Active Users:192 Time:19/05/2024 09:03:43 AM
Roaches are pretty good though BlackAdder Send a noteboard - 19/10/2010 12:14:53 AM
Either that or you have bupkiss unit production because you went straight to lair and sacrificed getting a queen.

They're not wasted units by any means. Vs. MMM, Roach/hydra is pretty good, as is Roach/baneling/infestor. If your plan is to go muta/baneling then I suppose the roaches aren't great, but still throw them into your attack, they're good. Vs. Protoss, they're pretty resilient against Psi storm and can tank enough damage for your infestors to mind control colossi. Mass roach is not bad unless you're going against mass marauders, immortals, or air units :P
Reply to message
Starcraft II Patch 1.1.2 - 15/10/2010 06:31:08 PM 766 Views
I've never really used Void Rays anyway, - 15/10/2010 10:07:32 PM 401 Views
This is true. I play team games pretty much exclusively. *NM* - 16/10/2010 07:07:20 AM 184 Views
Balancing the least played and weakest race doesn't make it the best. - 16/10/2010 07:06:43 AM 434 Views
Re: Balancing the least played and weakest race doesn't make it the best. - 16/10/2010 08:11:19 PM 404 Views
I think the first patch pretty much leveled out the playing field. - 16/10/2010 11:57:31 PM 394 Views
No joke... - 18/10/2010 06:03:51 PM 393 Views
Exactly. And if you get roaches, your midgame gets mad delayed. - 18/10/2010 06:28:28 PM 374 Views
Getting a queen....(here's my typical build order) - 18/10/2010 08:25:17 PM 396 Views
I'm way too much of a coward to do early expansion builds. - 18/10/2010 11:07:04 PM 410 Views
No guts, no glory dude - 19/10/2010 04:57:08 PM 351 Views
Roaches are pretty good though - 19/10/2010 12:14:53 AM 549 Views
I've had trouble getting used to Roaches since my return to 1v1. - 19/10/2010 03:31:00 AM 364 Views
as a random player I think terran got overnerfed - 18/10/2010 04:13:18 PM 531 Views
Agreed - 19/10/2010 12:48:02 AM 537 Views
Terrans are still quite good - 19/10/2010 08:17:34 PM 350 Views
As a zerg specialist.... - 18/10/2010 05:56:04 PM 405 Views

Reply to Message