Active Users:637 Time:22/03/2026 04:12:29 AM
About that last one Artsapat Send a noteboard - 10/07/2012 08:27:35 AM
And right now the others are seeing a murky cloud of weirdness going on and that makes them look at me, but you know me better, and you're a schemer too. I'm good, but I can't make people produce series of errors like that. All the weirdness, none of it can be of my doing. I couldn't make Stephen botch his coded RC, present a needless and risky HC, or risk killing himself and outing our cop by apparently claiming to be cop with no evidence to back it up via coded RC.


The whole point of a HC is that you can claim a result and if you are killed and we find out you were the cop, we can use the information later on. If he's really the cop, this is not a needless and risky HC, it's his job. He just got lucky on the first night. Are you suggesting he should have posted a random result, just because he didn't have hard proof? That defies all the reasons we do HCing.

ASKING for the HC was a strange step, though, but that doesn't make it "Top Ten anti-town actions". Precisely because he didn't have the hard evidence, he wanted to do it via HC and maybe survive and be useful for an extra Night. Then he got baited and therefore claimed more than he intended to at first. (Which was inevitable, but he could have thought it was worth a try.) Granted, the RC and "also coding" was not a really strong move either, but still not Top Ten.

What is suspicious is that you baited Stephen, just because he HC'ed you. Most people wouldn't be concerned, as a HC from a non-cop is random. The only reason why you would want to bait somebody is when you're found guilty AND YOU ARE. You need to find out if it's a random fluke, or if there's a change of the cop staying around. If it's a real cop: he needs to be killed as soon as the sun sets and everybody understands that as soon as he's exposed. If it's a random fluke: he might still get killed at night and everybody will understand that, but you have your hands free as a scummer to do something else. If he survives the Night he will look even more suspicious to the rest and get Lynched Tomorrow. Either way, there's still a chance he might get Lynched Today as a result from the discussion. Win-win for the Scums.

I stick to my vote. Also because you get more verbose as soon as you're about to get exposed, and because you are a logical first person to target from a Cult Leader POV.

Remember, whatever the actions of Day 1: working on the Cult theory, everybody was Town, except for the SK and the Cult Leader. So we're looking for changes in behavior, not just for strange events in Day 1. If Stephen is Scum, he's either the Cult leader or he was Town on Day 1. So: if Isaac turns out to be Town, we Lynch Stephen Tomorrow and the head's cut of: Win.
The mystery deepens... I think. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Mafia Day 2 - Early Expansion - 02/07/2012 09:18:28 AM 2107 Views
Crew Status - 02/07/2012 09:19:36 AM 565 Views
Zerg Cult seems pretty probable right now, so let's analyze that - 02/07/2012 11:39:47 AM 667 Views
Also we might want to decode in whole or part - 02/07/2012 12:53:30 PM 640 Views
Decoding sounds good. *NM* - 02/07/2012 03:41:06 PM 451 Views
Not in favor right now - 02/07/2012 04:20:17 PM 655 Views
Ow, wait, I think I see what you mean now - 02/07/2012 04:23:19 PM 538 Views
No, I actually forgot the doc's name-tied. - 02/07/2012 04:31:32 PM 615 Views
Re: Not in favor right now - 02/07/2012 05:50:36 PM 510 Views
Hypocopping? - 02/07/2012 03:42:46 PM 937 Views
Hypocop thread! (Table) - 02/07/2012 06:09:27 PM 594 Views
Re: Hypocop thread! (Table) - 02/07/2012 06:39:16 PM 657 Views
Re: Hypocop thread! (Table) - 02/07/2012 11:20:44 PM 576 Views
I found myself to be innocent - 02/07/2012 11:53:41 PM 599 Views
I found Bergioyn innocent. *NM* - 02/07/2012 11:55:34 PM 282 Views
I found Isaac to be guilty *NM* - 03/07/2012 02:21:35 PM 462 Views
I found Bergioyn to be guilty *NM* - 03/07/2012 06:38:44 PM 279 Views
If Hypocopping is a thing, is Metadoccing too? - 03/07/2012 07:11:51 AM 537 Views
You can do it as is with the HC, but it serves little point - 03/07/2012 02:10:32 PM 635 Views
What's your hypocop? *NM* - 03/07/2012 03:00:36 PM 288 Views
So, what should we do? *NM* - 04/07/2012 04:00:50 PM 285 Views
Some next steps - 04/07/2012 07:46:00 PM 680 Views
About exposing the doc... - 05/07/2012 05:07:14 AM 516 Views
I have a stimpack as well. - 05/07/2012 12:48:16 PM 545 Views
Actually I do - 05/07/2012 03:02:30 PM 535 Views
So... - 05/07/2012 03:19:21 PM 507 Views
Re: So... - 05/07/2012 08:50:37 PM 660 Views
I...still don't get your logic here. - 06/07/2012 01:36:23 AM 595 Views
Re: Actually I do - 05/07/2012 03:42:29 PM 576 Views
I do not have a stimpack. *NM* - 06/07/2012 01:58:00 PM 375 Views
Woah. *NM* - 06/07/2012 03:17:40 PM 239 Views
RBIRL for the weekend. - 05/07/2012 07:12:35 AM 647 Views
So I'm still here. - 07/07/2012 10:06:47 PM 664 Views
So, did anyone have anything happen to them last night? *NM* - 06/07/2012 08:06:30 PM 297 Views
Well, someone probably got a message saying 'You are now Zerg'... - 07/07/2012 12:10:36 AM 554 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 07/07/2012 10:50:18 AM 315 Views
I suppose I'll share what happened to me last night. - 07/07/2012 07:59:43 PM 580 Views
Let me probe on that one real quick - 07/07/2012 08:46:45 PM 544 Views
Yes, it is specific. - 07/07/2012 09:10:39 PM 519 Views
Re: Yes, it is specific. - 07/07/2012 10:10:13 PM 562 Views
It was in my original role message. *NM* - 07/07/2012 10:41:11 PM 302 Views
Okay, that's a bit different then - 07/07/2012 11:04:24 PM 591 Views
I was intentionally ambiguous. - 07/07/2012 11:13:45 PM 524 Views
Oh well, I'll take the bait. - 08/07/2012 01:33:28 AM 687 Views
EBWOP: Oh well, I'll take the bait. - 08/07/2012 01:34:22 AM 720 Views
I actually kind of expected that - 08/07/2012 01:38:48 AM 600 Views
Could hear a pindrop in here... - 08/07/2012 06:31:22 AM 580 Views
Re: Could hear a pindrop in here... - 08/07/2012 08:01:21 AM 581 Views
Yeah, I went to bed just after posting that. - 08/07/2012 11:47:01 AM 766 Views
Well I've got to say your encryption is, uh, vague - 08/07/2012 06:58:13 PM 621 Views
...wait, what? - 08/07/2012 11:38:20 PM 649 Views
Re: ...wait, what? - 09/07/2012 12:24:45 AM 624 Views
So... what does that mean? - 08/07/2012 11:39:58 PM 562 Views
I'm a Ghost Agent - 09/07/2012 10:19:31 AM 782 Views
Seems pretty straight forward. Vote: Isaac *NM* - 09/07/2012 12:11:03 AM 237 Views
Hmm wait... - 09/07/2012 01:49:23 AM 603 Views
The Casy name thing is in the message I got from FT. - 09/07/2012 10:20:49 AM 741 Views
Okay. - 09/07/2012 12:05:16 PM 707 Views
I'll direct you to my reply to Isaac. - 09/07/2012 12:22:59 PM 725 Views
RBIRL until Sunday night *NM* - 07/07/2012 03:22:35 AM 234 Views
Vote: Isaac - 09/07/2012 05:26:26 PM 691 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac - 09/07/2012 06:36:47 PM 567 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac - 09/07/2012 09:41:55 PM 596 Views
I am not voting at this time. - 09/07/2012 06:47:18 PM 452 Views
This has none of my fingerprints on it, something is clearly up and it literally can't be my doing - 09/07/2012 08:59:45 PM 571 Views
Unvote for now- but I have a question below. - 10/07/2012 04:38:27 AM 656 Views
About that last one - 10/07/2012 08:27:35 AM 595 Views
Vote: Stephen - 09/07/2012 11:59:46 PM 503 Views
You mean the whole thing where I have been brutally honest and told you everything. - 10/07/2012 12:12:06 AM 808 Views
No, I mean the totally useless bogus encryption. *NM* - 10/07/2012 12:26:26 AM 276 Views
Useless and bogus? - 10/07/2012 02:04:40 PM 724 Views
Vote: Stephen - 10/07/2012 04:34:03 AM 582 Views
Isaac- you said you have a stimpack that doesn't protect against infestation? - 10/07/2012 04:40:18 AM 1079 Views
Not explicitly, that's why I was fishing with Ranagrande - 10/07/2012 05:15:47 AM 490 Views
Oh, I see.... - 10/07/2012 07:10:13 AM 671 Views
From your Night Message? - 10/07/2012 08:04:03 AM 511 Views
I was protected and not targeted, to my knowledge. *NM* - 10/07/2012 08:14:47 AM 309 Views
Re: Oh, I see.... - 10/07/2012 09:17:25 AM 589 Views
Vote: Isaac (again) - 10/07/2012 03:03:04 PM 770 Views
Vote: Stephen, but FOS: Beet, what heck? - 10/07/2012 06:58:10 PM 584 Views
Congratulations, ?! You get to cast the deciding vote! - 10/07/2012 04:49:20 PM 576 Views
None at all. *NM* - 10/07/2012 05:05:51 PM 467 Views
Oh wonderful. - 10/07/2012 05:38:45 PM 736 Views
Unvote - 10/07/2012 07:40:34 PM 491 Views
Re: Unvote - 10/07/2012 08:32:06 PM 662 Views
Stephen lynched - 11/07/2012 02:00:24 AM 651 Views
Ha! Nice reference. *NM* - 11/07/2012 04:15:36 AM 372 Views
Nice death scene. *NM* - 11/07/2012 03:39:40 PM 445 Views
I hate to say I told you so, but ... - 12/07/2012 09:13:09 AM 500 Views

Reply to Message