Active Users:635 Time:27/03/2026 11:15:14 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
tim might be able to answer that better than me, as he probably understands what you are referringto Camilla Send a noteboard - 23/03/2010 11:33:07 PM

No, I don't think so. I am not entirely sure what you mean by that, though.

We sometimes add a t: eventuelt. As in "vi kan eventuelt gjøre noe annet" "as an alternative, we could do something else". The e is a pure plural marker, though. As far as I can think at the moment.


It was probably too much to hope for that the similarities went that far. ;) Dutch has a simplified version of the German system in which, while predicative adjectives are unchangeable ("ze zijn groot", "sie sind groß" = they are tall), attributive adjectives can change depending on gender and number, though the change is limited to an extra E or not (not remotely as complicated as German). In plurals, the extra E is indeed always there, but in many singular forms too.


Norwegian doesn't do that, except in a very few cases and then with an a for feminine. But that is rare and mostly in dialects. I am still not clear on what a predicative adjective is. I assume that means we don't have the distinction. If it is related to the case system, we've probably discarded it long since. Norwegian is terribly simple. The adjectives follow the nouns. "en eventuell jente" (an "eventuell" girl) "en eventuell gutt" (an "eventuell" boy) "to eventuelle jenter" (two "eventuell" boys) etc. So nothing to do with gender. The t is to do with the neuter, but is also the one that stands alone, for some reason I cannot immediately fathom. hmm.


the more I think about it, the weirder it seems. because neuter IS related to gender. And you would say "et eventuelt hus"... I have managed to confuse myself entirely. I think I'll have to return to this tomorrow with a clear head.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
This message last edited by Camilla on 23/03/2010 at 11:35:45 PM
Reply to message
Do you really need to have two different pronunciations of "the"? Lordling - 23/03/2010 02:06:02 PM 1359 Views
Need? No. Rebekah - 23/03/2010 02:17:09 PM 527 Views
I've never heard of that in my life. LiterateDog - 23/03/2010 02:29:37 PM 617 Views
I pronounce it both ways Sareitha Sedai - 23/03/2010 02:35:45 PM 608 Views
It's like "a". LiterateDog - 23/03/2010 02:45:14 PM 700 Views
Oh. I do that too. Sareitha Sedai - 23/03/2010 02:59:20 PM 630 Views
"all intenstive purposes"...*shudder* LadyLorraine - 23/03/2010 02:45:35 PM 584 Views
Yeah, that makes me shudder, too. People are retarded. *NM* LiterateDog - 23/03/2010 02:50:41 PM 312 Views
I have never actually heard anyone say "all intensive purposes". MightyYT - 23/03/2010 05:25:37 PM 584 Views
Or you could be surrounded by smarter people than I am. *NM* Sareitha Sedai - 23/03/2010 05:26:44 PM 224 Views
Really? I'd say most people say it incorrectly and most don't even know... everynametaken - 23/03/2010 09:35:49 PM 601 Views
I do too damookster - 24/03/2010 04:07:56 AM 495 Views
Or irregardless. *shudders* I saw it in the dictionary but really... globug0822 - 26/03/2010 12:03:13 PM 531 Views
You should a a few words Floffe - 26/03/2010 12:42:36 PM 552 Views
What Joe said, almost. Palatine - 23/03/2010 04:51:08 PM 787 Views
Seems to me that only works if you pronounce "history" without the H. *NM* Legolas - 23/03/2010 05:02:29 PM 379 Views
That's my point. I've never heard anyone say it without the "h." *NM* Palatine - 24/03/2010 04:55:35 PM 317 Views
An history Rebekah - 23/03/2010 05:07:08 PM 757 Views
(h)erb. *NM* everynametaken - 23/03/2010 09:37:58 PM 307 Views
I will not use "an." Palatine - 24/03/2010 04:59:00 PM 534 Views
Never heard that one snoopcester - 23/03/2010 05:09:40 PM 567 Views
Heh. Rebekah - 23/03/2010 05:13:17 PM 691 Views
I wasn't using it as that snoopcester - 23/03/2010 05:19:43 PM 526 Views
OK. Rebekah - 23/03/2010 05:25:22 PM 595 Views
It's enough of a rule. Palatine - 24/03/2010 05:02:46 PM 563 Views
Re: Never heard that one ßelals Girl - 23/03/2010 06:14:21 PM 697 Views
I speak mid-west English and have never said an history or ever heard anyone else use it. everynametaken - 23/03/2010 09:38:53 PM 650 Views
I've heard it spoken that way several times--on TV/radio by someone trying to be "serious." *NM* Palatine - 24/03/2010 05:05:48 PM 321 Views
It seems I use them both. Beqi - 23/03/2010 06:05:30 PM 540 Views
I also don't post in the correct place, it seems. Beqi - 23/03/2010 06:36:59 PM 558 Views
One is sufficient. The Shrike - 23/03/2010 02:30:53 PM 756 Views
Is it possible you do it and don't realize it? Avendesora - 23/03/2010 05:11:28 PM 493 Views
I think I do it in many cases, yeah... Legolas - 23/03/2010 05:19:13 PM 619 Views
That's what we were taught in school as well ironclad - 23/03/2010 02:35:29 PM 592 Views
That's what I thought of, too. Joel - 23/03/2010 05:42:14 PM 604 Views
Re: Do you really need to have two different pronunciations of "the"? lyringlas - 23/03/2010 02:46:41 PM 723 Views
As long as you don't say, "should of" 'cos then I must beat you. Joel - 23/03/2010 05:49:09 PM 639 Views
Re: As long as you don't say, "should of" 'cos then I must beat you. lyringlas - 23/03/2010 06:09:27 PM 518 Views
"Should've" versus "should of" Bored - 23/03/2010 06:46:37 PM 617 Views
Sounds like we're on thee same page. Joel - 23/03/2010 06:58:21 PM 669 Views
I tend to use both Isaac - 23/03/2010 10:06:01 PM 590 Views
I think that there are people who pronounce The with that convention LadyLorraine - 23/03/2010 02:47:59 PM 610 Views
Unfortunately you chose two very bad examples. Tim - 23/03/2010 02:48:42 PM 816 Views
British English is weird oO LadyLorraine - 23/03/2010 02:59:49 PM 624 Views
I don't. Tim - 23/03/2010 03:04:22 PM 619 Views
Right Sareitha Sedai - 23/03/2010 03:10:08 PM 595 Views
duly noted LadyLorraine - 23/03/2010 03:10:16 PM 574 Views
I do! Liam - 23/03/2010 10:57:48 PM 599 Views
Shut up, Frenchie! LiterateDog - 23/03/2010 11:03:21 PM 556 Views
Hehe ironclad - 23/03/2010 03:06:31 PM 548 Views
"Park Life!" *NM* Tim - 23/03/2010 03:09:24 PM 233 Views
*NM* ironclad - 23/03/2010 03:10:35 PM 259 Views
Heh, thanks for bringing this up. *NM* Avendesora - 23/03/2010 04:37:07 PM 302 Views
That was my immediate reaction to this post! *NM* Tom - 23/03/2010 05:21:16 PM 352 Views
"y" is a consonant? or the "u" sound Aeryn - 23/03/2010 09:02:57 PM 726 Views
Hopefully this will explain. Tim - 23/03/2010 11:29:58 PM 656 Views
Re: Hopefully this will explain. Aeryn - 25/03/2010 08:40:21 PM 808 Views
I've only just discovered I do it. Liam - 23/03/2010 11:02:18 PM 535 Views
AH! globug0822 - 26/03/2010 11:48:35 AM 509 Views
Whatever the nativespeakers say Sophy - 23/03/2010 05:01:16 PM 580 Views
Do you mean "consistent"? If not, I can't work out what you mean by "consequent". Tim - 23/03/2010 05:05:38 PM 536 Views
I can testify that that one is a terribly annoying false friend in Dutch. And apparently in Swedish. Legolas - 23/03/2010 05:10:03 PM 687 Views
What do people confuse "eventual" with? "Eventful"? Tim - 23/03/2010 05:12:02 PM 544 Views
You never realize even the most obvious of these things in your own language. Sophy - 23/03/2010 05:16:35 PM 609 Views
"Gift" has amused me ever since I started learning German. Joel - 23/03/2010 05:39:48 PM 497 Views
*NM* ironclad - 23/03/2010 07:45:48 PM 277 Views
Oh, it must be an incredibly important word to know when visiting Europe. Sophy - 23/03/2010 08:12:19 PM 606 Views
Even so. Joel - 23/03/2010 08:29:52 PM 591 Views
I wasnt invited! Sophy - 23/03/2010 09:04:16 PM 585 Views
You were so. Joel - 23/03/2010 09:05:58 PM 519 Views
No, I better finish my stupid essay! Sophy - 23/03/2010 09:08:06 PM 585 Views
I can't imagine a world where that could possibly be as rewarding or invigorating as my company. Joel - 23/03/2010 09:11:49 PM 535 Views
Nah, it's not about EFL, it's about Dutch-English false friends. Legolas - 23/03/2010 05:17:28 PM 718 Views
Wait! The English eventual doesnt mean that? Sophy - 23/03/2010 05:21:19 PM 567 Views
English "eventual" means something like "in the end". Legolas - 23/03/2010 05:23:33 PM 564 Views
Whoops! Sophy - 23/03/2010 05:26:05 PM 598 Views
I think the English "eventual" applies to something that is more certain (or assumed) in the future Sareitha Sedai - 23/03/2010 05:25:39 PM 509 Views
LOL what is it with you today?? *NM* ironclad - 23/03/2010 07:57:33 PM 302 Views
You mean that I'm usually brighter? Sophy - 23/03/2010 08:13:04 PM 581 Views
How would you translate eventueel into English? "Potential"? "The possibility of"? Tim - 23/03/2010 05:23:58 PM 661 Views
I think I'd ditch the adjective and switch the sentence around to a different construction. Legolas - 23/03/2010 05:33:19 PM 709 Views
Do you only use it for future? Or all possible things that may or may not be? Camilla - 23/03/2010 10:27:16 PM 589 Views
Dutch is way closer to Norwegian than to Danish. Legolas - 23/03/2010 11:07:51 PM 538 Views
Re: Dutch is way closer to Norwegian than to Danish. Camilla - 23/03/2010 11:09:54 PM 651 Views
*nods* Similar, but not the same, then. Legolas - 23/03/2010 11:12:37 PM 571 Views
Re: *nods* Similar, but not the same, then. Camilla - 23/03/2010 11:22:52 PM 514 Views
Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then? Legolas - 23/03/2010 11:28:01 PM 585 Views
tim might be able to answer that better than me, as he probably understands what you are referringto Camilla - 23/03/2010 11:33:07 PM 528 Views
Re: Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then? Legolas - 23/03/2010 11:39:37 PM 613 Views
Re: Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then? Camilla - 23/03/2010 11:42:29 PM 953 Views
Nah, I know, that's why I said "eventuell" was a bad example - it makes no sense as a predicate. Legolas - 23/03/2010 11:51:06 PM 659 Views
I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes. Tim - 24/03/2010 09:27:28 AM 496 Views
Re: I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes. Camilla - 25/03/2010 12:15:14 PM 606 Views
Ah, that's the right word, yes. Sophy - 23/03/2010 05:10:19 PM 560 Views
konsekvent Camilla - 23/03/2010 06:22:26 PM 569 Views
We need to make a Dutch-Norwegian-Swedish mixture language to replace English, clearly. *NM* Legolas - 23/03/2010 06:27:23 PM 376 Views
Re: We need to make a Dutch-Norwegian-Swedish mixture language to replace English, clearly. Camilla - 23/03/2010 06:28:47 PM 671 Views
This is an excellent point. Legolas - 23/03/2010 08:23:42 PM 466 Views
*clears throat* *NM* ironclad - 23/03/2010 07:58:21 PM 267 Views
Okay, we'll let Austrian join too. Legolas - 23/03/2010 08:00:26 PM 487 Views
Why dilute a perfectly good language with norwegian, dutch and austrian? *NM* jh - 23/03/2010 08:12:40 PM 335 Views
Cool! I'm in! Sophy - 23/03/2010 08:16:32 PM 569 Views
I've no doubt its grammar is awesome... making more sense, that sounds rather less likely. *NM* Legolas - 23/03/2010 08:23:10 PM 331 Views
Don't listen to her ironclad - 23/03/2010 08:24:06 PM 536 Views
Hmpf! Böse Kartoffel! Sophy - 23/03/2010 09:05:37 PM 630 Views
Like Esperanto but with germanic roots? Me likey! *NM* Floffe - 24/03/2010 04:43:59 PM 317 Views
Nopes. nossy - 23/03/2010 05:03:18 PM 557 Views
In my dialect, it's more or less like that Larry - 23/03/2010 05:35:31 PM 490 Views
I don't, but I'm American, and apparently that makes the difference. Joel - 23/03/2010 05:55:10 PM 629 Views
Try it with a bunch of words starting with vowels, then. Legolas - 23/03/2010 05:59:03 PM 529 Views
"thuh" for the first two, seems like "thee" for the rest. Joel - 23/03/2010 06:08:14 PM 634 Views
The (thuh) for all of them. everynametaken - 23/03/2010 09:53:16 PM 556 Views
Thee for all of them *NM* ironclad - 23/03/2010 09:54:58 PM 326 Views
Me too. *NM* Legolas - 23/03/2010 09:59:16 PM 293 Views
Thee for all! o/ Avendesora - 24/03/2010 08:37:23 PM 591 Views
I don't know if we need to, but it would sound silly if we didn't ßelals Girl - 23/03/2010 06:05:53 PM 520 Views
Re: I don't know if we need to, but it would sound silly if we didn't Lordling - 23/03/2010 06:26:30 PM 714 Views
Just go with instinct Rebekah - 23/03/2010 06:29:52 PM 561 Views
Quit while you're behind... Tom - 23/03/2010 08:58:26 PM 582 Views
Unless you like to use archaic English, that is Larry - 23/03/2010 09:20:26 PM 561 Views
I somehow doubt that Lordling - 25/03/2010 08:09:44 PM 705 Views
I like it Camilla - 23/03/2010 06:23:06 PM 574 Views
You sound like him Lordling - 23/03/2010 06:32:09 PM 601 Views
Re: You sound like him Camilla - 23/03/2010 06:33:03 PM 635 Views
Oh!!! That's just the kind of teacher I'm going to be! *NM* Sophy - 23/03/2010 09:06:26 PM 456 Views
Haha good stuff *NM* ironclad - 23/03/2010 09:24:37 PM 298 Views
Never heard of that before. *NM* Wibble - 23/03/2010 08:18:48 PM 218 Views
I do it AgentOrange - 23/03/2010 09:32:04 PM 509 Views
Same here. *NM* Legolas - 23/03/2010 09:33:51 PM 317 Views
Thuh is what most people I know use although I find that more educated people use thee at times. everynametaken - 23/03/2010 09:58:57 PM 549 Views
I have never heard that before in my life. globug0822 - 26/03/2010 11:46:44 AM 725 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes