Active Users:794 Time:30/01/2026 09:30:36 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong but... Kalazor Send a noteboard - 25/03/2010 04:54:51 PM
They can tell all that from an old pinky bone they dug up? Maybe it was just a person whose mother was also her sister or some such thing. Forgive me if I remain sceptical until they find something more than a pinky bone.

Well, they can extract DNA from fossilised mammoths, so why not a human(oid) pinky bone? Note that this does not give any information about looks, constitution or way-of-life, as stated in the article.


We've just recently "cracked" the DNA code right? I mean I'm no scientist, but if we're at the early stages of understanding DNA coding and sequences there is a lot that is subject to error. I'm certainly not saying it's not possible that she's a distant ancestor of humans I'm just not buying it, at the moment. I need something a bit more concrete than a pinky bone.

And doesn't generations of inbreeding cause all kinds of weird issues? Again, not saying this is the case, just asking.
RAFO's resident Husker Fanatic
GO BIG RED!!!
"Better Dead Than Sooner Red"
This message last edited by Kalazor on 25/03/2010 at 04:58:08 PM
Reply to message
Possible new human ancestor found in Siberia - 25/03/2010 03:26:22 AM 673 Views
Yes, I found that very exciting (link to new scientist article) - 25/03/2010 08:02:55 AM 438 Views
Humans and chimps have a last shared ancestor ca 5 million years ago *NM* - 25/03/2010 12:51:22 PM 160 Views
Yes, but - 25/03/2010 12:53:17 PM 467 Views
sounds like she would have been somewhere between Neanderthal and Homo Erectus - 25/03/2010 05:09:29 PM 414 Views
*NM* - 25/03/2010 05:11:51 PM 194 Views
oo that's awesome. *NM* - 25/03/2010 11:58:35 AM 178 Views
Re: Possible new human ancestor found in Siberia - 25/03/2010 04:21:03 PM 486 Views
DNA doesn't get weird because of that - 25/03/2010 04:42:45 PM 431 Views
Correct me if I'm wrong but... - 25/03/2010 04:54:51 PM 485 Views
You are wrong. - 25/03/2010 05:34:44 PM 428 Views
Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 06:40:49 PM 484 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 06:46:02 PM 432 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 06:50:07 PM 479 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 06:51:45 PM 461 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 07:12:00 PM 469 Views
fine - 25/03/2010 07:15:44 PM 421 Views
Good - 25/03/2010 07:25:10 PM 445 Views
it doesn't take much understanding of a gene sequence to place it. - 25/03/2010 05:41:18 PM 506 Views
Re: it doesn't take much understanding of a gene sequence to place it. - 25/03/2010 06:46:56 PM 595 Views
what would they have to find for you? - 25/03/2010 06:59:34 PM 374 Views
Re: what would they have to find for you? - 25/03/2010 07:16:47 PM 489 Views
okay, think of it this way then. - 25/03/2010 07:47:38 PM 437 Views
What the? You've been in my office? - 25/03/2010 08:09:08 PM 445 Views
you're neither - 25/03/2010 08:12:25 PM 400 Views
That's good. I was starting to worry about myself - 25/03/2010 08:22:42 PM 433 Views
*shake head* DNA analysis doesn't need more than a pinky finger. - 25/03/2010 04:42:45 PM 398 Views
Please reread what I said - 25/03/2010 04:56:32 PM 480 Views
Re: Please reread what I said - 25/03/2010 05:23:49 PM 428 Views
please learn to fire your neurons. - 25/03/2010 05:28:10 PM 427 Views
Re: please learn to fire your neurons. - 25/03/2010 05:35:51 PM 547 Views
living in a small city in Kansas - 25/03/2010 05:41:54 PM 403 Views
Re: living in a small city in Kansas - 25/03/2010 05:44:09 PM 469 Views
I give you permisison - 25/03/2010 05:44:47 PM 397 Views
My neurons fire just fine... sometimes - 25/03/2010 06:55:39 PM 520 Views
That headline is misleading - 25/03/2010 06:00:16 PM 399 Views

Reply to Message