Active Users:198 Time:24/04/2024 12:27:44 PM
Re: The ineligible man downfield call that wiped the TD was particularly egregious. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 27/11/2022 02:21:20 AM

He was engaged with a defender the whole time, and when they separated, he moved backward toward the line of scrimmage.

I don't even understand why that penalty is on the books. It does not fit with the NFL's whole offensive promotion agenda, nor does having a blocker downfield impart any real advantage in the passing game. At most, it distracts the quarterback and creates situations where he might throw to an ineligible man by mistake. Judging by highlight reels, people like to see sacks and downfield completions and broken field runs. An interior lineman downfield does not prevent either of the former, and enhances the possibility of the latter, in the case of a screen pass or run-pass option play.

Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
What the hell, Monday? Since when are you Friday? - 25/11/2022 11:08:39 PM 231 Views
The ineligible man downfield call that wiped the TD was particularly egregious. *NM* - 26/11/2022 08:28:17 PM 39 Views
Re: The ineligible man downfield call that wiped the TD was particularly egregious. - 27/11/2022 02:21:20 AM 78 Views

Reply to Message