Is it alive? Or is it not alive?

If it is alive... then it is a life. If you kill it.... what exactly is it that you are killing? A human being? A human being at an early stage of life?

Why do we get to say that this human being in its early stage of life is allowed to die? That its life is worthless?

Do you think there should be any restrictions on abortion? Like... 24 weeks? 8 months? 3rd trimester? Or is it okay to kill the human being up until the point they are born? After? Your subjective feelings on when you'd rather not see them done is important. Why is that? because it "looks" like a baby? Acts like a baby? That's an irrational viewpoint if you REALLY believe its hasn't gone through its physiological change yet that deems it a baby.

You're saying that a physiological change to that human being is what determines we can kill her/him or not? Why is that physiological change the determination for what can be killed and not killed? Why is THAT the distinction as opposed to conception for example? Or the physiological change that it first went through? or the second physiological change? why THAT physiological change so far down the list? Is this an arbitrary distinction?

One other thing? Why does the left make the argument about women's choice? If the right isn't interested in arguing about the woman's choice... only about whether its a life you're killing or not? Why don't they use science to beat the hell out of those arguments. Show the right that science actually IS on the side of abortions. And the right will open up to abortion for all up until birth. BOOM! easiest way to win! Why does the left revert away from science. And start talking about feelings and convenience and injustices?