The main complaint is that your code doesn't contain any role information- HOWEVER
beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 10/07/2012 03:01:45 PM
My operative name is Flash. I coded this fact. I then revealed this fact. How is this useless and bogus?
And really, that is kind of annoying, given that the purpose of coding things is so that when you claim them later you have at least a semi-credible form of proof.
Yet you did your code, with nothing mentioned about a Ghost or one-off powers at all.
HOWEVER... everyone seems to be forgetting that we did, actually, only agree to code our "names."
As Isaac said in the Coded Names Chart post:
Just name, if you want to do role too include a second clearly distinct cipher and use a different key for it.
We're starting to go around in circles. I'm voting for Isaac, and if he's not infected, I'm voting for Stephen tomorrow.
I amuse myself.
Mafia Day 2 - Early Expansion
- 02/07/2012 09:18:28 AM
2107 Views
Also we might want to decode in whole or part
- 02/07/2012 12:53:30 PM
640 Views
Not in favor right now
- 02/07/2012 04:20:17 PM
655 Views
Hypocopping?
- 02/07/2012 03:42:46 PM
937 Views
Sure, why not. It's not like it would hurt us even if we gain nothing. *NM*
- 02/07/2012 04:40:23 PM
247 Views
Hah, I forgot about hypocopping. Sure, let's do it, I'll make a seperate post. *NM*
- 02/07/2012 06:04:03 PM
291 Views
So, what should we do? *NM*
- 04/07/2012 04:00:50 PM
285 Views
Some next steps
- 04/07/2012 07:46:00 PM
682 Views
About exposing the doc...
- 05/07/2012 05:07:14 AM
517 Views
I have a stimpack as well.
- 05/07/2012 12:48:16 PM
547 Views
Actually I do
- 05/07/2012 03:02:30 PM
535 Views
So, did anyone have anything happen to them last night? *NM*
- 06/07/2012 08:06:30 PM
297 Views
Well, someone probably got a message saying 'You are now Zerg'...
- 07/07/2012 12:10:36 AM
554 Views
I suppose I'll share what happened to me last night.
- 07/07/2012 07:59:43 PM
582 Views
Let me probe on that one real quick
- 07/07/2012 08:46:45 PM
544 Views
Yes, it is specific.
- 07/07/2012 09:10:39 PM
519 Views
Re: Yes, it is specific.
- 07/07/2012 10:10:13 PM
562 Views
It was in my original role message. *NM*
- 07/07/2012 10:41:11 PM
302 Views
Oh well, I'll take the bait.
- 08/07/2012 01:33:28 AM
688 Views
EBWOP: Oh well, I'll take the bait.
- 08/07/2012 01:34:22 AM
722 Views
I actually kind of expected that
- 08/07/2012 01:38:48 AM
600 Views
Could hear a pindrop in here...
- 08/07/2012 06:31:22 AM
580 Views
Yeah, I went to bed just after posting that.
- 08/07/2012 11:47:01 AM
768 Views
Well I've got to say your encryption is, uh, vague
- 08/07/2012 06:58:13 PM
621 Views
Seems pretty straight forward. Vote: Isaac *NM*
- 09/07/2012 12:11:03 AM
237 Views
Hmm wait...
- 09/07/2012 01:49:23 AM
605 Views
The Casy name thing is in the message I got from FT.
- 09/07/2012 10:20:49 AM
741 Views
I am not voting at this time.
- 09/07/2012 06:47:18 PM
453 Views
This has none of my fingerprints on it, something is clearly up and it literally can't be my doing
- 09/07/2012 08:59:45 PM
571 Views
Vote: Stephen
- 09/07/2012 11:59:46 PM
505 Views
You mean the whole thing where I have been brutally honest and told you everything.
- 10/07/2012 12:12:06 AM
808 Views
No, I mean the totally useless bogus encryption. *NM*
- 10/07/2012 12:26:26 AM
276 Views
Useless and bogus?
- 10/07/2012 02:04:40 PM
726 Views
The main complaint is that your code doesn't contain any role information- HOWEVER
- 10/07/2012 03:01:45 PM
652 Views
Isaac- you said you have a stimpack that doesn't protect against infestation?
- 10/07/2012 04:40:18 AM
1079 Views
Not explicitly, that's why I was fishing with Ranagrande
- 10/07/2012 05:15:47 AM
491 Views
Oh, I see....
- 10/07/2012 07:10:13 AM
672 Views
Vote: Isaac (again)
- 10/07/2012 03:03:04 PM
772 Views
Vote: Stephen, but FOS: Beet, what heck?
- 10/07/2012 06:58:10 PM
584 Views
Unvote. Didn't you claim different symptoms than everyone else, though?
- 10/07/2012 09:18:38 PM
706 Views
Specifically I claimed a symptom that wasn't explcitly listed as one in my RM
- 10/07/2012 11:01:57 PM
521 Views
