Active Users:406 Time:02/05/2025 03:52:04 AM
Haven't read the book but the tv series is quite excellent. *NM* Urza Send a noteboard - 07/12/2017 02:39:20 AM

View original post
I just started it, I read the first chronological novel (Sharpe's Tiger, 1799), which is well down the order of publication. To this point, my main question is, does it matter in what order they are read? I haven't seen anything so far to indicate I'm doing it wrong, but in book two, I noticed a character being given a prominent introduction, with narrative weight, despite his seemingly insignificant role. This makes me think he's someone whom readers who are more familiar with Sharpe's future adventures and companions will recognize.

Also, I can't help but feel this General Arthur Wellesly is going to be important somehow.

But seriously, any opinions?

Also-also, any word on the TV movies, with Sean Bean? Those last three words strongly incline me to watching it, and I saw on IMdB that Pete Postlewaite plays Sgt. Hakeswill, which I think is just inspired. Is the series any good? Are there books that pertain directly to certain episodes that should be considered if one is trying to avoid having one medium spoil the other? How does the screen compare to the print?


Reply to message
Anyone familiar with Bernard Cornwell's Sharpe series? - 04/12/2017 12:37:33 AM 543 Views
Nope, can't help you there. Sounds interesting though. *NM* - 05/12/2017 06:20:48 PM 232 Views
never read this one - 06/12/2017 04:11:41 PM 452 Views
damn it. *NM* - 06/12/2017 04:11:41 PM 185 Views
we should call double posting mooking *NM* - 06/12/2017 07:56:31 PM 200 Views
It's my damned work laptop - 06/12/2017 08:05:16 PM 421 Views
Jeezus you can't make it up *NM* - 06/12/2017 08:05:16 PM 205 Views
Haven't read the book but the tv series is quite excellent. *NM* - 07/12/2017 02:39:20 AM 258 Views

Reply to Message