all sides know POWs will ultimately be released after hostilities end.
It's really a pretty basic difference: The enemy soldier and the terrorist are both your foe, but one of them tries to stop you by killing you; the other is too cowardly for that and instead tries to murder your kids so you stop yourself. That's why Sgt. York got a medal and Lt. Calley got a court martial.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t.
- 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM
1890 Views
Lot of BS in there
- 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM
672 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this.
- 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM
617 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart.
- 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM
577 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety.
- 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM
596 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM*
- 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM
230 Views
I did note the rampant bias.
- 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM
679 Views
- 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM
679 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier...
- 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM
608 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers?
- 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM
740 Views
I would agree with this.
- 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM
661 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later.
- 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM
701 Views
- 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM
701 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions"
- 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM
574 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe.
- 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM
561 Views
I think you missed the point.
- 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM
572 Views
One of us did.
- 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM
754 Views
- 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM
754 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY
- 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM
586 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally.
- 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM
631 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC
- 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM
768 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason.
- 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM
718 Views
WTF? Are these people serious?
- 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM
616 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM*
- 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM
229 Views
So I presume the article meant to highlight that Muslim American citizens aren't all that violent?
- 03/02/2010 04:17:06 AM
645 Views
How many other attacks killed almost 3,000 people of over 90 different nations?
- 03/02/2010 06:26:23 AM
657 Views
