Active Users:742 Time:14/12/2025 02:06:56 AM
Yes, but if he doesn't recuse it's guaranteed, whatever the outcome. Joel Send a noteboard - 15/02/2010 01:06:32 PM
Even if he upheld the ban people would say he only did it because he felt he had no choice due to his personal background.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Prop 8 Judge, assigned case by random, turns out to be gay - 11/02/2010 12:13:46 AM 1070 Views
Re: Prop 8 Judge, assigned case by random, turns out to be gay *NM* - 11/02/2010 02:47:40 AM 367 Views
Hmm that's a tough one. - 11/02/2010 03:18:54 AM 631 Views
I am not questioning the judge ability to rule fairly. - 11/02/2010 04:21:16 AM 656 Views
I'm betting on 'Uphold', but his orientation probably won't effect the ruling either way - 11/02/2010 04:16:40 AM 624 Views
Why are you betting on Uphold? - 11/02/2010 04:22:03 AM 626 Views
California Supreme Court's ruling - 11/02/2010 05:42:35 AM 707 Views
This is federal court - 11/02/2010 02:22:58 PM 620 Views
Well, well, well, how the turn tables - 11/02/2010 05:00:56 AM 614 Views
Spin it DJ!!! *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:27:38 AM 250 Views
For what it's worth, I think he should recuse himself. - 11/02/2010 09:35:18 AM 646 Views
I should keep my nose out. - 11/02/2010 12:40:13 PM 674 Views
It doesn't automatically touch heterosexuals interests. - 11/02/2010 12:53:50 PM 655 Views
Yeah. - 11/02/2010 02:08:15 PM 625 Views
A lot of recusement is about self preservation, I think. - 15/02/2010 01:05:38 PM 643 Views
It was always going to be appealed. *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:50:45 PM 268 Views
Yes, but if he doesn't recuse it's guaranteed, whatever the outcome. - 15/02/2010 01:06:32 PM 613 Views
He should recuse himself - 11/02/2010 02:41:24 PM 621 Views
Just for that I'm changing my mind! - 15/02/2010 01:07:29 PM 594 Views

Reply to Message