Active Users:754 Time:17/02/2026 06:28:57 AM
Both, in certain areas. nossy Send a noteboard - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM
There are a lot of healthy food that doesn't cost that much to eat. With smart shopping fresh produce isn't expensive. Wheat bread cost the same as white bread and even the fancy multi grain bread isn't that much more expensive.

But multi-grain IS more expensive, and wheat is the same as eating white in most cases. So what if multi-grain is more? Well, think about multiplying that times all 50 of the items you're buying. If the healthy option is a couple bucks more expensive in every case, it adds up.

And convenient foods are crap, so you have to think ahead to be healthy, in most cases. That's not always easy.
Reply to message
Wow! Weight and Diet info for women in America. - 04/09/2009 07:11:28 PM 1516 Views
Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:29:59 PM 789 Views
Re: Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:34:46 PM 855 Views
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM 748 Views
Both, in certain areas. - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM 813 Views
yes. - 07/09/2009 12:06:42 AM 857 Views
Well also... - 07/09/2009 12:05:48 AM 881 Views
Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:06:19 PM 953 Views
Re: Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:10:30 PM 784 Views
But when did "beautiful" come to mean "beloved"? - 04/09/2009 09:37:41 PM 788 Views
No I mean beautiful - 05/09/2009 07:00:23 AM 1052 Views
Hrm - 04/09/2009 07:43:12 PM 886 Views
I also thought the 5'7" 100 pound size 8 was wack. - 04/09/2009 07:46:49 PM 853 Views
*shrugs* I dn't know too much about weight and such from the woman perspective. - 04/09/2009 07:53:01 PM 831 Views
Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:11:22 PM 847 Views
Re: Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:13:06 PM 814 Views
You're not 5'8" - 04/09/2009 08:02:32 PM 772 Views
Yes I am. - 04/09/2009 08:06:33 PM 786 Views
Yes she is. - 06/09/2009 04:02:52 PM 899 Views
To be fair, - 06/09/2009 04:05:55 PM 871 Views
ha! - 06/09/2009 04:07:45 PM 896 Views
5'8" here... - 05/09/2009 02:28:52 AM 816 Views
Yes. - 04/09/2009 08:50:41 PM 757 Views
Are they British sizes? - 04/09/2009 09:01:01 PM 784 Views
It would make more sense... - 04/09/2009 09:17:20 PM 724 Views
I wondered that too - 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM 805 Views
Wait do British sizes start at 6? - 06/09/2009 04:06:31 PM 891 Views
Uh I'm not actually sure - 06/09/2009 08:03:29 PM 1010 Views
Yes though - 07/09/2009 12:03:11 AM 870 Views
No, American. - 04/09/2009 09:40:36 PM 1247 Views
Er, that was me. - 04/09/2009 09:41:15 PM 827 Views
Did you mean 14 British is huge? - 04/09/2009 09:43:37 PM 831 Views
Okay, let's be relative. - 04/09/2009 09:47:21 PM 792 Views
Erm.... - 05/09/2009 01:08:16 AM 824 Views
I have to doubt some of their facts. - 04/09/2009 08:13:43 PM 762 Views
Some stats do seem a bit extreme... - 04/09/2009 09:23:10 PM 788 Views
well, someone who is 5'4" and 140 lbs isn't a size 14, I don't think... - 05/09/2009 12:26:34 AM 865 Views
It's not. - 06/09/2009 05:29:27 AM 927 Views
O.O *NM* - 04/09/2009 08:15:25 PM 419 Views
interesting and scary... - 05/09/2009 12:28:05 AM 777 Views
100 lbs is a lot smaller than a size 8...more like a 0/2/4 *NM* - 05/09/2009 12:59:36 AM 408 Views
I actually - 06/09/2009 04:08:24 PM 852 Views
My niece weighs 90lbs - 06/09/2009 10:04:51 PM 833 Views
exactly! *NM* - 07/09/2009 12:03:35 AM 424 Views

Reply to Message