Active Users:454 Time:18/09/2025 01:56:55 AM
I suppose, but... TyrReborn Send a noteboard - 04/04/2019 06:30:02 PM

not everything has to be a perfect recreation to be really fun to play. I believe the spell system in this style of game could be very adequate in replicating the effects of channeling, if not the actions themselves.

And balance is no problem. Like... you get yourself one of the broken race/class combinations in the bg games, and you can straight up solo every boss in the game. So, I really don't see the issue here either.

So in summary, I couldn't disagree more. Unless your big thing is wanting to "do" channeling, but... I mean, items can even work like ter'angreal. It seems perfect.

Oh, oh! There's things that can modify your caster level, too, so you could use those to mimic the differences in channeling ability.

Seriously, I think this would be great.

Reply to message
Have any of you ever played Baldur's Gate? - 04/04/2019 05:15:50 AM 735 Views
Re: Have any of you ever played Baldur's Gate? - 04/04/2019 08:59:49 AM 521 Views
Right? Beamdog needs to do this. - 04/04/2019 06:32:50 PM 539 Views
Channeling would be rather hard to get right in a video game. - 04/04/2019 09:27:49 AM 544 Views
I suppose, but... - 04/04/2019 06:30:02 PM 547 Views
... Seriously, non-channelers CAN'T fight channelers head on. - 05/04/2019 06:37:57 PM 509 Views
... I think you're thinking too big. - 06/04/2019 03:47:21 AM 538 Views
I was agreeing with Dunstan, but indeed, it would work better with the early books. - 06/04/2019 12:17:05 PM 545 Views
It... Didn't exactly go out of it's way to stick to the lore. - 06/04/2019 04:13:13 PM 507 Views
I did - 07/04/2019 08:06:59 AM 540 Views
Re: Have any of you ever played Baldur's Gate? - 04/04/2019 05:16:58 PM 548 Views
You don't have to recreate the actions of channeling. - 04/04/2019 06:31:26 PM 538 Views
Go for the eyes Boo! Go for the eyes! *NM* - 08/04/2019 09:13:41 AM 289 Views
I am armed to the teeth and packing a hamster! Minsc <3 *NM* - 09/04/2019 06:57:59 AM 250 Views

Reply to Message