Active Users:618 Time:10/06/2026 06:06:40 AM
Why? It's the woman's body, she has the right to decide how to apportion her biological resources. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 05/03/2010 06:56:44 PM

And all countries need to raise the value of girls. They should encourage female education; abolish laws and customs that prevent daughters inheriting property; make examples of hospitals and clinics with impossible sex ratios; get women engaged in public life—using everything from television newsreaders to women traffic police. Mao Zedong said “women hold up half the sky.” The world needs to do more to prevent a gendercide that will have the sky crashing down.
Hey, I know! Instead of outlawing murder, why don't we teach everyone to understand how other people feel, and to appreciate their perspective, and how bad it is to lose them. What a completely retarded article. How are you supposed to "raise the value of girls" without completely going after the entire set of cultural mores? No economic or social policy can do this - there is currently a surfiet of other available workers, and men are almost universally more desirable employees. There is a reason why in free markets, they make $1.00 for every $.65 a woman earns. This, of course, is nothing knew to pro-lifers. They have been thoroughly aware of this scenario, and have been complaining about it for decades.
This is completely absurd. There are only two acceptable positions on the abortion debate, and they center around your acceptance of a fetus as a human life. If it is, there is absolutely no justification for a deliberately induced abortion, ever. If it is not a human life, then these complaints are ridiculous. Chinese women have every bit as much right to not waste time and resources on a relatively useless product of their bodies, as Western women do to not waste their youth or career-advancing years on a similarly unwanted pregnancy. Because one aborts for reasons of personal suitability and another does it because of cultural gender issues does not alter the underlying principle.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
This message last edited by Cannoli on 05/03/2010 at 06:57:10 PM
Reply to message
I expect the Pro-Choice crowd will have mixed feelings about this - 05/03/2010 11:14:42 AM 890 Views
So...the next Sino-Indian war is only about 10 years away... *NM* - 05/03/2010 12:49:24 PM 178 Views
A modern day Rape of the Sabine Women! - 05/03/2010 02:14:40 PM 430 Views
Where will they go, though? - 05/03/2010 02:43:28 PM 382 Views
They might end up as permanent foreign workers - 05/03/2010 04:25:00 PM 389 Views
I can't find myself disagreeing with this article - 05/03/2010 01:38:43 PM 425 Views
Why isn't it? *gears up the flamethrower* - 05/03/2010 02:31:20 PM 422 Views
both. *NM* - 05/03/2010 04:25:28 PM 177 Views
If it's a "child" then it shouldn't be aborted, period. *NM* - 05/03/2010 05:54:53 PM 161 Views
If abortion were illegal, I would want a son for sure. - 05/03/2010 01:56:56 PM 425 Views
I figure that there are two things that will come of this stupidity - 05/03/2010 02:13:25 PM 412 Views
The law of unintended consequences - 05/03/2010 04:22:15 PM 379 Views
I'll never understand why they want it “safe, legal and rare”. - 05/03/2010 05:53:50 PM 442 Views
some people that aren't quite either are lumped in with pro-choice - 05/03/2010 06:20:27 PM 388 Views
How can one logically be neither? - 05/03/2010 06:36:02 PM 378 Views
Then what is the logical moment where it goes from nothing to full person? - 05/03/2010 06:45:46 PM 383 Views
The beginning of higher brain function, which is after the midpoint of a pregnancy. - 05/03/2010 06:53:13 PM 384 Views
That is a pretty poorly defined term to use as a razor for what makes a human - 05/03/2010 08:04:00 PM 402 Views
well at a certain point it IS a lump of cells - 06/03/2010 12:39:49 AM 355 Views
I want it rare because I want more thinking beforehand - 05/03/2010 06:46:26 PM 393 Views
I don't think that's what most of them mean. - 05/03/2010 06:54:44 PM 388 Views
heh. what exactly are squiky feelings? - 05/03/2010 07:24:52 PM 445 Views
squeamish + icky = squicky *NM* - 05/03/2010 07:29:37 PM 191 Views
How can one post in the wrong place? *NM* - 05/03/2010 06:27:35 PM 211 Views
Why? It's the woman's body, she has the right to decide how to apportion her biological resources. - 05/03/2010 06:56:44 PM 524 Views
Why? - 06/03/2010 03:33:20 AM 448 Views
Unfortunately... - 06/03/2010 09:33:12 AM 434 Views
It is true that some socialist countries force the issue - 06/03/2010 12:22:21 PM 421 Views
that still doesn't (logically) explain some things - 06/03/2010 03:58:19 PM 439 Views
And for every sob story like this, there's one about a female boss with a chip on her shoulder - 06/03/2010 10:08:06 PM 498 Views
so because sexism goes both ways - 06/03/2010 10:40:54 PM 350 Views
I worked for a company that fast tracked female engineers into managment posistions - 07/03/2010 02:45:22 AM 367 Views
I know, I'm not saying there's not discrimination the other way too. - 07/03/2010 05:35:04 AM 368 Views
Well, I am very impressed - 07/03/2010 09:47:49 AM 443 Views
icwhatyoudidthar - 07/03/2010 06:25:07 PM 366 Views
I just wanted to see how he got from "less average pay" = "less desirable" - 09/03/2010 12:09:29 AM 383 Views
You got it backwards IMHO - 09/03/2010 03:07:37 AM 360 Views
Also, men retire later - 06/03/2010 05:28:13 PM 407 Views
I don't think that is a general rule - 06/03/2010 05:54:28 PM 432 Views
I'd be hard pressed to find any statistics like that - 06/03/2010 08:23:15 PM 369 Views
Statistics suck. - 06/03/2010 08:41:16 PM 363 Views
There's a lot that women themselves can do to help the cause. - 09/03/2010 12:35:34 AM 446 Views
You make sense - 09/03/2010 02:53:32 AM 353 Views
Yes, this is tragic - 06/03/2010 12:57:43 AM 396 Views

Reply to Message