Active Users:421 Time:04/09/2025 08:53:33 PM
Both, in certain areas. nossy Send a noteboard - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM
There are a lot of healthy food that doesn't cost that much to eat. With smart shopping fresh produce isn't expensive. Wheat bread cost the same as white bread and even the fancy multi grain bread isn't that much more expensive.

But multi-grain IS more expensive, and wheat is the same as eating white in most cases. So what if multi-grain is more? Well, think about multiplying that times all 50 of the items you're buying. If the healthy option is a couple bucks more expensive in every case, it adds up.

And convenient foods are crap, so you have to think ahead to be healthy, in most cases. That's not always easy.
Reply to message
Wow! Weight and Diet info for women in America. - 04/09/2009 07:11:28 PM 1409 Views
Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:29:59 PM 715 Views
Re: Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:34:46 PM 784 Views
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM 672 Views
Both, in certain areas. - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM 739 Views
yes. - 07/09/2009 12:06:42 AM 761 Views
Well also... - 07/09/2009 12:05:48 AM 806 Views
Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:06:19 PM 866 Views
Re: Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:10:30 PM 716 Views
But when did "beautiful" come to mean "beloved"? - 04/09/2009 09:37:41 PM 703 Views
No I mean beautiful - 05/09/2009 07:00:23 AM 943 Views
Hrm - 04/09/2009 07:43:12 PM 803 Views
I also thought the 5'7" 100 pound size 8 was wack. - 04/09/2009 07:46:49 PM 768 Views
*shrugs* I dn't know too much about weight and such from the woman perspective. - 04/09/2009 07:53:01 PM 758 Views
Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:11:22 PM 778 Views
Re: Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:13:06 PM 721 Views
You're not 5'8" - 04/09/2009 08:02:32 PM 690 Views
Yes I am. - 04/09/2009 08:06:33 PM 708 Views
Yes she is. - 06/09/2009 04:02:52 PM 838 Views
To be fair, - 06/09/2009 04:05:55 PM 789 Views
ha! - 06/09/2009 04:07:45 PM 822 Views
5'8" here... - 05/09/2009 02:28:52 AM 725 Views
Yes. - 04/09/2009 08:50:41 PM 674 Views
Are they British sizes? - 04/09/2009 09:01:01 PM 699 Views
It would make more sense... - 04/09/2009 09:17:20 PM 655 Views
I wondered that too - 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM 714 Views
Wait do British sizes start at 6? - 06/09/2009 04:06:31 PM 810 Views
Uh I'm not actually sure - 06/09/2009 08:03:29 PM 926 Views
Yes though - 07/09/2009 12:03:11 AM 790 Views
No, American. - 04/09/2009 09:40:36 PM 1165 Views
Er, that was me. - 04/09/2009 09:41:15 PM 732 Views
Did you mean 14 British is huge? - 04/09/2009 09:43:37 PM 757 Views
Okay, let's be relative. - 04/09/2009 09:47:21 PM 716 Views
Erm.... - 05/09/2009 01:08:16 AM 752 Views
I have to doubt some of their facts. - 04/09/2009 08:13:43 PM 675 Views
Some stats do seem a bit extreme... - 04/09/2009 09:23:10 PM 682 Views
well, someone who is 5'4" and 140 lbs isn't a size 14, I don't think... - 05/09/2009 12:26:34 AM 771 Views
It's not. - 06/09/2009 05:29:27 AM 849 Views
O.O *NM* - 04/09/2009 08:15:25 PM 379 Views
interesting and scary... - 05/09/2009 12:28:05 AM 695 Views
100 lbs is a lot smaller than a size 8...more like a 0/2/4 *NM* - 05/09/2009 12:59:36 AM 373 Views
I actually - 06/09/2009 04:08:24 PM 775 Views
My niece weighs 90lbs - 06/09/2009 10:04:51 PM 761 Views
exactly! *NM* - 07/09/2009 12:03:35 AM 395 Views

Reply to Message