Active Users:805 Time:01/09/2026 11:02:37 AM
Don't forget the roll to make sure he lands on the creature. LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 16/06/2010 08:59:42 AM
That'd probably be a Jump skill check or a Dexterity check, depending on the DM's discretion. Possibly some sort of other check to verify that he manages to grip the monster enough to remain upon it initially (as in doesn't just splat on him and slip off). That would probably be after the dmg rolls (Assuming contact), and probably only if the DM was anal.

so, it'd be something like:

roll to land, attack/dmg rolls mentioned above, roll to determine if your landing "stuck" , rolls to continue to stay on (the ride-type rolls mentioned)

Given the different physics, I would put the "sticking" roll different to the 'riding" rolls, but that's just me personally.

but yah. your dm's just being lazy/a dick. There's no reason within the rules or physics that this shouldn't be allowed.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
This message last edited by LadyLorraine on 16/06/2010 at 09:05:05 AM
Reply to message
Riding a hostile creature - 15/06/2010 09:58:07 PM 911 Views
Your DM was being a dick. - 16/06/2010 02:08:17 AM 834 Views
Don't forget the roll to make sure he lands on the creature. - 16/06/2010 08:59:42 AM 853 Views
And if you are playing 4th ed, which kicks 3.5's ass ( ), then you'd do something similar. - 16/06/2010 09:33:10 PM 780 Views
mm. two things that bother me about 4th edition - 17/06/2010 05:16:07 AM 760 Views
Yep. - 18/06/2010 12:28:08 AM 726 Views
I don't much mind 4th edition, wasn't trying to make a big argument - 18/06/2010 01:09:01 PM 754 Views
Oh, I know. - 18/06/2010 06:19:05 PM 729 Views
Also: I'm confused by what you mean when you say "core" classes. - 18/06/2010 04:26:59 AM 702 Views
I'm talking about the classes which DnD has always associated with as "Core" - 18/06/2010 01:27:27 PM 756 Views
Those ARE all in the Player's Handbook 1. - 18/06/2010 06:16:45 PM 744 Views
Yah, I was just signing on to say that they seem to have fixed that - 19/06/2010 06:07:43 AM 760 Views
Well... 3rd edition had about a million books. So that's not exactly a new trend *NM* - 19/06/2010 03:56:20 PM 308 Views
yah i know... - 21/06/2010 08:29:29 AM 734 Views
Agreed. Ihaven't DM'd since 2nd edition, but : - 18/06/2010 09:25:41 AM 828 Views
depending on how complicated you wanted to make it... - 18/06/2010 01:30:37 PM 740 Views
Indeed. The number 1 rule for any DM: never say no. If a player wants to do something, let them try. - 18/06/2010 06:31:20 PM 779 Views
you should make them make a charisma check - 19/06/2010 06:09:21 AM 706 Views
Rule -1: Without players, the DM is powerless. - 21/06/2010 06:54:15 PM 963 Views
Bad DM.....bad boy! *NM* - 16/06/2010 06:06:03 PM 317 Views

Reply to Message