So, we all say who we protected last night? As soon as we find the Doc, we can look back to the answers, see how was protected in the first Night, and maybe deduce who (if any) was targeted? Either there was no NK, or the NK was unsuccessful.
We may also get a clue about the infestation spreading. The protected person was not infected in that night. Assuming that protecting a person will also help against infestation. Which might not be the case...
Would it be useful? Who would be in favor of this?
We may also get a clue about the infestation spreading. The protected person was not infected in that night. Assuming that protecting a person will also help against infestation. Which might not be the case...
Would it be useful? Who would be in favor of this?
The mystery deepens... I think. *MySmiley*
Mafia Day 2 - Early Expansion
02/07/2012 09:18:28 AM
- 2023 Views
Also we might want to decode in whole or part
02/07/2012 12:53:30 PM
- 568 Views
Not in favor right now
02/07/2012 04:20:17 PM
- 585 Views
Hypocopping?
02/07/2012 03:42:46 PM
- 864 Views
Sure, why not. It's not like it would hurt us even if we gain nothing. *NM*
02/07/2012 04:40:23 PM
- 218 Views
Hah, I forgot about hypocopping. Sure, let's do it, I'll make a seperate post. *NM*
02/07/2012 06:04:03 PM
- 256 Views
If Hypocopping is a thing, is Metadoccing too?
03/07/2012 07:11:51 AM
- 464 Views
So, what should we do? *NM*
04/07/2012 04:00:50 PM
- 257 Views
Some next steps
04/07/2012 07:46:00 PM
- 589 Views
About exposing the doc...
05/07/2012 05:07:14 AM
- 449 Views
I have a stimpack as well.
05/07/2012 12:48:16 PM
- 480 Views
Actually I do
05/07/2012 03:02:30 PM
- 466 Views
So, did anyone have anything happen to them last night? *NM*
06/07/2012 08:06:30 PM
- 262 Views
Well, someone probably got a message saying 'You are now Zerg'...
07/07/2012 12:10:36 AM
- 470 Views
I suppose I'll share what happened to me last night.
07/07/2012 07:59:43 PM
- 504 Views
Let me probe on that one real quick
07/07/2012 08:46:45 PM
- 470 Views
Yes, it is specific.
07/07/2012 09:10:39 PM
- 444 Views
Re: Yes, it is specific.
07/07/2012 10:10:13 PM
- 484 Views
It was in my original role message. *NM*
07/07/2012 10:41:11 PM
- 273 Views
Oh well, I'll take the bait.
08/07/2012 01:33:28 AM
- 623 Views
EBWOP: Oh well, I'll take the bait.
08/07/2012 01:34:22 AM
- 647 Views
I actually kind of expected that
08/07/2012 01:38:48 AM
- 528 Views
Could hear a pindrop in here...
08/07/2012 06:31:22 AM
- 509 Views
Yeah, I went to bed just after posting that.
08/07/2012 11:47:01 AM
- 704 Views
Well I've got to say your encryption is, uh, vague
08/07/2012 06:58:13 PM
- 552 Views
Seems pretty straight forward. Vote: Isaac *NM*
09/07/2012 12:11:03 AM
- 208 Views
Hmm wait...
09/07/2012 01:49:23 AM
- 526 Views
The Casy name thing is in the message I got from FT.
09/07/2012 10:20:49 AM
- 673 Views
I am not voting at this time.
09/07/2012 06:47:18 PM
- 376 Views
This has none of my fingerprints on it, something is clearly up and it literally can't be my doing
09/07/2012 08:59:45 PM
- 505 Views
Vote: Stephen
09/07/2012 11:59:46 PM
- 433 Views
You mean the whole thing where I have been brutally honest and told you everything.
10/07/2012 12:12:06 AM
- 696 Views
No, I mean the totally useless bogus encryption. *NM*
10/07/2012 12:26:26 AM
- 245 Views
Useless and bogus?
10/07/2012 02:04:40 PM
- 642 Views
The main complaint is that your code doesn't contain any role information- HOWEVER
10/07/2012 03:01:45 PM
- 584 Views
Isaac- you said you have a stimpack that doesn't protect against infestation?
10/07/2012 04:40:18 AM
- 1013 Views
Not explicitly, that's why I was fishing with Ranagrande
10/07/2012 05:15:47 AM
- 424 Views
Oh, I see....
10/07/2012 07:10:13 AM
- 578 Views
Vote: Isaac (again)
10/07/2012 03:03:04 PM
- 703 Views
Vote: Stephen, but FOS: Beet, what heck?
10/07/2012 06:58:10 PM
- 505 Views
Unvote. Didn't you claim different symptoms than everyone else, though?
10/07/2012 09:18:38 PM
- 638 Views
Specifically I claimed a symptom that wasn't explcitly listed as one in my RM
10/07/2012 11:01:57 PM
- 447 Views