Just wanted to review notation a little bit, through out the come, on the board or in NBs, you'll see me use stuff like 0+RPs, 1+RPS, 2+RPS... and my own notes currently have a lot of shorthand like 1+RPSW, or RPSE, RPSS, RPSF
That's short hand, I generally try to make sure I don't use it in message to people, but if you see it, or if someone gets tired of typing out the full versions and wants to use it instead, there you go.
RPS - Rock, Paper, Scissors
RPSW - RPS that targets the Will attribute
RPSS - RPS that targets the Skill attribute
RPSE - RPS that targets the Energy attribute
RPSF - RPS that targets the Flesh attribute
RPSX - RPS that targets the attribute of your choice
And #+RPS or #+RPSX just means your score, like 1+RPSW, is 1 plus the RPS result (-1, 0, +1) against your target player's Will.
The default for the game equivalent of a 'normal role' is 1+RPS where one of the four attributes is pre-determined as the target. Their own attributes don't factor in to their 'attack' though there is generally some relation to it, a wizard throwing lightning bolts at you against your Energy skill is not likely to have a 0 in Energy, even though his Energy Score isn't a factor in things for the default normal role conversion for the game.
Not everything is 1+RPS though, for one thing, not everything uses RPS, but of those that do some might be 0+RPS or 2+RPS. To give you an idea here, stats can be from 0-2, nobody has a 0-0-0-0 stat going in, and everyone has that free point, so you can assume every player has at least a total of 2, and I'd say most characters on the master list have a total of 3 or 4 including free point... and stats were primarily attached to character, not to their role.
Now how this breaks down in terms of odds is that if you have a normal 1+RPS action, where you succeed if you tie or beat them, and where RPS=[-1,0,1] targeting someone with the following stats has the following odds of success:
1+RPS against attribute of:
O: 100% chance of success
1: 67% chance of success
2: 33% chance of success
0+RPS
O: 67% chance of success
1: 33% chance of success
2: 0% chance of success
2+RPS
O: 100% chance of success
1: 100% chance of success
2: 67% chance of success
So there's a little bit more flexibility here for use of normal roles, kinda why I like it, and there's also good room for tactics, and anything that let players gain advantage from deduction and cleverness always seems good to me. Because if you figure out what someone's RPS isn't, say rock, those odds above are going to change noticeably in your favor, and if you know what they have as opposed to what they don't, it's a done deal unless you're aiming a 0+RPS at someone with a 2.
Example
Johnny, a wizard has a 1+RPSE chance to track people, he targets Bob who has a E of 0, sending the mod Track Bob - Rock, unless Bob has Paper Johnny wins.
That's short hand, I generally try to make sure I don't use it in message to people, but if you see it, or if someone gets tired of typing out the full versions and wants to use it instead, there you go.
RPS - Rock, Paper, Scissors
RPSW - RPS that targets the Will attribute
RPSS - RPS that targets the Skill attribute
RPSE - RPS that targets the Energy attribute
RPSF - RPS that targets the Flesh attribute
RPSX - RPS that targets the attribute of your choice
And #+RPS or #+RPSX just means your score, like 1+RPSW, is 1 plus the RPS result (-1, 0, +1) against your target player's Will.
The default for the game equivalent of a 'normal role' is 1+RPS where one of the four attributes is pre-determined as the target. Their own attributes don't factor in to their 'attack' though there is generally some relation to it, a wizard throwing lightning bolts at you against your Energy skill is not likely to have a 0 in Energy, even though his Energy Score isn't a factor in things for the default normal role conversion for the game.
Not everything is 1+RPS though, for one thing, not everything uses RPS, but of those that do some might be 0+RPS or 2+RPS. To give you an idea here, stats can be from 0-2, nobody has a 0-0-0-0 stat going in, and everyone has that free point, so you can assume every player has at least a total of 2, and I'd say most characters on the master list have a total of 3 or 4 including free point... and stats were primarily attached to character, not to their role.
Now how this breaks down in terms of odds is that if you have a normal 1+RPS action, where you succeed if you tie or beat them, and where RPS=[-1,0,1] targeting someone with the following stats has the following odds of success:
1+RPS against attribute of:
O: 100% chance of success
1: 67% chance of success
2: 33% chance of success
0+RPS
O: 67% chance of success
1: 33% chance of success
2: 0% chance of success
2+RPS
O: 100% chance of success
1: 100% chance of success
2: 67% chance of success
So there's a little bit more flexibility here for use of normal roles, kinda why I like it, and there's also good room for tactics, and anything that let players gain advantage from deduction and cleverness always seems good to me. Because if you figure out what someone's RPS isn't, say rock, those odds above are going to change noticeably in your favor, and if you know what they have as opposed to what they don't, it's a done deal unless you're aiming a 0+RPS at someone with a 2.
Example
Johnny, a wizard has a 1+RPSE chance to track people, he targets Bob who has a E of 0, sending the mod Track Bob - Rock, unless Bob has Paper Johnny wins.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
This message last edited by Isaac on 26/07/2011 at 12:00:47 AM
Game 23: The Dresden Files Day 1 - Stormfront (Day Over)
25/07/2011 12:52:19 AM
- 3068 Views
Notes from Mod: Update 3
25/07/2011 12:52:45 AM
- 1950 Views

Why do I have 'stats'?
25/07/2011 12:53:10 AM
- 1963 Views
Some RPS Notes
25/07/2011 11:59:50 PM
- 1796 Views
Er. OK. Well, to start things off...
25/07/2011 03:32:21 AM
- 1641 Views
I'd actually like to say that I'm guessing half-humans and half-whatever might as well choose human
25/07/2011 07:14:15 PM
- 1569 Views
I'm human.
25/07/2011 09:49:57 PM
- 1603 Views
I agree, especially because Isaac has specifically countered this type of thinking.
26/07/2011 02:02:30 AM
- 1587 Views
Speaking of sides
26/07/2011 03:32:10 AM
- 1619 Views
Hm. OK, without spoilers, here's some background information
26/07/2011 01:56:43 PM
- 1855 Views
Oh, I'll also note that not everything supernatural is malicious
26/07/2011 02:06:22 PM
- 1586 Views
You know, I've never understood that.
26/07/2011 07:35:47 PM
- 1539 Views
I think it was that movie Brotherhood of the Wolf (Le pacte des loups)
26/07/2011 09:18:54 PM
- 1549 Views
Right then, some more thoughts
27/07/2011 02:20:32 PM
- 1571 Views
Re: Right then, some more thoughts
27/07/2011 03:50:51 PM
- 1617 Views
Hm. What are some other avenues?
27/07/2011 02:23:36 PM
- 1521 Views
I don't think random qquestion would be great here
27/07/2011 03:29:05 PM
- 1569 Views
Should we ask that? "On a scale of 1-10, how familiar are you with the books?"
27/07/2011 06:28:18 PM
- 1475 Views
Re: Should we ask that? "On a scale of 1-10, how familiar are you with the books?"
27/07/2011 06:33:32 PM
- 1566 Views
Should we ask that? "On a scale of 1-10, how familiar are you with the books?"
27/07/2011 06:35:25 PM
- 1520 Views
On a scale of 1-10, how familiar are you with the books? (CHART)
27/07/2011 06:40:15 PM
- 1576 Views
Like I said in an earlier thread, I've read the first book and watched 2/3 the series. *NM*
28/07/2011 12:07:06 AM
- 946 Views
Interlude 1
28/07/2011 02:08:46 AM
- 1652 Views
Interlude Conclusion
29/07/2011 02:23:35 AM
- 1445 Views
*cough*
30/07/2011 10:02:50 PM
- 1625 Views
Very confused right now...
30/07/2011 10:47:31 PM
- 1495 Views
This is discussed in the updates, particular #2... the posts with the lightsabers *NM*
30/07/2011 11:37:41 PM
- 882 Views
Did any of you have a reason for following who you did or was it just a random choice?
01/08/2011 01:14:13 PM
- 1626 Views
So, where did you go? *NM*
01/08/2011 09:21:05 PM
- 884 Views
Derp, for some reason I missed your response above. Ignore, please. *NM*
01/08/2011 09:21:47 PM
- 840 Views
I followed Sheridan...
01/08/2011 09:44:42 PM
- 1481 Views
Well, OK- we've got 5 more days, let's try to make some headway.
01/08/2011 01:39:48 PM
- 1559 Views
Re: Well, OK- we've got 5 more days, let's try to make some headway.
01/08/2011 01:56:45 PM
- 1560 Views
It might be me...
01/08/2011 03:51:50 PM
- 1591 Views
If you're constantly RBIRL, why would lynching you be a mistake?
01/08/2011 03:55:42 PM
- 1527 Views
Re: If you're constantly RBIRL, why would lynching you be a mistake?
01/08/2011 11:51:39 PM
- 1537 Views
Seems suboptimal.
01/08/2011 09:50:38 PM
- 1555 Views
Re: Seems suboptimal.
01/08/2011 11:52:55 PM
- 1605 Views
Everybody.
02/08/2011 04:08:53 AM
- 1578 Views
How about this?
02/08/2011 01:41:57 PM
- 1545 Views
Fair enough. I forgot we had a deadline.
02/08/2011 06:28:04 PM
- 1497 Views
Re: Fair enough. I forgot we had a deadline.
02/08/2011 06:33:46 PM
- 1473 Views
someone was in the room with him when i got there
02/08/2011 10:31:35 PM
- 1541 Views
What were they doing?
02/08/2011 11:11:56 PM
- 1503 Views
i don't know
02/08/2011 11:18:37 PM
- 1525 Views
Ooh. That sounds like a good basis for a semi-random lynch right there.
01/08/2011 11:56:20 PM
- 1492 Views
Also though, I do agree with your conclusions to a point,
01/08/2011 11:58:37 PM
- 1493 Views
Another possibility
02/08/2011 01:47:07 AM
- 1580 Views
Re: Another possibility
02/08/2011 01:40:23 PM
- 1577 Views
True- he DID have a "Ritual Knife," after all
02/08/2011 01:59:43 PM
- 1568 Views
I'm under the impression someone is lying out of Sheridan's group.
03/08/2011 02:18:45 AM
- 1462 Views
My thoughts are quite similar.
03/08/2011 03:41:15 AM
- 1544 Views
Re: My thoughts are quite similar.
03/08/2011 01:25:59 PM
- 1567 Views
That's not how initiative worked- rana could have shown up first
03/08/2011 02:25:24 PM
- 1574 Views
Re: That's not how initiative worked- rana could have shown up first
03/08/2011 03:47:17 PM
- 1601 Views
Would you mind breaking it down into a simple timeline?
03/08/2011 04:08:52 AM
- 1530 Views
Re: Would you mind breaking it down into a simple timeline?
03/08/2011 01:19:34 PM
- 1529 Views
Cool, thanks. Unfortunately, I still think anyone could be guilty.
03/08/2011 02:33:06 PM
- 1548 Views
Right now, we have about 2.5 days left.
04/08/2011 01:12:06 PM
- 1563 Views
Hm. I honestly suspect everyone pretty equally
04/08/2011 02:10:59 PM
- 1521 Views
im holding my vote for now
04/08/2011 11:41:10 PM
- 1545 Views
I would but I feel like that woul dbe irrelevant for this lynch anyway so why bother?
05/08/2011 01:21:29 AM
- 1478 Views
Right, so we're down to the wire- ranagrande or Yuna? *NM*
05/08/2011 01:45:55 PM
- 862 Views
Not sure, though I'd err toward rana.
05/08/2011 02:00:29 PM
- 1552 Views
Ok, I think its time we try and do something
05/08/2011 06:43:37 PM
- 1547 Views
I'm calling for a RC of ranagrande before we pull the trigger.
05/08/2011 06:58:26 PM
- 1566 Views
As I said, lynching me would be a mistake.
06/08/2011 01:41:31 PM
- 1614 Views
Haha, what?
06/08/2011 02:14:51 PM
- 1501 Views
I think he's trying to say he's a notorious busser. *NM*
06/08/2011 02:54:29 PM
- 783 Views
what a thing to be proud of *waggles finger at rana* boo hiss boo *NM*
06/08/2011 05:03:03 PM
- 863 Views
Vote: ranagrande
06/08/2011 08:50:40 PM
- 1481 Views
I won't stand for this! I challenge you to a duel! *NM*
06/08/2011 08:51:12 PM
- 786 Views
Very well. I accept. *NM*
06/08/2011 08:51:30 PM
- 852 Views
Huh, I confess I didn't actually think of that
06/08/2011 08:57:32 PM
- 1553 Views
...
06/08/2011 09:03:20 PM
- 1493 Views

lol you could just make it so a play can't vote for themselves.
06/08/2011 09:17:08 PM
- 1592 Views
That's probably what I'll have to do
06/08/2011 09:33:55 PM
- 1602 Views
Ha, ha, ha! Genius! *NM*
06/08/2011 10:08:30 PM
- 854 Views
clearly Genius has turned to madness *NM*
06/08/2011 10:13:58 PM
- 836 Views
Same thing really. Genius is madness to those who can't appreciate it
.
06/08/2011 10:18:26 PM
- 1501 Views

Roleclaim.
06/08/2011 09:12:29 PM
- 1511 Views
Re: Roleclaim.
07/08/2011 02:34:35 AM
- 1537 Views
True. Actions speak louder than words, in this case.
07/08/2011 09:25:26 PM
- 1600 Views
Lynch Reached - Duel Pending
08/08/2011 12:26:25 AM
- 1529 Views
Eh, I'm busy anyway.
08/08/2011 01:50:30 AM
- 1710 Views