Active Users:536 Time:01/07/2025 10:49:30 PM
One thing you didn't mention is what resolution you're trying to run at. Aemon Send a noteboard - 29/10/2010 05:07:38 PM
If you're running 1680 x 1050, your 5670 should be able to run most games (including Cataclysm) on very high settings. Without testing it I don't know what "Ultra" entails, but you should be able to run near the top of the settings spectrum. This is assuming that you have a decent processor and enough RAM, obviously. If you can't, something is probably wrong. Definitely update the drivers; you should see noticeable improvements, but don't expect night and day.

If you're trying to run 1920 x 1200, you'll only be able to run most games on low details. If this is the resolution you're using, then your results sound pretty standard to me, and you shouldn't expect to improve much no matter what you try. I would recommend against trying to overclock the card if you don't know what you're doing, and can't easily afford a replacement.

If I were you, I'd update your drivers, and see what you think. If you're not happy with the results, or if you're determined to game at 1920, return your card, and buy a 5770. This should set you back about $150, and, in my opinion, is probably the best bang-for-your-buck card out there in the 1920 arena.

Good luck. :)
Reply to message
In need of graphics card advice. (edit with update) - 29/10/2010 04:01:37 PM 635 Views
That's the card in my new iMac. Well, according to Apple, at least... - 29/10/2010 04:45:19 PM 529 Views
A 9800GT is roughly equivalent to a 5670. *NM* - 29/10/2010 04:58:07 PM 247 Views
I've no problem deferring to someone more familiar w/ recent cards. - 29/10/2010 05:44:20 PM 422 Views
Each architecture is different and better at different things. - 29/10/2010 08:16:14 PM 375 Views
Your card isn't an ati hd5670, it is about 75% as fast as an 8800gt - 01/11/2010 01:34:47 AM 511 Views
Good to know. - 01/11/2010 01:45:15 PM 365 Views
One thing you didn't mention is what resolution you're trying to run at. - 29/10/2010 05:07:38 PM 385 Views
System specs: - 29/10/2010 05:39:19 PM 378 Views
Re: System specs: - 29/10/2010 08:22:38 PM 390 Views
Re: System specs: - 29/10/2010 09:30:24 PM 357 Views
I was looking at this card as well for a new system build - 29/10/2010 06:22:20 PM 444 Views
Re: I was looking at this card as well for a new system build - 29/10/2010 06:35:30 PM 441 Views
Thanks for the update! This makes my choice easy *NM* - 31/10/2010 02:56:38 AM 197 Views
You're welcome *NM* - 31/10/2010 01:12:00 PM 171 Views
The HD5670 is meant to be a casual gamer card - 31/10/2010 02:23:45 PM 445 Views
Nice to know that someone selling these actually knows what they're talking about. - 01/11/2010 01:42:31 PM 374 Views
Fry's Electronics *NM* - 01/11/2010 01:45:23 PM 180 Views
If you do return the card, these are the cards I would recommend (links inside to newegg) - 01/11/2010 02:32:23 AM 415 Views
Excellent post - 01/11/2010 05:06:10 PM 561 Views
The 460 is a better card than a 465 - 02/11/2010 03:11:10 AM 350 Views
And FPS per dollar isn't the only important stat - 02/11/2010 03:14:10 AM 361 Views
Re: And FPS per dollar isn't the only important stat - 02/11/2010 12:52:46 PM 398 Views
Don't get me wrong, I agree the HD5770 is an awesome card - 02/11/2010 06:14:16 PM 489 Views
Re: Don't get me wrong, I agree the HD5770 is an awesome card - 02/11/2010 08:01:21 PM 360 Views
Re: Don't get me wrong, I agree the HD5770 is an awesome card - 02/11/2010 09:19:44 PM 537 Views
Do you already have a computer or are you building a new one? If so what are the specs? And .... - 03/11/2010 10:49:35 AM 379 Views
Well - 03/11/2010 08:31:11 PM 550 Views
Sorry I remember now - 03/11/2010 11:41:14 PM 401 Views
Re: Sorry I remember now - 04/11/2010 05:45:22 PM 545 Views
If you are not going to overclock, you should really consider this computer - 04/11/2010 12:28:44 AM 528 Views
Re: If you are not going to overclock, you should really consider this computer - 04/11/2010 06:02:57 PM 376 Views
HP doesn't use homemade harddrives - 04/11/2010 07:41:35 PM 388 Views

Reply to Message