Active Users:1289 Time:18/10/2025 10:08:34 PM
Yes, but if he doesn't recuse it's guaranteed, whatever the outcome. Joel Send a noteboard - 15/02/2010 01:06:32 PM
Even if he upheld the ban people would say he only did it because he felt he had no choice due to his personal background.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Prop 8 Judge, assigned case by random, turns out to be gay - 11/02/2010 12:13:46 AM 1022 Views
Re: Prop 8 Judge, assigned case by random, turns out to be gay *NM* - 11/02/2010 02:47:40 AM 345 Views
Hmm that's a tough one. - 11/02/2010 03:18:54 AM 602 Views
I am not questioning the judge ability to rule fairly. - 11/02/2010 04:21:16 AM 610 Views
I'm betting on 'Uphold', but his orientation probably won't effect the ruling either way - 11/02/2010 04:16:40 AM 586 Views
Why are you betting on Uphold? - 11/02/2010 04:22:03 AM 583 Views
California Supreme Court's ruling - 11/02/2010 05:42:35 AM 663 Views
This is federal court - 11/02/2010 02:22:58 PM 576 Views
Well, well, well, how the turn tables - 11/02/2010 05:00:56 AM 572 Views
Spin it DJ!!! *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:27:38 AM 227 Views
For what it's worth, I think he should recuse himself. - 11/02/2010 09:35:18 AM 603 Views
I should keep my nose out. - 11/02/2010 12:40:13 PM 629 Views
It doesn't automatically touch heterosexuals interests. - 11/02/2010 12:53:50 PM 612 Views
Yeah. - 11/02/2010 02:08:15 PM 577 Views
A lot of recusement is about self preservation, I think. - 15/02/2010 01:05:38 PM 591 Views
It was always going to be appealed. *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:50:45 PM 244 Views
Yes, but if he doesn't recuse it's guaranteed, whatever the outcome. - 15/02/2010 01:06:32 PM 563 Views
He should recuse himself - 11/02/2010 02:41:24 PM 579 Views
Just for that I'm changing my mind! - 15/02/2010 01:07:29 PM 552 Views

Reply to Message