I was using it as proof that Palatine's an before history rule isn't an actual rule in American English, which I think it worked perfectly for. I wasn't trying to rule out the possibility that some people might still say it as "An history".
Also, you are a freak for saying "An 'istory"
Also, you are a freak for saying "An 'istory"

I think I don't so much for History, although I hardly ever say history with an article in front so who knows. I definitely do for Historian. Sounds nicer.
*MySmiley*
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Do you really need to have two different pronunciations of "the"?
- 23/03/2010 02:06:02 PM
1336 Views
I've never heard of that in my life.
- 23/03/2010 02:29:37 PM
597 Views
I pronounce it both ways
- 23/03/2010 02:35:45 PM
585 Views
I have never actually heard anyone say "all intensive purposes".
- 23/03/2010 05:25:37 PM
559 Views
Really? I'd say most people say it incorrectly and most don't even know...
- 23/03/2010 09:35:49 PM
577 Views
Or irregardless. *shudders* I saw it in the dictionary but really...
- 26/03/2010 12:03:13 PM
507 Views
What Joe said, almost.
- 23/03/2010 04:51:08 PM
762 Views
Seems to me that only works if you pronounce "history" without the H. *NM*
- 23/03/2010 05:02:29 PM
370 Views
That's my point. I've never heard anyone say it without the "h." *NM*
- 24/03/2010 04:55:35 PM
307 Views
Never heard that one
- 23/03/2010 05:09:40 PM
537 Views
Heh.
- 23/03/2010 05:13:17 PM
665 Views
I speak mid-west English and have never said an history or ever heard anyone else use it.
- 23/03/2010 09:38:53 PM
620 Views
I've heard it spoken that way several times--on TV/radio by someone trying to be "serious." *NM*
- 24/03/2010 05:05:48 PM
313 Views
One is sufficient.
- 23/03/2010 02:30:53 PM
733 Views
Re: Do you really need to have two different pronunciations of "the"?
- 23/03/2010 02:46:41 PM
698 Views
As long as you don't say, "should of" 'cos then I must beat you.
- 23/03/2010 05:49:09 PM
609 Views
- 23/03/2010 05:49:09 PM
609 Views
Re: As long as you don't say, "should of" 'cos then I must beat you.
- 23/03/2010 06:09:27 PM
496 Views
- 23/03/2010 06:09:27 PM
496 Views
I think that there are people who pronounce The with that convention
- 23/03/2010 02:47:59 PM
584 Views
Unfortunately you chose two very bad examples.
- 23/03/2010 02:48:42 PM
791 Views
British English is weird oO
- 23/03/2010 02:59:49 PM
599 Views
"y" is a consonant? or the "u" sound
- 23/03/2010 09:02:57 PM
702 Views
Whatever the nativespeakers say
- 23/03/2010 05:01:16 PM
556 Views
Do you mean "consistent"? If not, I can't work out what you mean by "consequent".
- 23/03/2010 05:05:38 PM
513 Views
I can testify that that one is a terribly annoying false friend in Dutch. And apparently in Swedish.
- 23/03/2010 05:10:03 PM
662 Views
What do people confuse "eventual" with? "Eventful"?
- 23/03/2010 05:12:02 PM
519 Views
You never realize even the most obvious of these things in your own language.
- 23/03/2010 05:16:35 PM
585 Views
"Gift" has amused me ever since I started learning German.
- 23/03/2010 05:39:48 PM
475 Views
Oh, it must be an incredibly important word to know when visiting Europe.
- 23/03/2010 08:12:19 PM
580 Views
Even so.
- 23/03/2010 08:29:52 PM
568 Views
I wasnt invited!
- 23/03/2010 09:04:16 PM
563 Views
You were so.
- 23/03/2010 09:05:58 PM
492 Views
No, I better finish my stupid essay!
- 23/03/2010 09:08:06 PM
563 Views
I can't imagine a world where that could possibly be as rewarding or invigorating as my company.
- 23/03/2010 09:11:49 PM
507 Views
- 23/03/2010 09:11:49 PM
507 Views
Nah, it's not about EFL, it's about Dutch-English false friends.
- 23/03/2010 05:17:28 PM
693 Views
Wait! The English eventual doesnt mean that?
- 23/03/2010 05:21:19 PM
542 Views
I think the English "eventual" applies to something that is more certain (or assumed) in the future
- 23/03/2010 05:25:39 PM
484 Views
How would you translate eventueel into English? "Potential"? "The possibility of"?
- 23/03/2010 05:23:58 PM
637 Views
I think I'd ditch the adjective and switch the sentence around to a different construction.
- 23/03/2010 05:33:19 PM
678 Views
Do you only use it for future? Or all possible things that may or may not be?
- 23/03/2010 10:27:16 PM
562 Views
Dutch is way closer to Norwegian than to Danish.
- 23/03/2010 11:07:51 PM
511 Views
- 23/03/2010 11:07:51 PM
511 Views
Re: Dutch is way closer to Norwegian than to Danish.
- 23/03/2010 11:09:54 PM
623 Views
- 23/03/2010 11:09:54 PM
623 Views
*nods* Similar, but not the same, then.
- 23/03/2010 11:12:37 PM
544 Views
Re: *nods* Similar, but not the same, then.
- 23/03/2010 11:22:52 PM
484 Views
Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
- 23/03/2010 11:28:01 PM
559 Views
tim might be able to answer that better than me, as he probably understands what you are referringto
- 23/03/2010 11:33:07 PM
495 Views
Re: Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
- 23/03/2010 11:39:37 PM
585 Views
Re: Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
- 23/03/2010 11:42:29 PM
925 Views
Nah, I know, that's why I said "eventuell" was a bad example - it makes no sense as a predicate.
- 23/03/2010 11:51:06 PM
635 Views
I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes.
- 24/03/2010 09:27:28 AM
467 Views
Re: I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes.
- 25/03/2010 12:15:14 PM
587 Views
konsekvent
- 23/03/2010 06:22:26 PM
543 Views
We need to make a Dutch-Norwegian-Swedish mixture language to replace English, clearly.
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 06:27:23 PM
368 Views
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 06:27:23 PM
368 Views
Re: We need to make a Dutch-Norwegian-Swedish mixture language to replace English, clearly.
- 23/03/2010 06:28:47 PM
643 Views
- 23/03/2010 06:28:47 PM
643 Views
Why dilute a perfectly good language with norwegian, dutch and austrian? *NM*
- 23/03/2010 08:12:40 PM
327 Views
Cool! I'm in!
- 23/03/2010 08:16:32 PM
548 Views
I've no doubt its grammar is awesome... making more sense, that sounds rather less likely.
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 08:23:10 PM
321 Views
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 08:23:10 PM
321 Views
I don't, but I'm American, and apparently that makes the difference.
- 23/03/2010 05:55:10 PM
603 Views
Try it with a bunch of words starting with vowels, then.
- 23/03/2010 05:59:03 PM
505 Views
I don't know if we need to, but it would sound silly if we didn't
- 23/03/2010 06:05:53 PM
498 Views
Re: I don't know if we need to, but it would sound silly if we didn't
- 23/03/2010 06:26:30 PM
678 Views
Thuh is what most people I know use although I find that more educated people use thee at times.
- 23/03/2010 09:58:57 PM
524 Views

*NM*
*NM*