Active Users:340 Time:19/06/2025 01:44:42 AM
Correct me if I'm wrong but... Kalazor Send a noteboard - 25/03/2010 04:54:51 PM
They can tell all that from an old pinky bone they dug up? Maybe it was just a person whose mother was also her sister or some such thing. Forgive me if I remain sceptical until they find something more than a pinky bone.

Well, they can extract DNA from fossilised mammoths, so why not a human(oid) pinky bone? Note that this does not give any information about looks, constitution or way-of-life, as stated in the article.


We've just recently "cracked" the DNA code right? I mean I'm no scientist, but if we're at the early stages of understanding DNA coding and sequences there is a lot that is subject to error. I'm certainly not saying it's not possible that she's a distant ancestor of humans I'm just not buying it, at the moment. I need something a bit more concrete than a pinky bone.

And doesn't generations of inbreeding cause all kinds of weird issues? Again, not saying this is the case, just asking.
RAFO's resident Husker Fanatic
GO BIG RED!!!
"Better Dead Than Sooner Red"
This message last edited by Kalazor on 25/03/2010 at 04:58:08 PM
Reply to message
Possible new human ancestor found in Siberia - 25/03/2010 03:26:22 AM 579 Views
Yes, I found that very exciting (link to new scientist article) - 25/03/2010 08:02:55 AM 377 Views
Humans and chimps have a last shared ancestor ca 5 million years ago *NM* - 25/03/2010 12:51:22 PM 136 Views
Yes, but - 25/03/2010 12:53:17 PM 402 Views
sounds like she would have been somewhere between Neanderthal and Homo Erectus - 25/03/2010 05:09:29 PM 359 Views
*NM* - 25/03/2010 05:11:51 PM 169 Views
oo that's awesome. *NM* - 25/03/2010 11:58:35 AM 156 Views
Re: Possible new human ancestor found in Siberia - 25/03/2010 04:21:03 PM 427 Views
DNA doesn't get weird because of that - 25/03/2010 04:42:45 PM 372 Views
Correct me if I'm wrong but... - 25/03/2010 04:54:51 PM 421 Views
You are wrong. - 25/03/2010 05:34:44 PM 364 Views
Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 06:40:49 PM 422 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 06:46:02 PM 371 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 06:50:07 PM 401 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 06:51:45 PM 403 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone - 25/03/2010 07:12:00 PM 389 Views
fine - 25/03/2010 07:15:44 PM 359 Views
Good - 25/03/2010 07:25:10 PM 385 Views
it doesn't take much understanding of a gene sequence to place it. - 25/03/2010 05:41:18 PM 445 Views
Re: it doesn't take much understanding of a gene sequence to place it. - 25/03/2010 06:46:56 PM 515 Views
what would they have to find for you? - 25/03/2010 06:59:34 PM 315 Views
Re: what would they have to find for you? - 25/03/2010 07:16:47 PM 409 Views
okay, think of it this way then. - 25/03/2010 07:47:38 PM 379 Views
What the? You've been in my office? - 25/03/2010 08:09:08 PM 371 Views
you're neither - 25/03/2010 08:12:25 PM 328 Views
That's good. I was starting to worry about myself - 25/03/2010 08:22:42 PM 373 Views
*shake head* DNA analysis doesn't need more than a pinky finger. - 25/03/2010 04:42:45 PM 339 Views
Please reread what I said - 25/03/2010 04:56:32 PM 404 Views
Re: Please reread what I said - 25/03/2010 05:23:49 PM 362 Views
please learn to fire your neurons. - 25/03/2010 05:28:10 PM 367 Views
Re: please learn to fire your neurons. - 25/03/2010 05:35:51 PM 483 Views
living in a small city in Kansas - 25/03/2010 05:41:54 PM 338 Views
Re: living in a small city in Kansas - 25/03/2010 05:44:09 PM 408 Views
I give you permisison - 25/03/2010 05:44:47 PM 322 Views
My neurons fire just fine... sometimes - 25/03/2010 06:55:39 PM 462 Views
That headline is misleading - 25/03/2010 06:00:16 PM 340 Views

Reply to Message