I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes.
Tim Send a noteboard - 24/03/2010 09:27:28 AM
For now, I shall merely say that the thing Camilla said was nothing to do with gender is everything to do with gender. Gender and sex are not the same thing. If you don't believe me, ask a speaker of Swahili, which has eight genders of which one includes people of both sexes.
Norwegian adjectival endings are as follows:
"Strong" form:
Used for adjectives in indefinite noun phrases ("a big thing") and predicates ("the thing is big")
Masc/fem sg: -0 <- that's a zero, not an O. It means "no ending".
Neut sg: -t (this also makes adverbs)
M/F/N pl: -e
"Weak" form:
Used for adjectives in definite noun phrases ("the big thing")
All forms: -e
Norwegian adjectival endings are as follows:
"Strong" form:
Used for adjectives in indefinite noun phrases ("a big thing") and predicates ("the thing is big")
Masc/fem sg: -0 <- that's a zero, not an O. It means "no ending".
Neut sg: -t (this also makes adverbs)
M/F/N pl: -e
"Weak" form:
Used for adjectives in definite noun phrases ("the big thing")
All forms: -e
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt.
—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.
—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.
—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
This message last edited by Tim on 24/03/2010 at 09:29:05 AM
Do you really need to have two different pronunciations of "the"?
- 23/03/2010 02:06:02 PM
1425 Views
I've never heard of that in my life.
- 23/03/2010 02:29:37 PM
691 Views
I pronounce it both ways
- 23/03/2010 02:35:45 PM
688 Views
I have never actually heard anyone say "all intensive purposes".
- 23/03/2010 05:25:37 PM
656 Views
Really? I'd say most people say it incorrectly and most don't even know...
- 23/03/2010 09:35:49 PM
668 Views
Or irregardless. *shudders* I saw it in the dictionary but really...
- 26/03/2010 12:03:13 PM
613 Views
What Joe said, almost.
- 23/03/2010 04:51:08 PM
859 Views
Seems to me that only works if you pronounce "history" without the H. *NM*
- 23/03/2010 05:02:29 PM
416 Views
That's my point. I've never heard anyone say it without the "h." *NM*
- 24/03/2010 04:55:35 PM
360 Views
Never heard that one
- 23/03/2010 05:09:40 PM
636 Views
Heh.
- 23/03/2010 05:13:17 PM
770 Views
I speak mid-west English and have never said an history or ever heard anyone else use it.
- 23/03/2010 09:38:53 PM
720 Views
I've heard it spoken that way several times--on TV/radio by someone trying to be "serious." *NM*
- 24/03/2010 05:05:48 PM
358 Views
One is sufficient.
- 23/03/2010 02:30:53 PM
826 Views
Re: Do you really need to have two different pronunciations of "the"?
- 23/03/2010 02:46:41 PM
784 Views
As long as you don't say, "should of" 'cos then I must beat you.
- 23/03/2010 05:49:09 PM
702 Views
- 23/03/2010 05:49:09 PM
702 Views
Re: As long as you don't say, "should of" 'cos then I must beat you.
- 23/03/2010 06:09:27 PM
572 Views
- 23/03/2010 06:09:27 PM
572 Views
I think that there are people who pronounce The with that convention
- 23/03/2010 02:47:59 PM
703 Views
Unfortunately you chose two very bad examples.
- 23/03/2010 02:48:42 PM
900 Views
British English is weird oO
- 23/03/2010 02:59:49 PM
692 Views
"y" is a consonant? or the "u" sound
- 23/03/2010 09:02:57 PM
801 Views
Whatever the nativespeakers say
- 23/03/2010 05:01:16 PM
658 Views
Do you mean "consistent"? If not, I can't work out what you mean by "consequent".
- 23/03/2010 05:05:38 PM
599 Views
I can testify that that one is a terribly annoying false friend in Dutch. And apparently in Swedish.
- 23/03/2010 05:10:03 PM
757 Views
What do people confuse "eventual" with? "Eventful"?
- 23/03/2010 05:12:02 PM
621 Views
You never realize even the most obvious of these things in your own language.
- 23/03/2010 05:16:35 PM
675 Views
"Gift" has amused me ever since I started learning German.
- 23/03/2010 05:39:48 PM
565 Views
Oh, it must be an incredibly important word to know when visiting Europe.
- 23/03/2010 08:12:19 PM
673 Views
Even so.
- 23/03/2010 08:29:52 PM
680 Views
I wasnt invited!
- 23/03/2010 09:04:16 PM
655 Views
You were so.
- 23/03/2010 09:05:58 PM
613 Views
No, I better finish my stupid essay!
- 23/03/2010 09:08:06 PM
680 Views
I can't imagine a world where that could possibly be as rewarding or invigorating as my company.
- 23/03/2010 09:11:49 PM
616 Views
- 23/03/2010 09:11:49 PM
616 Views
Nah, it's not about EFL, it's about Dutch-English false friends.
- 23/03/2010 05:17:28 PM
785 Views
Wait! The English eventual doesnt mean that?
- 23/03/2010 05:21:19 PM
632 Views
I think the English "eventual" applies to something that is more certain (or assumed) in the future
- 23/03/2010 05:25:39 PM
588 Views
How would you translate eventueel into English? "Potential"? "The possibility of"?
- 23/03/2010 05:23:58 PM
729 Views
I think I'd ditch the adjective and switch the sentence around to a different construction.
- 23/03/2010 05:33:19 PM
798 Views
Do you only use it for future? Or all possible things that may or may not be?
- 23/03/2010 10:27:16 PM
661 Views
Dutch is way closer to Norwegian than to Danish.
- 23/03/2010 11:07:51 PM
608 Views
- 23/03/2010 11:07:51 PM
608 Views
Re: Dutch is way closer to Norwegian than to Danish.
- 23/03/2010 11:09:54 PM
712 Views
- 23/03/2010 11:09:54 PM
712 Views
*nods* Similar, but not the same, then.
- 23/03/2010 11:12:37 PM
646 Views
Re: *nods* Similar, but not the same, then.
- 23/03/2010 11:22:52 PM
581 Views
Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
- 23/03/2010 11:28:01 PM
656 Views
tim might be able to answer that better than me, as he probably understands what you are referringto
- 23/03/2010 11:33:07 PM
593 Views
Re: Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
- 23/03/2010 11:39:37 PM
678 Views
Re: Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
- 23/03/2010 11:42:29 PM
1025 Views
Nah, I know, that's why I said "eventuell" was a bad example - it makes no sense as a predicate.
- 23/03/2010 11:51:06 PM
734 Views
I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes.
- 24/03/2010 09:27:28 AM
568 Views
Re: I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes.
- 25/03/2010 12:15:14 PM
678 Views
konsekvent
- 23/03/2010 06:22:26 PM
631 Views
We need to make a Dutch-Norwegian-Swedish mixture language to replace English, clearly.
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 06:27:23 PM
415 Views
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 06:27:23 PM
415 Views
Re: We need to make a Dutch-Norwegian-Swedish mixture language to replace English, clearly.
- 23/03/2010 06:28:47 PM
746 Views
- 23/03/2010 06:28:47 PM
746 Views
Why dilute a perfectly good language with norwegian, dutch and austrian? *NM*
- 23/03/2010 08:12:40 PM
374 Views
Cool! I'm in!
- 23/03/2010 08:16:32 PM
640 Views
I've no doubt its grammar is awesome... making more sense, that sounds rather less likely.
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 08:23:10 PM
366 Views
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 08:23:10 PM
366 Views
I don't, but I'm American, and apparently that makes the difference.
- 23/03/2010 05:55:10 PM
693 Views
Try it with a bunch of words starting with vowels, then.
- 23/03/2010 05:59:03 PM
596 Views
I don't know if we need to, but it would sound silly if we didn't
- 23/03/2010 06:05:53 PM
614 Views
Re: I don't know if we need to, but it would sound silly if we didn't
- 23/03/2010 06:26:30 PM
800 Views
Thuh is what most people I know use although I find that more educated people use thee at times.
- 23/03/2010 09:58:57 PM
635 Views

*NM*
*NM*