Active Users:771 Time:20/05/2026 10:11:49 AM
Lancashire hates sex. Danae al'Thor Send a noteboard - 24/03/2010 04:21:48 PM
Seriously.

And possibly the environment too, but Rebekah tells me 6000 trees is not a lot. So maybe they just like to cut down things? And used sex as an excuse?

Poor exhibitionists. Where will they go now?

http://coolingpearls.wordpress.com/
http://uncategoricallyroh.wordpress.com/
http://whaq.blogspot.com/
~Roh
6000 trees!
Reply to message
Lancashire hates sex. - 24/03/2010 04:21:48 PM 753 Views
that's dumb. people are just going to go elsewhere... *NM* - 24/03/2010 04:42:18 PM 195 Views
Why exactly is dogging an issue for these people? - 24/03/2010 05:17:44 PM 532 Views
Who cares if people are doing it in the woods? Better than in the street! *NM* - 24/03/2010 05:19:33 PM 293 Views
That depends on who you ask.... *NM* - 24/03/2010 08:45:41 PM 202 Views
Why? No one will be watching them. - 25/03/2010 06:35:04 AM 459 Views
"The conifer trees are very valuable in attracting rainfall to the area"? - 24/03/2010 09:41:09 PM 485 Views
Re: Not completely certain, but apparently there IS a correlation between - 24/03/2010 10:45:34 PM 485 Views
That isn't surprising, since trees need rain to grow. - 24/03/2010 10:54:37 PM 496 Views
Hahaha! For ei gås! - 25/03/2010 04:29:04 PM 476 Views
Well it's not entirely idiotic, just mostly idiotic - 25/03/2010 11:29:05 AM 473 Views
Do we REALLY want people breeding next to A666? - 25/03/2010 06:33:55 AM 489 Views
Re: Everything in its time, and a time for everything. *NM* - 25/03/2010 10:39:02 AM 214 Views

Reply to Message