Re: An informal agreement is probably the way to go then
Isaac Send a noteboard - 15/11/2011 03:43:39 AM
Well, I neutered it as best I could so it would only detect purely identical RM's, but as I said in the NB at the time, I was more than half convinced we had mass coppage going on. I didn't actually view it as a rules sidestep, the neutering was to minimize collateral damage if it wasn't the case as my head thought. Such a technique can only mean anything if the Mod's done identical wordings, which I never do and generally discourage... though it did win us the Tower game if you remember, that 'win with the Tower' bit let us run the table even with 3 scum and a SK in a game of 10, ditto game 2. Anyway, I don't encourage such sidesteps but I do consider it to be really more the responsibilityy of the Mod to make them impossible by changing up RM wording.
It also won us the first game I played here, with the vanillas banding together by identifying that they were all called "villagers" in the lore. Mind you, I wasn't a villager but I saw through that pretty fast, so maybe I could have turned it back against you had I been scum
.
.Yeah, that was the game 2 I mentioned. We were all pretty clueless in those early games, game 1 ended on Day 1, pity Marshall and CarnCarn didn't stick around to RAFO.
Anyway, think of it this way, what were you expecting to learn from this ploy that wasn't modtext (which the rules forbid divulging)?
Oh, it was a cheap ploy, I freely admit, that's why I didn't debate the ruling, strictly a raw fishing expedition. But we'd already done something similar with the RM poem.
It's hard to tell how much impact the poems ultimately had, I suspect they subconsciously clued me in but a lot of that's natural paranoia. Oh, the Titus thread's your turn again 

Yeah, I expect to update it tonight or tomorrow.
Excellent, we can continue to pass the hot potato on which of us has forgotten about it, I'm aiming for post #50 to arrive before AMoL or the next Martin book in the worst case scenario
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Game 24, Day 2 - Game has ended
- 06/11/2011 06:04:27 PM
1501 Views
I'm actually a bit surprised by the choice of ?
- 06/11/2011 07:34:57 PM
1358 Views
I think a second look at our poetry is in order too, now we have more of it
- 07/11/2011 12:43:21 AM
1192 Views
Re: I think a second look at our poetry is in order too, now we have more of it
- 07/11/2011 12:57:32 AM
1053 Views
... and the two things
- 07/11/2011 01:29:31 AM
1211 Views
UM UM UM ALERT ALERT ALERT
- 07/11/2011 02:59:27 PM
1003 Views
Re: UM UM UM ALERT ALERT ALERT
- 07/11/2011 06:23:42 PM
1115 Views
Re: UM UM UM ALERT ALERT ALERT
- 07/11/2011 08:17:53 PM
1028 Views
Wait, would everyone be picking their own two letters? Ah, ok, it's not as dangerous as I thought
- 07/11/2011 08:20:32 PM
1039 Views
no *NM*
- 07/11/2011 06:19:20 PM
596 Views
FT already banned it *NM*
- 07/11/2011 06:20:45 PM
574 Views
Vote: ?
- 07/11/2011 02:33:43 PM
1230 Views
He could have just been being polite
- 07/11/2011 06:34:30 PM
1440 Views
Very good point, I think a roleclaim from ?, using Kronin's coded roleclaim from yesterday
- 07/11/2011 08:22:45 PM
1186 Views
? can't decode Kronin's RC, and he wouldn't be allowed to give his own
- 07/11/2011 08:45:50 PM
1125 Views
yeah I could go ahead and roleclaim if you want...
- 07/11/2011 08:56:41 PM
1099 Views
No, I don't want you to claim
- 07/11/2011 08:57:47 PM
1013 Views
Wait what's the difference?
- 07/11/2011 09:06:06 PM
1026 Views
is this gonna turn into that game where i got lynched thrice in one game but for ? instead?
- 07/11/2011 10:24:15 PM
1101 Views
Anybody else get a chuckle out of this? *NM*
- 07/11/2011 06:36:28 PM
560 Views
out of what? *NM*
- 07/11/2011 07:51:06 PM
549 Views
you have to go into the messege like i said ignore the *NM* prompt *NM*
- 07/11/2011 08:54:22 PM
505 Views
Shrug, I think we should still get a roleclaim from ?/Kronin
- 08/11/2011 01:51:24 PM
1166 Views
I coded a claim above...in response to Isaac I think...
- 08/11/2011 08:46:07 PM
1098 Views
Vote: Beetnemesis
- 09/11/2011 10:24:06 PM
1248 Views
Bah, now I have to claim as well
- 09/11/2011 10:46:37 PM
1103 Views
decoding:
- 09/11/2011 11:22:31 PM
1140 Views
Would you mind walking through that last step?
- 09/11/2011 11:44:30 PM
1112 Views
Hmm...You mention me a lot in that post...Was that me as ? or me as Kronin? I'm a tad confused.
- 09/11/2011 11:28:55 PM
1217 Views
Is or Is Not a Cop (Table)
- 10/11/2011 12:52:52 AM
1149 Views
I'm the daycop. Vote: Ranagrande.
- 10/11/2011 01:41:59 AM
1072 Views
EBWOP: here's the code.
- 10/11/2011 01:43:00 AM
940 Views
EBWOP again
- 10/11/2011 01:44:04 AM
928 Views
Stand by for the moment
- 10/11/2011 01:49:38 AM
1104 Views
Jesus...I REALLY need to read everything before I start posting.
- 10/11/2011 01:54:11 AM
1107 Views
Add to that the next follow up, that ? might previously have been a Day Cop too
- 10/11/2011 02:04:29 AM
1170 Views
I am a daycop. I found Isaac innocent. *NM*
- 10/11/2011 02:02:05 PM
591 Views
We still need you role decode *NM*
- 10/11/2011 06:19:53 PM
507 Views
i am a cop
- 10/11/2011 07:00:14 PM
955 Views
Ah, I was wondering how come there was suddenly thirty new posts in this thread.
- 10/11/2011 03:02:10 AM
914 Views
Hahaha I have to read all of these posts, but FT, you're insane.
- 10/11/2011 01:58:01 PM
1184 Views
I think it's time to consider mass RC
- 10/11/2011 08:15:36 PM
1053 Views
Sure...
- 10/11/2011 09:19:49 PM
1260 Views
There's a lot of options still, and decode confirmed by the way
- 10/11/2011 09:48:05 PM
1269 Views
The wasy I see it, anybody not claiming cop is going to get lynched
- 10/11/2011 11:57:24 PM
1138 Views
Lying and claiming cop when you can't decode your RC will get you lynched faster. *NM*
- 11/11/2011 12:33:05 AM
505 Views
Fox, did you get a response on your investigation? *NM*
- 11/11/2011 12:20:12 AM
586 Views
I hadn't performed one yet.
- 11/11/2011 12:34:48 AM
1107 Views
I'll investigate ? because yuna's the other daycop
- 11/11/2011 04:00:49 AM
994 Views
Wait a minute....I meant that I would be testing it against rana. Not yuna
- 11/11/2011 01:39:16 PM
1251 Views
It kinda seems like Hieshyn and ? are our logical lynch targets, plus Cop (Table)
- 11/11/2011 10:09:52 PM
1291 Views
Vote: ?
- 11/11/2011 10:46:43 PM
967 Views
I'm down with voting for ?, as long as everyone is clear on what our night actions should be
- 12/11/2011 04:49:53 AM
1079 Views
Game ends.
- 14/11/2011 10:25:04 PM
1054 Views
Role list:
- 14/11/2011 10:26:32 PM
1107 Views
Jeeez.
- 14/11/2011 11:43:47 PM
1059 Views
Kronin originally RC as a Tracker so we might have done better if we had been able to continue *NM*
- 15/11/2011 12:06:07 AM
541 Views
Also I would like to be added to the list of future Moderator
- 15/11/2011 12:07:51 AM
929 Views
You'd have first dibs via our order of precedence system
- 15/11/2011 02:05:04 AM
1188 Views
Also whoever Mods should probably post a recruitment thread on some other NBs
- 15/11/2011 02:50:02 AM
1114 Views
I expect my next game to draw in some new players.
- 15/11/2011 02:58:59 AM
1076 Views
More is better, okay that would be Hieshyn or Beet then, unless ? wants to toss in
- 15/11/2011 03:26:25 AM
1052 Views
I don't have anything prepared, so if Hieshyn wants it, I'll be happy to go after him
- 15/11/2011 03:28:40 AM
1093 Views
I'm not ready to go next
- 15/11/2011 02:43:07 PM
1188 Views
Aight, I think it's me then.
- 15/11/2011 03:15:21 PM
957 Views
ooooh
- 15/11/2011 11:27:26 PM
970 Views
Before the next game starts, we probably need to discuss RC coding
- 15/11/2011 02:15:27 AM
1299 Views
Yeah, I really didn't like that idea.
- 15/11/2011 02:58:21 AM
1409 Views
An informal agreement is probably the way to go then
- 15/11/2011 03:08:17 AM
1213 Views
Although really, it's the same as if in IRL everyone just wrote down their role on a piece of paper
- 15/11/2011 03:28:00 AM
1088 Views
Yeah, I don't think it warrants being banned (hence why I didn't), but I don't like it. *NM*
- 15/11/2011 03:37:59 AM
578 Views
Re: An informal agreement is probably the way to go then
- 15/11/2011 03:36:38 AM
1110 Views
Re: An informal agreement is probably the way to go then
- 15/11/2011 03:43:39 AM
1433 Views

*NM*
*NM*
*NM*