Active Users:734 Time:18/12/2025 07:10:40 AM
I suppose, but... TyrReborn Send a noteboard - 04/04/2019 06:30:02 PM

not everything has to be a perfect recreation to be really fun to play. I believe the spell system in this style of game could be very adequate in replicating the effects of channeling, if not the actions themselves.

And balance is no problem. Like... you get yourself one of the broken race/class combinations in the bg games, and you can straight up solo every boss in the game. So, I really don't see the issue here either.

So in summary, I couldn't disagree more. Unless your big thing is wanting to "do" channeling, but... I mean, items can even work like ter'angreal. It seems perfect.

Oh, oh! There's things that can modify your caster level, too, so you could use those to mimic the differences in channeling ability.

Seriously, I think this would be great.

Reply to message
Have any of you ever played Baldur's Gate? - 04/04/2019 05:15:50 AM 787 Views
Re: Have any of you ever played Baldur's Gate? - 04/04/2019 08:59:49 AM 561 Views
Right? Beamdog needs to do this. - 04/04/2019 06:32:50 PM 605 Views
Channeling would be rather hard to get right in a video game. - 04/04/2019 09:27:49 AM 590 Views
I suppose, but... - 04/04/2019 06:30:02 PM 599 Views
... Seriously, non-channelers CAN'T fight channelers head on. - 05/04/2019 06:37:57 PM 576 Views
... I think you're thinking too big. - 06/04/2019 03:47:21 AM 617 Views
I was agreeing with Dunstan, but indeed, it would work better with the early books. - 06/04/2019 12:17:05 PM 587 Views
It... Didn't exactly go out of it's way to stick to the lore. - 06/04/2019 04:13:13 PM 565 Views
I did - 07/04/2019 08:06:59 AM 580 Views
Re: Have any of you ever played Baldur's Gate? - 04/04/2019 05:16:58 PM 591 Views
You don't have to recreate the actions of channeling. - 04/04/2019 06:31:26 PM 604 Views
Go for the eyes Boo! Go for the eyes! *NM* - 08/04/2019 09:13:41 AM 326 Views
I am armed to the teeth and packing a hamster! Minsc <3 *NM* - 09/04/2019 06:57:59 AM 266 Views

Reply to Message