Active Users:472 Time:04/05/2025 01:05:51 AM
Roaches are pretty good though BlackAdder Send a noteboard - 19/10/2010 12:14:53 AM
Either that or you have bupkiss unit production because you went straight to lair and sacrificed getting a queen.

They're not wasted units by any means. Vs. MMM, Roach/hydra is pretty good, as is Roach/baneling/infestor. If your plan is to go muta/baneling then I suppose the roaches aren't great, but still throw them into your attack, they're good. Vs. Protoss, they're pretty resilient against Psi storm and can tank enough damage for your infestors to mind control colossi. Mass roach is not bad unless you're going against mass marauders, immortals, or air units :P
Reply to message
Starcraft II Patch 1.1.2 - 15/10/2010 06:31:08 PM 851 Views
I've never really used Void Rays anyway, - 15/10/2010 10:07:32 PM 493 Views
This is true. I play team games pretty much exclusively. *NM* - 16/10/2010 07:07:20 AM 216 Views
Balancing the least played and weakest race doesn't make it the best. - 16/10/2010 07:06:43 AM 520 Views
Re: Balancing the least played and weakest race doesn't make it the best. - 16/10/2010 08:11:19 PM 483 Views
I think the first patch pretty much leveled out the playing field. - 16/10/2010 11:57:31 PM 478 Views
No joke... - 18/10/2010 06:03:51 PM 478 Views
Exactly. And if you get roaches, your midgame gets mad delayed. - 18/10/2010 06:28:28 PM 453 Views
Getting a queen....(here's my typical build order) - 18/10/2010 08:25:17 PM 480 Views
I'm way too much of a coward to do early expansion builds. - 18/10/2010 11:07:04 PM 495 Views
No guts, no glory dude - 19/10/2010 04:57:08 PM 431 Views
Roaches are pretty good though - 19/10/2010 12:14:53 AM 633 Views
I've had trouble getting used to Roaches since my return to 1v1. - 19/10/2010 03:31:00 AM 447 Views
as a random player I think terran got overnerfed - 18/10/2010 04:13:18 PM 622 Views
Agreed - 19/10/2010 12:48:02 AM 624 Views
Terrans are still quite good - 19/10/2010 08:17:34 PM 438 Views
As a zerg specialist.... - 18/10/2010 05:56:04 PM 493 Views

Reply to Message