I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes.
Tim Send a noteboard - 24/03/2010 09:27:28 AM
For now, I shall merely say that the thing Camilla said was nothing to do with gender is everything to do with gender. Gender and sex are not the same thing. If you don't believe me, ask a speaker of Swahili, which has eight genders of which one includes people of both sexes.
Norwegian adjectival endings are as follows:
"Strong" form:
Used for adjectives in indefinite noun phrases ("a big thing") and predicates ("the thing is big")
Masc/fem sg: -0 <- that's a zero, not an O. It means "no ending".
Neut sg: -t (this also makes adverbs)
M/F/N pl: -e
"Weak" form:
Used for adjectives in definite noun phrases ("the big thing")
All forms: -e
Norwegian adjectival endings are as follows:
"Strong" form:
Used for adjectives in indefinite noun phrases ("a big thing") and predicates ("the thing is big")
Masc/fem sg: -0 <- that's a zero, not an O. It means "no ending".
Neut sg: -t (this also makes adverbs)
M/F/N pl: -e
"Weak" form:
Used for adjectives in definite noun phrases ("the big thing")
All forms: -e
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt.
—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.
—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.
—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
This message last edited by Tim on 24/03/2010 at 09:29:05 AM
Do you really need to have two different pronunciations of "the"?
23/03/2010 02:06:02 PM
- 1288 Views
I've never heard of that in my life.
23/03/2010 02:29:37 PM
- 549 Views
I pronounce it both ways
23/03/2010 02:35:45 PM
- 543 Views
I have never actually heard anyone say "all intensive purposes".
23/03/2010 05:25:37 PM
- 520 Views
Really? I'd say most people say it incorrectly and most don't even know...
23/03/2010 09:35:49 PM
- 508 Views
Or irregardless. *shudders* I saw it in the dictionary but really...
26/03/2010 12:03:13 PM
- 467 Views
What Joe said, almost.
23/03/2010 04:51:08 PM
- 720 Views
Seems to me that only works if you pronounce "history" without the H. *NM*
23/03/2010 05:02:29 PM
- 354 Views
That's my point. I've never heard anyone say it without the "h." *NM*
24/03/2010 04:55:35 PM
- 292 Views
Never heard that one
23/03/2010 05:09:40 PM
- 473 Views
Heh.
23/03/2010 05:13:17 PM
- 594 Views
I speak mid-west English and have never said an history or ever heard anyone else use it.
23/03/2010 09:38:53 PM
- 568 Views
I've heard it spoken that way several times--on TV/radio by someone trying to be "serious." *NM*
24/03/2010 05:05:48 PM
- 297 Views
One is sufficient.
23/03/2010 02:30:53 PM
- 692 Views
Re: Do you really need to have two different pronunciations of "the"?
23/03/2010 02:46:41 PM
- 660 Views
As long as you don't say, "should of" 'cos then I must beat you.
23/03/2010 05:49:09 PM
- 572 Views

Re: As long as you don't say, "should of" 'cos then I must beat you.
23/03/2010 06:09:27 PM
- 455 Views

I think that there are people who pronounce The with that convention
23/03/2010 02:47:59 PM
- 544 Views
Unfortunately you chose two very bad examples.
23/03/2010 02:48:42 PM
- 745 Views
British English is weird oO
23/03/2010 02:59:49 PM
- 555 Views
"y" is a consonant? or the "u" sound
23/03/2010 09:02:57 PM
- 664 Views
Whatever the nativespeakers say
23/03/2010 05:01:16 PM
- 512 Views
Do you mean "consistent"? If not, I can't work out what you mean by "consequent".
23/03/2010 05:05:38 PM
- 475 Views
I can testify that that one is a terribly annoying false friend in Dutch. And apparently in Swedish.
23/03/2010 05:10:03 PM
- 614 Views
What do people confuse "eventual" with? "Eventful"?
23/03/2010 05:12:02 PM
- 483 Views
You never realize even the most obvious of these things in your own language.
23/03/2010 05:16:35 PM
- 542 Views
"Gift" has amused me ever since I started learning German.
23/03/2010 05:39:48 PM
- 423 Views
Oh, it must be an incredibly important word to know when visiting Europe.
23/03/2010 08:12:19 PM
- 532 Views
Even so.
23/03/2010 08:29:52 PM
- 531 Views
I wasnt invited!
23/03/2010 09:04:16 PM
- 524 Views
You were so.
23/03/2010 09:05:58 PM
- 456 Views
No, I better finish my stupid essay!
23/03/2010 09:08:06 PM
- 519 Views
I can't imagine a world where that could possibly be as rewarding or invigorating as my company.
23/03/2010 09:11:49 PM
- 465 Views

Nah, it's not about EFL, it's about Dutch-English false friends.
23/03/2010 05:17:28 PM
- 652 Views
Wait! The English eventual doesnt mean that?
23/03/2010 05:21:19 PM
- 504 Views
I think the English "eventual" applies to something that is more certain (or assumed) in the future
23/03/2010 05:25:39 PM
- 440 Views
How would you translate eventueel into English? "Potential"? "The possibility of"?
23/03/2010 05:23:58 PM
- 592 Views
I think I'd ditch the adjective and switch the sentence around to a different construction.
23/03/2010 05:33:19 PM
- 619 Views
Do you only use it for future? Or all possible things that may or may not be?
23/03/2010 10:27:16 PM
- 517 Views
Dutch is way closer to Norwegian than to Danish.
23/03/2010 11:07:51 PM
- 471 Views

Re: Dutch is way closer to Norwegian than to Danish.
23/03/2010 11:09:54 PM
- 583 Views

*nods* Similar, but not the same, then.
23/03/2010 11:12:37 PM
- 491 Views
Re: *nods* Similar, but not the same, then.
23/03/2010 11:22:52 PM
- 442 Views
Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
23/03/2010 11:28:01 PM
- 524 Views
tim might be able to answer that better than me, as he probably understands what you are referringto
23/03/2010 11:33:07 PM
- 450 Views
Re: Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
23/03/2010 11:39:37 PM
- 545 Views
Re: Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
23/03/2010 11:42:29 PM
- 860 Views
Nah, I know, that's why I said "eventuell" was a bad example - it makes no sense as a predicate.
23/03/2010 11:51:06 PM
- 593 Views
I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes.
24/03/2010 09:27:28 AM
- 428 Views
Re: I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes.
25/03/2010 12:15:14 PM
- 554 Views
konsekvent
23/03/2010 06:22:26 PM
- 497 Views
We need to make a Dutch-Norwegian-Swedish mixture language to replace English, clearly.
*NM*
23/03/2010 06:27:23 PM
- 350 Views

Re: We need to make a Dutch-Norwegian-Swedish mixture language to replace English, clearly.
23/03/2010 06:28:47 PM
- 598 Views

Why dilute a perfectly good language with norwegian, dutch and austrian? *NM*
23/03/2010 08:12:40 PM
- 301 Views
Cool! I'm in!
23/03/2010 08:16:32 PM
- 506 Views
I've no doubt its grammar is awesome... making more sense, that sounds rather less likely.
*NM*
23/03/2010 08:23:10 PM
- 306 Views

I don't, but I'm American, and apparently that makes the difference.
23/03/2010 05:55:10 PM
- 547 Views
Try it with a bunch of words starting with vowels, then.
23/03/2010 05:59:03 PM
- 463 Views
I don't know if we need to, but it would sound silly if we didn't
23/03/2010 06:05:53 PM
- 454 Views
Re: I don't know if we need to, but it would sound silly if we didn't
23/03/2010 06:26:30 PM
- 626 Views
Thuh is what most people I know use although I find that more educated people use thee at times.
23/03/2010 09:58:57 PM
- 484 Views