Active Users:219 Time:29/03/2024 12:49:29 AM
Which is pretty much the point. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 10/06/2010 05:39:36 PM
A dead townie seems like a loss, but in reality, it is not that much of one. Sure, it might depend on individuals and roles, but as a rule, the only value of conservation of townies is that as long as townies are superior in numbers to scum, we can lynch them. However, as I have demonstrated, saving one townie by not-lynching will not give us more opportunities to lynch a scummer, it will in fact give us less.

There are good reasons to push for a lynch on day 1, but we do not benefit from a dead townie, so it's major advantage is that when we go no lynch a lot it yanks teeth from the threat to go after people who aren't assisting us in finding info. We do not absolutely have to lop of someone's head on day 1 just to prove we're willing to.

Give Nothing? You think it's a freakish coincidence that we've never killed a DF on day 1 of a single game I've been a DF in? Never even came close. Decreasing our number of chances for a kill is not a bad thing, for the same reason a weapon set to single shot is better than one on full auto, especially when firing at a crowd composed mostly of people you don't want to hit. By this logic, no vig should ever miss a chance to make a night kill. If there are X players, his odds of killing a DF are better than random because he'll always be shooting a X-1 instead of X, since he's not a DF. Also, you're prior demonstrations ignore that night does not belong to the scummers, it belongs to those with night actions, which usually includes more townies than scum.


There is a significant difference between a lynch and a vigilante night kill in that a lynch provides a voting record. Has there ever been a lynch of a townie in which Darkfriends were not involved? The voting record allows us to focus more efficiently on the scum by removing nearly half of all players from the immediate suspect list. Sure, there will be scum in that group too, probably, but we can afford to wait for them to make some mistakes as well. The vigilante, on the other hand, leaves us with only a net loss of townies if he fails. We don't even know if he was trying to get a scummer or if he was a serial killer or other faction. That's why lynching is invaluable, and vigilantism requires more caution.

I can list of a number of reasons why it was the right move at the time, an action isn't mistake just because later info makes it the wrong one, let me remind you, I did cop him and get a guilty hit back. Had it gone one to day 2, I likely would have been able to use that to first isolate a number of people as prob-town and prob-scum, then get a lynch.


If he had simply been lynched, you could have investigated someone else, the game would have gone on to Day 2, and we already had a fairly accurate list of scum just from the no-lynch voters. What you're arguing is that you can find a number of reasons while shooting yourself in the leg was a good idea: because you have two legs.

Yes, that's rather expected, but I think you should probably take moment to remind yourself that odds are most players will rightfully interpret this as you simply voting from an opportunity to do so, not from any legitimate reason to think I'm a DF.


You'd think the fact that you're promoting blatantly anti-town behaviour would be evidence enough, but yes, I know from past experience that no matter how scummy you are, it will be near impossible to lynch you.

I did give reasons, you're ignoring them. You're also, with your vote, blatant ignoring something else: If I am a DF, how do I possibly profit from this? Considering I just said, and the evidence is entirely on my side, that every time I've been a DF I've viewed a day 1 lynch as a free kill. What, am I now a strategic incompetent, sacrificing one of my best tools? Or maybe it's exactly as I said, I've never corrected this because I do view day 1 no lynches as usually a bad idea and the two times I was town when it mattered I had good lynch candidates and didn't want to give shy-voters a reason to back out.


You benefit from this because it gives the town one less chance to catch you, less evidence by which to find you and your colleagues, and it gives the third faction you believe exists less clues to find and night kill you.

The voting record used to be very handy, regrettably its not very common of late for the day 1 record to indicate DF-dom, last game on day 1 a townie was lynched and only one of the four DFs voted for him, vote records can be useful, but to be blunt, a dead townie he is not acting anti-town is not worth a single vote-record. Also, again, as I've said, it is when you think there is a high probability of two factions that it stops being a great idea, because scummers can easily vote for each other and NK each other. We don't learn too much in that situation.


And as I've said, if we want the two factions to night kill each other, best give them as much evidence to fight their targets as we can. If they have no evidence, they're going to have to night kill pretty much at random, and you know as well as I that means they have a better chance of hitting a townie than a rival scum. Every lynch record has contained at least one scum, and it's not like it goes away, it just cumulates with later vote records.

There are ways to get a vote record without killing someone, you know that, a dead townie by themself is not wort the record in a case like this, and you are ignoring much of what I said, because you want a chance to lynch me, or you'd note that my exceptions are exactly what you just said, voting for people who smell of scum or anti-town. I never, ever said we should no lynch when we have reasonable candidates. But what do you suggest? Hey let's lynch Napoleon because he voted for me, or me because I OMGUS'd him and pointed out that I believe there are rare occasions where a day 1 no lynch can potentially make sense? Maybe we can whack Talic because because beet thinks one of his five settings indicates piracy? No, I have also not suggested we no lynch today, I said that if we have two NK factions it is a potential possibility. Your evidence on me right now is at best, 'holds an incorrect view', yet I maintain it, there are situations in which it may be an acceptable, even preferable course. I win a lot because I never discard any idea or tactic out of hand, I examine it in detail and figure out if it can be used in spite of it's weaknesses. Besides which, as I indicated in the header, regardless of whether or not it is always bad, or maybe sometimes useful, we have a lot of new players, and they need to know why, not just 'because we say so'. Situations change, in recent games the DFs have adapted, they know the vote record can condemn them, and so they adapt, we need to too. And that means examining our options.


It is simplicity itself:

What is the town's victory condition? In my noteboard, I am told that I win when all threats to the tourists are eliminated. In other words, kill all the scum.
How does the town kill scum? By lynching them (mostly).
Tactics that prevent us lynching scum prevent the victory of the town.

A no-lynch will give us, all other actions being equal, one net loss in the number of chances we get to lynch the Darkfriends, therefore it is, as a rule, anti-town. Exceptions are just that, exceptional. You have not provided good reasons why it would be exceptional in this circumstance, so I fail to see how it can be exceptional.

This is completely wrong? You said above you don't support random lynches, if you remove people who don't smell of scum or anti-town, all you have is random. And I do treat players as innocent until at least indicated guilty, most of them are. I don't mind purging anti-town players, but by this logic, again, the vig kills on night 1. Yes, normally it is in our best interest to lynch, and I firmly believe in lynching if we have scummer or anti-town or anti-game behavior, in the absence of that - very rare - then the no lynch is plausible as an option. You keep ignoring every qualifier I put on it and acting as though my saying it's up for discussion means I said 'yes, we must vote to no lynch right now!', and it's either because you just want me lynched, regardless of your or my alignment, or your scum and you don't think you can get a NK on me.


I don't believe in random lynching, as in I don't believe it exists, unless it is structured and the collective will of the town is made on a single throw of luck, and that would obviously be stupid. But individuals 'voting randomly' are seldom doing so randomly, and really, they shouldn't. That's why I don't believe in random townie. Now, the difference between what you say and what I do is that I treat everyone as guilty until indicated innocent. That is why lynching even someone who hasn't done anything to stand out is still valid. Of course, it is always best to vote for the scummiest of the lot, that is self-evident.

Saying it doesn't make it true, you can't run reasonable stats to predict with when you don't know the elements involved, and we don't. If we have good reason to think we're in a classic, all vanilla and chocolate with a single cop, then yes, it is almost invariably in our best interests to lynch. Given individual scenarios, I can show you how random lynch on day 1 can in cases hurt the town, you are also ignoring that I've pointed out that these kind of thin day 1 lynches posed zero threat to the DFs in the past. There's not a single new player in this game, that means there's not a single player who doesn't know the vote record can screw them if they pile on a townie lynch. It may still help us, every little bit of info can, but we can't just whack of people's heads for no reason at all, heck, that is anti-game, because the game is about deduction, about evidence and defense, what defense will someone mount if they realize that they're the one who did something that could barely be interpreted as anti-town or scummy? They're dead, they know it, because unless they can show someone else is more guilty-looking you'll lop their head off no matter how good their defense is. Just leaving it as an option gives scummers a reason to defend their own because they think there is a decent chance they might preserve them, otherwise, it's bus-city. There are always advantages to almost every tactic, the vast majority of the time a lynch is in our best interest and we do find a good reason to target someone, but we don't need to throw the idea out out of hand. You've just said even discussing it is grounds for a lynch, or is just because I said it?

Yes, promoting it is grounds for a lynch in my eyes, and it's not because it's you. Ask Fox and Ravens if you think I'm persecuting you.

You're wrong in saying it poses zero threat to Darkfriends, I often do use Day 1 lynch records for identifying scum - last game, for example, I investigated Fox and Ravens of Night 1 in no small part due to his involvement in the townie lynch, and he was a Darkfriend. Or how about that space game where Gher and I were a cult? On the last Day I played, I pointed out that there were undoubtedly Darkfriends in the list of repeat lynchers - You, Gher, Darth_Katie, someone else (Fox and Ravens?) and myself, and of course, two of those were Cult, two were Mafia, and only one was townie. That's 80% scum right there. Of course, at the time you were arguing not to look at the voting record which is part of what made me suspicious of you in the first place.

Of course, Day 1 lynches will always be flimsier than those on subsequent days, the general lack of data forces that.

Gain: single scummer faction gets no lynch of a townie on day 1, cop cops one of them, docs blocks their kill.

Gain: Two NK factions, no lynch, one of them, or both, target the other

Gain: Cop clears someone as prob or def town, or finds a guilty, a townie dies, but not two.


Bullshit. Absolute bullshit. If we compare two options, we need to compare them with all exterior variable being equal. Not lynching will not miraculously make the night actions go our way, that's just outright lying, and I'd vote for you again if I could. If we compare the repercussions of lynching to not lynching, we must assume the same night actions in both cases, the only exception being if we actually lynch that role. All my consequences are facts that will happen. Because if we were to include random things that might go our way, I'd not only include everything you noted above, but also lynching a Darkfriend.

It all depends on the circumstance, usually it's not a good idea, a wasted chance, but sometimes it makes more sense to hold your shot for a better chance. In a single NK game every townie represents half a day of play, or half a chance for a lynch, it makes sense to lynch when you have some decent evidence of anti-town or scummy behavior, if not, no, keep pressing, most of the time - which is why I said our flexible deadlines eliminate much of the need - you can keep pressing all the way to the end, so a no lynch waste valuable game day, but this need not always be the case, often as a scummer you can press into that void of slump and exhaustion and drag a lynch off on slim reasoning, people will vote for almost anything just to get the day over, sometimes long days result in more info coming out than you want to, roles get exposed or others claim to avoid being a random target.
A drop of vanilla a day keeps the NK away.

Finally, over and over, why? IF I am a DF why have I said all this? Do you deny that if I were a DF it would be in my interest to have a day 1 lynch? No one is likely to die right now to explain this away as a desperate gamble to save them. Don't you think I'd maybe try a normal defense or distraction first? And who am I defending? Myself from Napoleon's random vote? Oh, yes that made me feel endangered, Napoleon from my own OMGUS vote? Oh, I know, Talic from Beetnemesis's vote, because me and Talic are DF buddies and I couldn't think of anyway to shake off the ironclad evidence that one of his five settings proves he's a pirate, and not a budweiser frog or Duffman.


Yes, I deny that if you were a Darkfriend it would be in your interest to have a Day 1 lynch, as I've demonstrated again and again, Day 1 no-lynch is in the absolute interest of the scum. You're not defending anybody, you're encouraging anti-town tactics, Day 1 no-lynch is like a townie lynch with no risk for the scum.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
RAFO Mafia 17, Day 1: Trouble in Paradise - 30/05/2010 10:43:08 PM 3875 Views
Miscellaneous information - 30/05/2010 10:44:49 PM 1185 Views
Epic Intro *NM* - 31/05/2010 02:26:49 AM 740 Views
Thanks *NM* - 31/05/2010 04:00:59 AM 723 Views
Re: Miscellaneous information - 31/05/2010 04:38:35 AM 1218 Views
What. - 31/05/2010 02:30:11 AM 1250 Views
Re: What. - 31/05/2010 03:01:21 AM 1278 Views
Or maybe he just wants us to think that ... - 31/05/2010 04:08:54 AM 1216 Views
RAFO *NM* - 31/05/2010 04:01:26 AM 729 Views
Re: RAFO Mafia 17, Day 1: Trouble in Paradise - 31/05/2010 03:08:30 AM 1240 Views
I'm afraid I'm already waaay in over my head - 31/05/2010 07:20:54 AM 1167 Views
You don't need to get all the references to play though - 31/05/2010 07:31:32 AM 1135 Views
Don't forget the 5th element *NM* - 31/05/2010 08:25:13 AM 778 Views
and the adam's family *NM* - 31/05/2010 03:26:23 PM 780 Views
African Rabies is World War Z. Also- DEATH UNICORN!!!! - 31/05/2010 06:06:47 PM 1227 Views
Okay, so, let's get this started. - 31/05/2010 07:48:13 AM 1257 Views
yes and yes *NM* - 31/05/2010 12:24:19 PM 744 Views
Yes and Yes. Do you? *NM* - 31/05/2010 01:03:04 PM 747 Views
Yes I do. *NM* - 31/05/2010 07:42:15 PM 776 Views
Indeedy. *NM* - 31/05/2010 02:48:49 PM 693 Views
Yessir *NM* - 31/05/2010 02:59:06 PM 730 Views
Yup *NM* - 31/05/2010 06:07:41 PM 646 Views
Well that depends. - 31/05/2010 06:53:02 PM 1102 Views
Wow, of all the people here to be unfamiliar with a character. - 31/05/2010 07:43:54 PM 1187 Views
Yeah, that's weird - 31/05/2010 08:02:09 PM 1145 Views
I went with Wikipedia, actually . - 31/05/2010 08:11:31 PM 1229 Views
I do...(for both) - 31/05/2010 07:09:06 PM 1370 Views
I would be willing to bet that's true. - 31/05/2010 08:50:05 PM 1194 Views
So are you saying the Tourists are also all... tourists? - 31/05/2010 08:54:31 PM 1131 Views
EBWOP - 31/05/2010 08:57:51 PM 1158 Views
I think the "Zombie" comes from the African Rabies reference - 31/05/2010 09:42:31 PM 1206 Views
That's a good point. - 31/05/2010 10:09:29 PM 1144 Views
Maybe whoever dies becomes a zombie - 02/06/2010 01:57:59 AM 1191 Views
What's in a name? - 01/06/2010 03:09:24 AM 1120 Views
Clever - 01/06/2010 03:37:55 AM 1042 Views
No idea. *NM* - 31/05/2010 10:28:53 PM 703 Views
Does that mean you're just not sure of who you are - 01/06/2010 12:51:17 AM 1074 Views
*looks shamefully down* - 01/06/2010 07:22:16 AM 1232 Views
Yeargh! *NM* - 31/05/2010 11:59:28 PM 721 Views
Yes to both. *NM* - 01/06/2010 12:54:55 AM 757 Views
Wait, scratch that. I don't have a place of origin. *NM* - 01/06/2010 03:06:49 AM 619 Views
I didn't think he meant place but rather the work that you're from *NM* - 01/06/2010 03:20:59 AM 684 Views
Oh. Then yeah. *NM* - 01/06/2010 03:48:21 AM 868 Views
Yeah...i got both. *NM* - 01/06/2010 02:57:56 AM 708 Views
yeps. *NM* - 02/06/2010 01:35:56 AM 665 Views
Oh, and I nearly forgot ... - 31/05/2010 02:50:14 PM 1148 Views
WOOOOOOOO *NM* - 31/05/2010 06:07:54 PM 752 Views
If there is an Oompa Loompa song whenever someone dies, I will die happy *NM* - 31/05/2010 06:09:38 PM 673 Views
+1 - 31/05/2010 08:35:28 PM 1214 Views
+1 to that song. *NM* - 31/05/2010 08:46:39 PM 711 Views
thank you, i'm here all week *NM* - 31/05/2010 09:48:53 PM 686 Views
Re: thank you, i'm here all week *NM* - 31/05/2010 09:49:52 PM 698 Views
people would die of hilarity. *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:03:07 AM 759 Views
Since I tried to start a conversation, but failed (because I posted in the wrong place?) - 01/06/2010 07:25:29 AM 1058 Views
ummm, dear? - 01/06/2010 10:49:54 AM 1080 Views
Actually, there is. *NM* - 01/06/2010 11:27:46 AM 705 Views
fudgemuffins *NM* - 01/06/2010 04:02:28 PM 642 Views
Are the election rules the same? And the 96 hour deadline? - 02/06/2010 01:08:06 AM 1062 Views
It's announced in the Miscellaneous information - 01/06/2010 03:17:06 PM 1086 Views
^^^Attention-seeker = Jester^^^ - 01/06/2010 11:07:44 PM 1059 Views
Re: ^^^Attention-seeker = Jester^^^ - 02/06/2010 01:12:59 AM 1123 Views
At least I got the discussion going. *NM* - 02/06/2010 05:58:58 PM 691 Views
You know what? - 02/06/2010 06:11:16 PM 1185 Views
Two can play at that game! - 03/06/2010 01:58:09 AM 1079 Views
Some first thoughts - 01/06/2010 10:27:38 PM 1057 Views
Current Info (Table) - 01/06/2010 10:40:41 PM 1315 Views
Re: Current Info (Table) - 01/06/2010 10:42:17 PM 1144 Views
UNC UNC *NM* - 01/06/2010 11:35:11 PM 726 Views
Yes & UNC - 02/06/2010 02:14:48 AM 1207 Views
No and yes. - 02/06/2010 02:23:49 AM 1146 Views
OMGUS Vote: Napoleon62 *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:40:52 AM 720 Views
Random stone throwing super dick vote - 02/06/2010 08:00:57 PM 1149 Views
ranagrande has been lynched - 02/06/2010 09:30:53 PM 1158 Views
ROFL - 02/06/2010 09:47:48 PM 1199 Views
Hahaha - 03/06/2010 02:08:29 AM 1149 Views
UNC and NO - 02/06/2010 06:05:25 PM 1180 Views
Re: UNC and NO - 02/06/2010 06:17:14 PM 1124 Views
UNC and NO *NM* - 03/06/2010 01:56:35 AM 683 Views
a) Kinda - Yes/UNC. B) UNC. - 01/06/2010 10:54:32 PM 1179 Views
Re: Some first thoughts - 01/06/2010 11:03:00 PM 1216 Views
UNC/UNC *NM* - 01/06/2010 11:42:21 PM 769 Views
Yes and unable to judge - UNC *NM* - 02/06/2010 12:22:33 AM 695 Views
Just do your best on answers, the questions are deliberately vague - 02/06/2010 12:43:25 AM 1025 Views
So... many... acronyms... - 02/06/2010 01:51:46 AM 1091 Views
Nipz makes me think of Cheese Nips. - 03/06/2010 01:55:20 AM 1158 Views
Yes and yes. *NM* - 02/06/2010 01:55:07 AM 705 Views
Yes/Yes *NM* - 02/06/2010 03:46:49 PM 719 Views
UNC and UNC *NM* - 03/06/2010 04:36:55 PM 643 Views
OK, so we all know who we are. Now what? - 02/06/2010 05:12:38 PM 1183 Views
We seem to have two random votes already - 02/06/2010 06:06:29 PM 1032 Views
You mean Napoleon and Isaac? - 03/06/2010 03:07:14 AM 1210 Views
Still, it's a start - 03/06/2010 06:40:16 PM 1073 Views
What do y'all think? - 03/06/2010 12:36:23 AM 1092 Views
Re: What do y'all think? - 03/06/2010 01:01:52 AM 1139 Views
I won't be participating in that. - 03/06/2010 01:06:26 AM 1011 Views
That's pretty legit. - 03/06/2010 02:05:50 AM 1163 Views
We could talk about Napoleon62 and Isaac voting each other for no reason *NM* - 03/06/2010 02:43:03 AM 686 Views
You think there are ulterior motives? - 03/06/2010 03:07:28 AM 1110 Views
*confused* Aren't there always? *NM* - 03/06/2010 03:09:49 AM 741 Views
Not really in this case - 03/06/2010 04:46:02 AM 1078 Views
It was a joke - 03/06/2010 03:11:00 AM 1097 Views
Re: It was a joke - 03/06/2010 03:14:48 AM 1039 Views
Fair enough. Good reason not to. - 03/06/2010 03:45:35 AM 1120 Views
I actually think it's a decent idea, just needs a modification - 03/06/2010 04:33:47 AM 1106 Views
I remember that. - 03/06/2010 06:10:33 AM 1013 Views
Okay, so next 'question' - 03/06/2010 07:57:08 AM 1144 Views
Ranagrande really seemed to make an effort to go out of his way here. - 03/06/2010 01:31:03 PM 1089 Views
But if you're from something really weird - 03/06/2010 05:54:37 PM 1174 Views
You don't even need to pick a bunch of weird things - 03/06/2010 08:23:19 PM 1211 Views
Is one of those two sets of 5 your answer to your 5 worlds question? - 06/06/2010 10:03:52 PM 1198 Views
No, they were examples - 07/06/2010 12:14:03 AM 981 Views
Yeah, I'm still not doing it. - 03/06/2010 06:59:26 PM 1176 Views
yeesh! - 03/06/2010 09:36:33 AM 1102 Views
Re: yeesh! - 03/06/2010 10:41:58 AM 1071 Views
Alright, I'll do it you fraidy catz - 03/06/2010 09:23:58 PM 1123 Views
Re: What do y'all think? - 03/06/2010 04:28:44 AM 1098 Views
IMPORTANT POINT - 04/06/2010 05:04:18 AM 1090 Views
That's a good point - 04/06/2010 05:28:39 AM 1147 Views
Who, exactly, is this warning intended for? - 04/06/2010 05:30:05 AM 1169 Views
Re: Who, exactly, is this warning intended for? - 04/06/2010 05:37:25 AM 1143 Views
Re: Who, exactly, is this warning intended for? - 04/06/2010 05:49:00 AM 1133 Views
It is an interesting theory, though - 04/06/2010 07:37:30 AM 1075 Views
Re: It is an interesting theory, though - 04/06/2010 08:41:16 AM 1135 Views
Oh, BTW Isaac: you didn't update for my answer in your Table - 04/06/2010 09:01:00 AM 1110 Views
Wow, that's a weird one - 04/06/2010 09:44:23 AM 1013 Views
Re: It is an interesting theory, though - 04/06/2010 03:41:43 PM 1165 Views
I was assuming she meant it the same way we warn hypocoppers - 04/06/2010 03:51:06 PM 1060 Views
jargon question. - 04/06/2010 06:19:51 PM 1105 Views
Re: jargon question. - 04/06/2010 06:37:34 PM 1075 Views
okies thanks *NM* - 05/06/2010 03:56:31 AM 675 Views
Sorry I screwed up your fancy plans. - 04/06/2010 08:05:18 PM 1138 Views
I must be really tired. - 05/06/2010 02:52:32 AM 1039 Views
Honestly, anyone trying to lynch based solely on series - 05/06/2010 04:00:13 AM 1018 Views
or to kill? - 05/06/2010 04:05:53 AM 1130 Views
Re: or to kill? - 05/06/2010 08:18:25 AM 1105 Views
EBWOP: programmed, not programmer *NM* - 05/06/2010 08:21:00 AM 709 Views
Ohhhh ok, so you assumed he was roled, not that he wa a Doc - 05/06/2010 07:37:36 PM 1133 Views
Out of curiosity, what did he say? - 05/06/2010 06:47:43 AM 1205 Views
He said he was programmed. - 05/06/2010 08:22:45 AM 1148 Views
But... wasn't that the robot game, where we were all programmed? - 05/06/2010 07:37:03 PM 1172 Views
Actually, my own RM didn't mention robots at all, so odds are neither did DK's - 05/06/2010 09:00:52 PM 1203 Views
Yup, it was the same. *NM* - 05/06/2010 10:11:22 PM 655 Views
Can we agree on revealing gender? *NM* - 04/06/2010 06:20:29 PM 672 Views
Will that really help us tell who is mafia and who is not? - 04/06/2010 06:39:07 PM 1123 Views
It'll get us info. - 04/06/2010 08:27:20 PM 1206 Views
Will listing off five random worlds? - 05/06/2010 04:09:55 AM 1017 Views
Re: Will listing off five random worlds? - 05/06/2010 08:25:38 AM 1184 Views
Re: Will listing off five random worlds? - 06/06/2010 10:11:18 PM 1059 Views
Re: Will listing off five random worlds? - 07/06/2010 10:31:21 AM 1160 Views
Re: Will listing off five random worlds? - 07/06/2010 12:23:35 PM 1032 Views
I think we should do this. - 05/06/2010 01:21:18 AM 1098 Views
im definalty a man *NM* - 06/06/2010 09:07:47 PM 652 Views
btw, what happened to the Chair election? - 04/06/2010 10:46:41 PM 1063 Views
Artsapat has been elected Chair. - 05/06/2010 12:39:05 AM 1113 Views
OK, since I'm apparently Chair (including a Table) *updated Jun 9th* - 06/06/2010 07:43:10 PM 1163 Views
BlackAdder - M *NM* - 06/06/2010 10:00:38 PM 654 Views
Isaac - M (a note on gender) - 06/06/2010 11:01:55 PM 1081 Views
I'm a dude. *NM* - 07/06/2010 12:04:11 AM 731 Views
Male *NM* - 07/06/2010 12:42:34 AM 654 Views
I am female - 07/06/2010 03:11:45 AM 1109 Views
Male. *NM* - 07/06/2010 04:52:39 AM 654 Views
I must have been REALLY tired not having seen this yesterday - 07/06/2010 08:00:23 AM 1112 Views
Male. . . .again. *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:37:52 AM 677 Views
Napoleon's going to have a hard time - 07/06/2010 09:10:21 AM 1098 Views
Let's not. *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:06:58 PM 669 Views
I'll call you Smurfette anyway. You know, just because I can. *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:29:35 PM 634 Views
Don't worry, Bro. We can have girl talk together *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:44:32 PM 739 Views
Male *NM* - 07/06/2010 10:26:37 AM 676 Views
Female. *NM* - 07/06/2010 01:21:11 PM 639 Views
I'm all MAN!!!!! - 07/06/2010 02:04:55 PM 1147 Views
I am a manly man! *NM* - 07/06/2010 11:57:48 PM 600 Views
Male *NM* - 08/06/2010 03:22:47 AM 685 Views
Male *NM* - 09/06/2010 12:19:46 AM 656 Views
Settings (Table) - 07/06/2010 12:47:35 AM 1088 Views
Uh - 07/06/2010 02:13:40 AM 1182 Views
Re: Uh - 07/06/2010 03:20:53 AM 1149 Views
Yeah, I don't get it either. - 07/06/2010 04:56:42 AM 1048 Views
Can someone explain for the slow kids? - 08/06/2010 06:59:47 AM 1066 Views
Short answer: click the little links at the right side of the page - 08/06/2010 10:56:37 PM 1232 Views
Basically - 08/06/2010 11:16:26 PM 1206 Views
Hmm... - 07/06/2010 10:49:12 AM 1124 Views
Mine - 07/06/2010 01:54:06 PM 1137 Views
Soooo yeah..... - 07/06/2010 02:03:19 PM 1151 Views
Hm. Alright. - 07/06/2010 07:15:16 PM 1173 Views
Re: Settings (Table) - 07/06/2010 08:56:30 PM 1118 Views
Re: Settings (Table) - 07/06/2010 11:42:27 PM 1100 Views
Anyone else get the feeling we have some "nontraditional" settings? - 08/06/2010 12:04:23 AM 1143 Views
Didn't I suggest that from the beginning? *NM* - 08/06/2010 03:08:36 AM 663 Views
Re: Settings (Table) - 08/06/2010 03:42:52 AM 1120 Views
The responses of me - 09/06/2010 02:03:08 AM 1153 Views
Mine. - 09/06/2010 08:07:17 PM 1163 Views
Two new thoughts - 08/06/2010 07:48:24 AM 1158 Views
Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 12:02:01 AM 1172 Views
Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 04:31:06 AM 1117 Views
Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 05:03:10 AM 1057 Views
Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 12:11:51 PM 1126 Views
Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 04:57:02 AM 1185 Views
In which I spoil everyone's identity! (Well, maybe not) - 09/06/2010 07:34:08 AM 995 Views
Whoops, replied to the wrong spot... ignore this one, look below! *NM* - 09/06/2010 07:35:40 AM 666 Views
Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 12:00:28 PM 1139 Views
Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 03:26:16 AM 1204 Views
Oops. - 09/06/2010 12:28:25 AM 1356 Views
Whoa, how are we dead already? - 09/06/2010 03:28:53 AM 1082 Views
There are still like 5 people left who haven't claimed settings - 09/06/2010 04:19:38 AM 1077 Views
In which I spoil everyone's identity! (Well, maybe not) - 09/06/2010 07:35:10 AM 1138 Views
Not sure about the Talic vote, but - 09/06/2010 10:35:25 AM 1127 Views
Agree - 09/06/2010 12:24:47 PM 1129 Views
Yeah, I'll be participating even less than before. - 09/06/2010 06:10:34 PM 1169 Views
Re: Yeah, I'll be participating even less than before. - 09/06/2010 06:26:08 PM 1124 Views
Re: Yeah, I'll be participating even less than before. - 09/06/2010 08:53:53 PM 1152 Views
Eh. Let's just lynch Talic. - 09/06/2010 11:23:16 PM 1163 Views
Maybe you should explain why you think a 'No Lynch' on Day 1 is always bad - 10/06/2010 02:05:16 AM 1128 Views
Do we have any reason to believe that the scum are not a single united faction? *NM* - 10/06/2010 02:23:11 AM 753 Views
I'd say so, it's indicated in the intro text and it's been normal of late - 10/06/2010 02:35:26 AM 1063 Views
Incidentally... - 10/06/2010 04:24:23 AM 1063 Views
Agreed. - 10/06/2010 04:31:26 AM 1081 Views
But even if that happens - 10/06/2010 07:37:45 AM 1125 Views
Because it is always bad. Seems like the ideal reason. - 10/06/2010 04:21:10 AM 1080 Views
Thank you. - 10/06/2010 04:30:23 AM 1138 Views
Good points. - 10/06/2010 04:45:24 AM 1266 Views
Re: Good points. - 10/06/2010 04:53:22 AM 1123 Views
Totally. *NM* - 10/06/2010 04:57:57 AM 695 Views
Re: Because it is always bad. Seems like the ideal reason. - 10/06/2010 05:03:15 AM 1138 Views
We might randomly lynch (or try to lynch) someone who is part of a faction - 10/06/2010 06:37:48 AM 1113 Views
Yeah, but that isn't a voting record. - 11/06/2010 04:41:29 AM 1166 Views
I don't believe in completely random lynches. - 10/06/2010 04:35:42 PM 1175 Views
I feel like random lynches are a really good place for scum to hide. - 10/06/2010 06:19:22 PM 1154 Views
'Seems' isn't 'Is', a dead townie is a dead townie - 10/06/2010 05:57:19 AM 1099 Views
Which is pretty much the point. - 10/06/2010 05:39:36 PM 1127 Views
Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 10/06/2010 06:31:40 PM 1189 Views
Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 11/06/2010 01:56:41 AM 1185 Views
Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 11/06/2010 02:18:56 AM 1083 Views
Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 11/06/2010 02:35:14 AM 1248 Views
Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 11/06/2010 12:58:25 AM 1176 Views
Incidentally, how likely do you think it is that I am a Darkfriend? - 11/06/2010 01:34:55 AM 1171 Views
Probably less than random with some caveats, over all, roughly random - 11/06/2010 02:21:24 AM 1166 Views
Re: Probably less than random with some caveats, over all, roughly random - 11/06/2010 02:40:33 AM 1219 Views
I suppose we're back to DefCon 5 - 11/06/2010 03:36:12 AM 1186 Views
Re: I suppose we're back to DefCon 5 - 11/06/2010 03:48:31 AM 1122 Views
Re: I suppose we're back to DefCon 5 - 11/06/2010 04:08:27 AM 1020 Views
Well actually technically I am kinda new. *NM* - 12/06/2010 01:22:50 PM 675 Views
Whoa, did I put Dark Shadows? - 09/06/2010 06:22:16 PM 1154 Views
Yeaaah, I don't think so. - 09/06/2010 08:13:41 PM 1047 Views
Update! Darth Katie's analysis: - 09/06/2010 11:20:36 PM 1160 Views
So sorry guys - 10/06/2010 06:31:49 AM 1173 Views
It happens, don't worry about it - 10/06/2010 06:35:25 AM 1201 Views
No problem - 10/06/2010 04:17:27 PM 1213 Views
Any chance we can get Gher to replace in? - 10/06/2010 07:30:04 PM 1330 Views
That would be great if he wanted to - 10/06/2010 08:46:55 PM 1159 Views
Actually... - 10/06/2010 08:52:19 PM 1122 Views
An addition to my Talic accusation - 10/06/2010 08:48:14 AM 1166 Views
Duffman wouldn't be awesome? - 10/06/2010 10:31:30 AM 1135 Views
It was mostly a "slightly better than random" vote - 10/06/2010 04:42:38 PM 1067 Views
Well, it did raise a good point for approach though - 11/06/2010 01:05:18 AM 1131 Views
Oh come on. - 10/06/2010 05:56:54 PM 1174 Views
I maintain it made sense - 11/06/2010 02:55:39 AM 1114 Views
Heading rival Darkfriend factions would've been awesome. - 11/06/2010 03:02:35 AM 1090 Views
Definitely - 11/06/2010 03:20:38 AM 1148 Views
Re: Oh come on. - 12/06/2010 01:56:41 PM 1065 Views
oh why so serious beet? - 10/06/2010 09:11:03 PM 1090 Views
...just watch? - 10/06/2010 11:15:20 PM 1263 Views
Combined Info (Table) - 11/06/2010 04:33:01 AM 1205 Views
The All-Seeing Eye of Sauron is upon you... let the brutal analysis begin - 11/06/2010 05:16:27 AM 1122 Views
Hmm ... I think I am working from a different definition of Modern Real Earth. - 11/06/2010 06:37:04 AM 1121 Views
Re: Hmm ... I think I am working from a different definition of Modern Real Earth. - 11/06/2010 12:50:16 PM 1176 Views
Works for me. *NM* - 11/06/2010 02:19:45 PM 636 Views
Re: The All-Seeing Eye of Sauron is upon you... let the brutal analysis begin - 12/06/2010 03:33:37 PM 1197 Views
You have an acronym fetish, don't you? *NM* - 11/06/2010 09:02:07 AM 743 Views
You know, just because someone is good or bad in their series, - 11/06/2010 05:35:04 AM 1142 Views
Yep, but the individual character will control that I think - 11/06/2010 05:42:28 AM 1176 Views
RBIRL for the weekend *NM* - 11/06/2010 12:51:17 PM 634 Views
Me too basically. *NM* - 11/06/2010 02:24:38 PM 654 Views
[realy busy in real life] - 12/06/2010 12:41:46 PM 1105 Views
RBIRL for another effing week. - 13/06/2010 01:55:52 AM 1154 Views
I'm RBIRL this week as well, through Friday. *NM* - 13/06/2010 06:40:04 AM 672 Views
I am forced to assume - 13/06/2010 02:46:47 PM 1118 Views
Oh, and I am semi-RBIRL until Friday too. *NM* - 13/06/2010 03:00:47 PM 677 Views
Re: I am forced to assume - 15/06/2010 06:44:06 AM 1169 Views
Well good luck with that too, I guess. - 15/06/2010 10:29:19 PM 1067 Views
I'm not busy at all! Let's murder someone! - 13/06/2010 04:06:04 AM 1058 Views
Re: I'm not busy at all! Let's murder someone! - 13/06/2010 02:16:40 PM 1112 Views
Why Isaac? *NM* - 13/06/2010 02:47:49 PM 666 Views
I too, unsurprisingly, would like an answer to that *NM* - 13/06/2010 05:48:29 PM 667 Views
Good point. - 13/06/2010 06:20:55 PM 1103 Views
Eh, do we ever get that much out of Day One? - 13/06/2010 06:46:31 PM 1262 Views
Kinda. - 13/06/2010 09:16:56 PM 1171 Views
Actually it's often the most productive day - 13/06/2010 09:26:25 PM 1064 Views
Before I basically disappear from this thread for about a week... - 13/06/2010 08:55:03 PM 1165 Views
Okay, pushing forward - 14/06/2010 04:29:20 PM 1366 Views
Re: Okay, pushing forward - 14/06/2010 06:50:19 PM 1104 Views
Re: Okay, pushing forward - 14/06/2010 10:27:43 PM 1104 Views
EBWOP - 15/06/2010 12:59:20 AM 1406 Views
Yes it's just day 1 - 15/06/2010 01:06:56 AM 1136 Views
Pledge: No; CON: Sure - 15/06/2010 12:31:57 AM 1158 Views
So... - 15/06/2010 01:04:11 AM 1107 Views
If you will allow me to be pedantic. - 15/06/2010 01:24:07 AM 1020 Views
Duly noted - 15/06/2010 01:38:34 AM 1099 Views
Not like they were especially contributive anyway. - 15/06/2010 02:26:34 AM 1026 Views
Re: So... - 15/06/2010 02:29:41 AM 1116 Views
Re: So... - 15/06/2010 07:52:29 AM 1071 Views
Re: So... - 16/06/2010 06:36:22 PM 1236 Views
I think scum might be willing to ask some questions. - 15/06/2010 01:43:57 AM 1081 Views
Yes, they do - 15/06/2010 02:32:57 AM 1084 Views
The pledge I am not very enthused about. - 15/06/2010 01:42:27 AM 1140 Views
Okay, now you're just pushing for a No-Lynch in different terms. - 15/06/2010 04:49:26 AM 1116 Views
Also... - 15/06/2010 03:12:18 PM 1175 Views
Well, the role itself is something you would not expect. - 15/06/2010 03:36:33 PM 1208 Views
That's an ambiguous but tantalizing statement... - 15/06/2010 03:59:29 PM 1234 Views
my role and char are consistant - 15/06/2010 10:04:51 AM 1123 Views
Re: my role and char are consistant - 15/06/2010 03:23:10 PM 1181 Views
Do you have a suggestion? *NM* - 15/06/2010 06:10:25 PM 640 Views
On that note... - 16/06/2010 07:02:12 PM 1222 Views
Seeing hwo you're trying to protect me from getting Lynched - 15/06/2010 12:40:27 PM 1069 Views
Re: Seeing hwo you're trying to protect me from getting Lynched - 15/06/2010 04:21:56 PM 1134 Views
Every vanilla is supposed to say yes. - 15/06/2010 06:13:08 PM 1145 Views
Which of course brings about the real problem, which is the opposite of what you say. - 15/06/2010 06:26:42 PM 1093 Views
Let me hold off on answering this, if you don't mind - 15/06/2010 07:14:25 PM 1116 Views
Fine, I'm not in a hurry. *NM* - 15/06/2010 07:17:10 PM 755 Views
Let me run another possible question by you - 15/06/2010 08:18:33 PM 1148 Views
By the way, this is sort of a revision of white flame's question - 15/06/2010 08:21:32 PM 998 Views
At first glance, I don't see any problem with it. - 15/06/2010 09:31:44 PM 1137 Views
Let's go with it then - 15/06/2010 09:42:32 PM 1168 Views
Sure. - 15/06/2010 11:28:10 PM 1075 Views
Re: Sure. - 15/06/2010 11:45:37 PM 1036 Views
Ok so I really don't like the idea of the pledge - 15/06/2010 04:27:09 PM 1126 Views
DFs might try to skate through. - 15/06/2010 10:57:06 PM 1227 Views
Actually Gender was mine... *NM* - 16/06/2010 06:31:02 PM 625 Views
Also, yes to con, no to pledge. *NM* - 16/06/2010 07:03:42 PM 684 Views
The Big Info Compilation v 1.0 (Table) - 14/06/2010 07:40:38 PM 1263 Views
to get the game moving - 15/06/2010 08:53:38 PM 1182 Views
go on... *NM* - 15/06/2010 09:38:13 PM 708 Views
its day one, do i realy need a reason? *NM* - 15/06/2010 09:56:59 PM 699 Views
It is customary *NM* - 15/06/2010 10:01:25 PM 701 Views
well... - 15/06/2010 11:04:29 PM 1087 Views
Eh, I think I've been pretty consistent - 16/06/2010 06:35:57 AM 1064 Views
Yeah, I was a bit wary of the way he leapt on Talic too. - 16/06/2010 12:51:30 PM 1179 Views
I actually would think it proves his innocence over anything - 17/06/2010 12:18:04 AM 1198 Views
Next Question - 15/06/2010 09:56:10 PM 1082 Views
Seriously - 15/06/2010 10:58:24 PM 1146 Views
I am willing to answer if others are willing though *NM* - 15/06/2010 10:58:44 PM 673 Views
It's interesting, actually. - 16/06/2010 06:37:41 AM 1196 Views
Debatable. - 15/06/2010 11:00:39 PM 1147 Views
Strong Yes - 16/06/2010 06:38:53 AM 1156 Views
Didn't you already say you were a manly man? - 16/06/2010 12:52:57 PM 1151 Views
Well, he could also be a 'neither' or 'both'. *NM* - 16/06/2010 05:24:26 PM 713 Views
I am large; I contain multitudes - 16/06/2010 07:48:33 PM 1135 Views
HGD- No *NM* - 16/06/2010 12:11:28 PM 610 Views
I find the HDG question vague and polarizing... *NM* - 16/06/2010 07:04:59 PM 700 Views
HDG- yes - 17/06/2010 11:23:18 PM 1114 Views
Who isn't answering questions (Table) - 17/06/2010 03:13:58 PM 1064 Views
oi! - 17/06/2010 07:43:23 PM 1161 Views
Gotcha, fixed it - 17/06/2010 07:50:53 PM 1028 Views
Throw in an oi for me, too - 17/06/2010 11:22:48 PM 1129 Views
One of my answers - 18/06/2010 12:50:15 PM 1078 Views
It won't be too much longer - 18/06/2010 05:25:36 PM 1035 Views
Agreed - 18/06/2010 06:39:35 PM 1111 Views
"It" being my own notes etc, off course *NM* - 18/06/2010 06:42:42 PM 661 Views
Re: Agreed - 18/06/2010 08:02:02 PM 1305 Views
Fox is RBIRL until after this weekend - 18/06/2010 10:06:26 PM 1330 Views
HDG: Plead the 5th - 19/06/2010 09:49:08 AM 1195 Views
No longer RBIRL and will be what I mostly skimmed over in a bit - 19/06/2010 10:00:12 AM 1055 Views
Technical difficulties... back to RBIRL until fixed *NM* - 20/06/2010 12:28:41 AM 667 Views
All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 19/06/2010 08:36:14 PM 1076 Views
why just FOS? - 19/06/2010 09:48:25 PM 1084 Views
EBWOP Vote Artsapat - 19/06/2010 09:51:01 PM 1092 Views
I can't vote for two people at once - 19/06/2010 10:12:10 PM 1036 Views
Honestly, I'm in standby at this point. - 20/06/2010 09:31:42 AM 1118 Views
Just for you Beet, a non-acronym version - 20/06/2010 05:13:07 PM 1095 Views
Hah, nice, thanks - 20/06/2010 05:24:15 PM 1111 Views
Welcome *NM* - 20/06/2010 05:24:57 PM 651 Views
Interesting. - 20/06/2010 01:41:40 AM 1213 Views
Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 20/06/2010 03:43:46 AM 1185 Views
Okay, admittedly, I haven't been paying that much attention. - 20/06/2010 05:55:51 AM 1091 Views
Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 20/06/2010 01:29:43 PM 1180 Views
Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 20/06/2010 05:47:45 PM 1082 Views
I'll reply to this in bits, but first: - 20/06/2010 06:09:26 PM 1142 Views
Re: I'll reply to this in bits, but first: - 20/06/2010 06:44:33 PM 1074 Views
I just wanted a one word thingy, so people could type it easy - 20/06/2010 08:15:57 PM 1225 Views
No Comment *NM* - 22/06/2010 11:34:42 PM 643 Views
Let me extend you an offer - 20/06/2010 08:24:11 PM 1185 Views
A typo-less message implies I'm distracted? How? - 21/06/2010 04:41:17 AM 1192 Views
No, you said you were distracted, I said the message looks like you want people to think so - 21/06/2010 04:52:36 AM 1169 Views
I thought I did address the accusation. - 21/06/2010 05:06:41 AM 1091 Views
See, and I know you're gonna think that was an intentional typo to prove a point. It wasn't, honest - 21/06/2010 05:09:05 AM 1213 Views
I'm not really interested in typos one way or another - 21/06/2010 05:16:19 AM 1140 Views
I'm a Barbie girl, in a Barbie world. - 21/06/2010 05:27:27 AM 1114 Views
And now I'm gonna sleep. I'll get to your questions in the morning. - 21/06/2010 05:29:08 AM 1068 Views
Aqua aside, why did you answer UNC for MRE and MCS? - 21/06/2010 05:35:31 AM 1043 Views
Re: Aqua aside, why did you answer UNC for MRE and MCS? - 21/06/2010 02:59:05 PM 1133 Views
MRE seems to be giving a lot of people trouble *NM* - 21/06/2010 05:40:57 PM 668 Views
Maybe ask the question again and try to get confirmation? *NM* - 21/06/2010 06:47:51 PM 657 Views
I think UNC is consistent for MRE for Barbie - 21/06/2010 06:51:13 PM 1105 Views
For the record, I did eventually change my consistency to a yes. - 21/06/2010 07:17:09 PM 1086 Views
Possible, and MCS? - 21/06/2010 07:21:29 PM 1091 Views
Yeah, that's also sketchy. - 21/06/2010 07:28:24 PM 1079 Views
Re: Yeah, that's also sketchy. - 21/06/2010 08:03:27 PM 1096 Views
Kronin's Barbie, but claimed he wasn't a major character? Vote: Kronin - 21/06/2010 11:39:34 PM 1130 Views
I'd like a roleclaim. - 22/06/2010 12:48:13 AM 1089 Views
Honestly, looking back, consistency should've been a yes. - 22/06/2010 01:21:16 AM 1152 Views
Oh, and don't forget about Arty. - 22/06/2010 01:21:49 AM 1109 Views
Each day you can be a different role? That's kind of awesome *NM* - 22/06/2010 07:22:35 AM 697 Views
Well, I knew it would come down to this, as soon as you pointed a finger to me. - 21/06/2010 08:02:42 AM 1087 Views
Might as well explain my answers then. - 21/06/2010 08:52:46 AM 1153 Views
Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 20/06/2010 06:37:50 PM 1138 Views
Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 21/06/2010 07:57:59 AM 1216 Views
Wow, so I suppose these questions can be used in a town friendly way - 20/06/2010 02:06:15 PM 1166 Views
Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll - 22/06/2010 01:25:27 AM 1104 Views
Now, I'm all in favor of lynching Isaac. - 22/06/2010 01:37:37 AM 1222 Views
"You lie you die" is sound policy not only Day 1, but every Day. - 22/06/2010 01:40:46 AM 1102 Views
Vote: Artsapat - 22/06/2010 05:01:31 AM 1009 Views
Hey, that's a good idea. Vote: Artsapat *NM* - 22/06/2010 05:18:21 AM 660 Views
Re: Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll - 22/06/2010 01:43:07 AM 1064 Views
I suppose I'll join in - 22/06/2010 01:45:48 AM 1111 Views
I'm not gonna deny that I deserve this. - 22/06/2010 03:24:38 AM 1093 Views
- 22/06/2010 03:52:33 AM 1136 Views
Oh man, that was hilarious. - 22/06/2010 03:54:58 AM 1097 Views
Re: Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll - 22/06/2010 04:15:44 AM 1051 Views
Re: Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll - 22/06/2010 04:31:27 AM 1096 Views
Yea! Kill Kronin! - 22/06/2010 04:56:58 AM 1101 Views
No offense meant, bro. *NM* - 22/06/2010 05:45:22 PM 664 Views
My answers to the 2 questions asked... - 20/06/2010 05:31:22 PM 1028 Views
Just out of curiosity... - 20/06/2010 05:57:00 PM 1072 Views
Re: Just out of curiosity... - 20/06/2010 06:42:38 PM 1090 Views
Vote Table - 21/06/2010 08:51:45 PM 1042 Views
Well, I suppose the sensible thing to do here is lynch Kronin. - 22/06/2010 04:08:46 AM 1057 Views
I told you, main character was my bad. - 22/06/2010 04:20:08 AM 1045 Views
OK, I'll hammer this - 22/06/2010 07:29:38 AM 1028 Views
Kronin al'Sulc has been lynched - 22/06/2010 01:44:22 PM 1121 Views
a slight delay - 25/06/2010 05:55:03 AM 1087 Views
Re: a slight delay - 25/06/2010 07:28:21 AM 1122 Views
No worries, take your time - 25/06/2010 02:02:58 PM 1067 Views

Reply to Message