Personally, I think it's very likely that we have nothing to hide in game terms from our DF backgrounds. Of course, a rapist wants to hide he's a rapist IC, because he'll be hung from the nearest tree if he confesses, but in game terms (not to mention IC as a DF, plus the fact that there are no real trees nearby
) nothing will come from it. Maybe some RP moaning, shouting, accusations, disgust etc. Most of us are likely to be murderers, con-men, or what-have-you anyway.
The only thing you really want to hide, I would say, is your role, if you have one, but that's no different from normal games. Since roles are usually assigned randomly, I doubt a person claiming to be something IC (for example, a channeler as two have already done) would also imply something about their in-game-role. If channeler means role, I doubt the two would have claimed channeler so fast. This is even more likely, since the background was not assigned by the mod, but was rather chosen by the player themselves. At most the roles were then tailored a bit to fit the role, but with only a few players, I doubt there are many roles anyway.
Maybe we need to have a distinction between lying IC and OOC? If that is even possible. I will need to think on this a bit more, but I'm just throwing it out there to facilitate the discussion.
Any other thoughts?
) nothing will come from it. Maybe some RP moaning, shouting, accusations, disgust etc. Most of us are likely to be murderers, con-men, or what-have-you anyway.The only thing you really want to hide, I would say, is your role, if you have one, but that's no different from normal games. Since roles are usually assigned randomly, I doubt a person claiming to be something IC (for example, a channeler as two have already done) would also imply something about their in-game-role. If channeler means role, I doubt the two would have claimed channeler so fast. This is even more likely, since the background was not assigned by the mod, but was rather chosen by the player themselves. At most the roles were then tailored a bit to fit the role, but with only a few players, I doubt there are many roles anyway.
Maybe we need to have a distinction between lying IC and OOC? If that is even possible. I will need to think on this a bit more, but I'm just throwing it out there to facilitate the discussion.
Any other thoughts?
The mystery deepens... I think. *MySmiley*
RPMafia - GAME OVER
- 29/05/2010 09:58:50 AM
977 Views
Come on people, whatcha waiting for?
- 31/05/2010 07:30:36 PM
751 Views
I'm waiting for a few more details I asked Kylia about before posting. Shouldn't be too long. *NM*
- 31/05/2010 08:16:25 PM
306 Views
So...
- 02/06/2010 09:15:03 PM
739 Views
*snicker*
- 03/06/2010 09:38:13 AM
669 Views
It was actually a question to other players as to the procedure to be followed under circumstances. *NM*
- 03/06/2010 07:04:43 PM
307 Views
My thoughts
- 03/06/2010 08:00:35 PM
738 Views
Well, we're all paranoid and unwilling to offer up information that might be useful to our rivals.
- 03/06/2010 09:12:01 PM
685 Views
There is a game transcript attached to the main post now which I will be periodically updating. *NM*
- 03/06/2010 10:29:44 AM
366 Views
Roles
- 08/06/2010 04:10:44 PM
663 Views
Wait, is it Night already? *NM*
- 08/06/2010 05:43:01 PM
317 Views
Nope, we've got 'till Friday. That's why I'm trying to get this moving. *NM*
- 08/06/2010 06:30:00 PM
325 Views
Yeah, sorry about planning to kill you.
- 08/06/2010 09:37:43 PM
659 Views
Info still needed
- 12/06/2010 02:48:33 PM
715 Views
Vote: Kronin al' Sulc
- 17/06/2010 10:24:57 PM
670 Views
Heh. It's still Night isn't it? And a vote is not one to Lynch, but to appoint the Lyncher *NM*
- 18/06/2010 09:29:46 AM
339 Views
Am I missing something?
- 24/06/2010 02:47:27 PM
685 Views
Re: Am I missing something?
- 25/06/2010 12:06:07 AM
688 Views
clarifications *sigh*
- 01/07/2010 06:04:58 AM
686 Views
If we hit the deadline, will the majority necessary to vote be turned into a plurality?
- 01/07/2010 06:06:44 AM
670 Views

*NM*
*NM*