Active Users:736 Time:27/08/2026 06:05:55 AM
That only means they are not entitled to its protections - in other words, they are fair game. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 19/03/2010 10:25:50 PM
We can kill them on sight. We can torture them, starve them, deny them medical care, all the rest of that stuff. The only things that have any bearing on the treatment of bin Laden, if caught, or any of his ilk, are the rules and regulations of the US Military. If he is caught on US soil, by US law enforcement officers, sure, he would be required to be read his rights or whatever the statutory requirements are for criminal arrests, but military personnel are NOT law enforcement officers (a distinction made legal by posse commitatus, and prisoners they take are presumed to be enemy combatants. Now it may be that the administration or Congress, exercising their Constitutional rights and obligations to command and make rules for the military, respectively, may impose such requirements on the military for their own reasons or based on their judgment, but there is no Constitutional requirement that anything of that sort is required.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
AG Eric Holder evades questioning - 17/03/2010 05:34:40 PM 917 Views
Why should he be read miranda rights? - 17/03/2010 05:50:29 PM 699 Views
You'd rather he walk free on a technicality? - 17/03/2010 11:28:30 PM 647 Views
Line 1 - 18/03/2010 07:14:56 AM 841 Views
Last I checked, al-Qaeda isn't a party to the Geneva Convention. - 18/03/2010 09:16:15 AM 723 Views
I suppose I must concede however, ...... - 18/03/2010 10:20:40 AM 767 Views
just to play devil's advocate... - 18/03/2010 05:18:16 PM 642 Views
That only means they are not entitled to its protections - in other words, they are fair game. - 19/03/2010 10:25:50 PM 645 Views
Not to mention Miranda is crap anyway. - 19/03/2010 10:18:46 PM 629 Views
*shrugs* - 17/03/2010 11:10:47 PM 657 Views
That doesn't seem very logical - 18/03/2010 12:03:21 AM 758 Views
It is very possible - 18/03/2010 02:12:21 AM 603 Views
Re: It is very possible - 18/03/2010 02:31:59 AM 711 Views
You do remember "I do not recall" Gonzalez right? *NM* - 18/03/2010 02:38:48 AM 290 Views
Actually not really, I was out of the country for almost his entire tenure - 18/03/2010 02:41:13 AM 648 Views
Pretty much there was some political firings of Us Attorneys - 18/03/2010 02:56:01 AM 638 Views
I remember a little of that - 18/03/2010 03:16:27 AM 628 Views
Gonzales flat out lied to congress - 18/03/2010 03:29:14 AM 614 Views
I don't think I agree with that. - 18/03/2010 02:04:48 PM 619 Views
Fair enough - 18/03/2010 02:40:42 PM 630 Views
You guys are forgetting the intel aspect. - 18/03/2010 09:40:53 PM 654 Views
do we know how much he actually knows? - 18/03/2010 09:49:50 PM 633 Views
Kinda hard to find out if he knows anything if he's dead *NM* - 18/03/2010 09:56:18 PM 272 Views
that was totally not my question - 19/03/2010 12:10:06 AM 638 Views
So in sum you are saying - 19/03/2010 12:20:27 AM 636 Views
LOL, it wasn't exactly clear - 19/03/2010 01:42:18 AM 633 Views
Yah, I was just curious how much we were assuming he knew - 19/03/2010 03:05:26 AM 593 Views
I can understand why he'd want to evade answering. - 18/03/2010 03:23:04 AM 691 Views

Reply to Message