But a statement by the CIA is hardly worthy of an admonition to "Get your story right". Maybe CNN is full of it. Maybe the CIA is telling the truth. Or the CNN story could be true, in spite of a CIA denial.
But seriously, why would anyone take a public statement by the CIA at face value? They are literally in the disinformation business. Additionally, the CIA would have good reason to defend the guy that has power over their jobs.
As for CNN, I suppose many would say they are in the disinformation business too. The water is definitely muddy.
A little learning is a dangerous thing.
This message last edited by Narg on 10/09/2019 at 04:18:41 PM
US forced to extract highest level Russian spy due to Trump buffoonery.
- 10/09/2019 10:25:55 AM
657 Views
CIA refuted this story with respect to Trump
- 10/09/2019 02:48:25 PM
423 Views
Case closed! Public statements by spy agencies are notoriously trustworthy. *NM*
- 10/09/2019 03:04:45 PM
135 Views
So I can just publish any stupid shit I want to and if the CIA refutes it then I'm right? *NM*
- 10/09/2019 03:07:01 PM
148 Views
Didn't say that. I don't know the truth here.
- 10/09/2019 04:16:09 PM
279 Views
And there's no speculation about the guy's identity: Oleg Smolenkov
- 10/09/2019 03:01:41 PM
412 Views
What is happening with Trumps foreign policy within the last week?
- 10/09/2019 10:12:38 PM
285 Views