even a full skeleton would not place them in a phylogenetic tree. Ancestry is determined by genetics, not appearance. Otherwise people would correctly assume hyenas were Canids and Koalas actually were bears. They won't get some magically more detailed dna from finding the skull.
Honestly, with the exception of this conversation I've never really thought about it too much nor does it really bother me that I don't know.
I suppose more of the same would work for me. i.e. if they found another set of similar bones from a different person(I use person loosely) or two. One sample is a little small, it could be just an anomoly, at least that's the way my linear accountants mind works
RAFO's resident Husker Fanatic
GO BIG RED!!!
"Better Dead Than Sooner Red"
GO BIG RED!!!
"Better Dead Than Sooner Red"
Possible new human ancestor found in Siberia
- 25/03/2010 03:26:22 AM
726 Views
Yes, I found that very exciting (link to new scientist article)
- 25/03/2010 08:02:55 AM
493 Views
Humans and chimps have a last shared ancestor ca 5 million years ago *NM*
- 25/03/2010 12:51:22 PM
183 Views
Yes, but
- 25/03/2010 12:53:17 PM
518 Views
sounds like she would have been somewhere between Neanderthal and Homo Erectus
- 25/03/2010 05:09:29 PM
474 Views
Re: Possible new human ancestor found in Siberia
- 25/03/2010 04:21:03 PM
547 Views
DNA doesn't get weird because of that
- 25/03/2010 04:42:45 PM
482 Views
Correct me if I'm wrong but...
- 25/03/2010 04:54:51 PM
533 Views
You are wrong.
- 25/03/2010 05:34:44 PM
480 Views
Usually when you correct someone
- 25/03/2010 06:40:49 PM
543 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone
- 25/03/2010 06:46:02 PM
479 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone
- 25/03/2010 06:50:07 PM
533 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone
- 25/03/2010 06:51:45 PM
517 Views
it doesn't take much understanding of a gene sequence to place it.
- 25/03/2010 05:41:18 PM
560 Views
Re: it doesn't take much understanding of a gene sequence to place it.
- 25/03/2010 06:46:56 PM
652 Views
what would they have to find for you?
- 25/03/2010 06:59:34 PM
430 Views
Re: what would they have to find for you?
- 25/03/2010 07:16:47 PM
542 Views
okay, think of it this way then.
- 25/03/2010 07:47:38 PM
493 Views
What the? You've been in my office?
- 25/03/2010 08:09:08 PM
501 Views
*shake head* DNA analysis doesn't need more than a pinky finger.
- 25/03/2010 04:42:45 PM
456 Views
Please reread what I said
- 25/03/2010 04:56:32 PM
543 Views
please learn to fire your neurons.
- 25/03/2010 05:28:10 PM
480 Views
Re: please learn to fire your neurons.
- 25/03/2010 05:35:51 PM
604 Views
living in a small city in Kansas
- 25/03/2010 05:41:54 PM
485 Views

*NM*