Active Users:821 Time:07/08/2025 07:55:43 AM
Correct me if I'm wrong but... Kalazor Send a noteboard - 25/03/2010 04:54:51 PM
They can tell all that from an old pinky bone they dug up? Maybe it was just a person whose mother was also her sister or some such thing. Forgive me if I remain sceptical until they find something more than a pinky bone.

Well, they can extract DNA from fossilised mammoths, so why not a human(oid) pinky bone? Note that this does not give any information about looks, constitution or way-of-life, as stated in the article.


We've just recently "cracked" the DNA code right? I mean I'm no scientist, but if we're at the early stages of understanding DNA coding and sequences there is a lot that is subject to error. I'm certainly not saying it's not possible that she's a distant ancestor of humans I'm just not buying it, at the moment. I need something a bit more concrete than a pinky bone.

And doesn't generations of inbreeding cause all kinds of weird issues? Again, not saying this is the case, just asking.
RAFO's resident Husker Fanatic
GO BIG RED!!!
"Better Dead Than Sooner Red"
This message last edited by Kalazor on 25/03/2010 at 04:58:08 PM
Reply to message
Possible new human ancestor found in Siberia - 25/03/2010 03:26:22 AM 593 Views
Yes, I found that very exciting (link to new scientist article) - 25/03/2010 08:02:55 AM 389 Views
Humans and chimps have a last shared ancestor ca 5 million years ago *NM* - 25/03/2010 12:51:22 PM 139 Views
Yes, but - 25/03/2010 12:53:17 PM 413 Views
sounds like she would have been somewhere between Neanderthal and Homo Erectus - 25/03/2010 05:09:29 PM 369 Views
*NM* - 25/03/2010 05:11:51 PM 173 Views
oo that's awesome. *NM* - 25/03/2010 11:58:35 AM 160 Views
Re: Possible new human ancestor found in Siberia - 25/03/2010 04:21:03 PM 439 Views
DNA doesn't get weird because of that - 25/03/2010 04:42:45 PM 384 Views
Correct me if I'm wrong but... - 25/03/2010 04:54:51 PM 433 Views
You are wrong. - 25/03/2010 05:34:44 PM 376 Views
Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 06:40:49 PM 434 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 06:46:02 PM 382 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 06:50:07 PM 414 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 06:51:45 PM 413 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 07:12:00 PM 401 Views
fine - 25/03/2010 07:15:44 PM 370 Views
Good - 25/03/2010 07:25:10 PM 397 Views
it doesn't take much understanding of a gene sequence to place it. - 25/03/2010 05:41:18 PM 455 Views
Re: it doesn't take much understanding of a gene sequence to place it. - 25/03/2010 06:46:56 PM 528 Views
what would they have to find for you? - 25/03/2010 06:59:34 PM 325 Views
Re: what would they have to find for you? - 25/03/2010 07:16:47 PM 422 Views
okay, think of it this way then. - 25/03/2010 07:47:38 PM 389 Views
What the? You've been in my office? - 25/03/2010 08:09:08 PM 383 Views
you're neither - 25/03/2010 08:12:25 PM 348 Views
That's good. I was starting to worry about myself - 25/03/2010 08:22:42 PM 383 Views
*shake head* DNA analysis doesn't need more than a pinky finger. - 25/03/2010 04:42:45 PM 350 Views
Please reread what I said - 25/03/2010 04:56:32 PM 415 Views
Re: Please reread what I said - 25/03/2010 05:23:49 PM 373 Views
please learn to fire your neurons. - 25/03/2010 05:28:10 PM 379 Views
Re: please learn to fire your neurons. - 25/03/2010 05:35:51 PM 496 Views
living in a small city in Kansas - 25/03/2010 05:41:54 PM 347 Views
Re: living in a small city in Kansas - 25/03/2010 05:44:09 PM 418 Views
I give you permisison - 25/03/2010 05:44:47 PM 335 Views
My neurons fire just fine... sometimes - 25/03/2010 06:55:39 PM 469 Views
That headline is misleading - 25/03/2010 06:00:16 PM 350 Views

Reply to Message