The main complaint is that your code doesn't contain any role information- HOWEVER
beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 10/07/2012 03:01:45 PM
My operative name is Flash. I coded this fact. I then revealed this fact. How is this useless and bogus?
And really, that is kind of annoying, given that the purpose of coding things is so that when you claim them later you have at least a semi-credible form of proof.
Yet you did your code, with nothing mentioned about a Ghost or one-off powers at all.
HOWEVER... everyone seems to be forgetting that we did, actually, only agree to code our "names."
As Isaac said in the Coded Names Chart post:
Just name, if you want to do role too include a second clearly distinct cipher and use a different key for it.
We're starting to go around in circles. I'm voting for Isaac, and if he's not infected, I'm voting for Stephen tomorrow.
I amuse myself.
Mafia Day 2 - Early Expansion
- 02/07/2012 09:18:28 AM
2110 Views
Also we might want to decode in whole or part
- 02/07/2012 12:53:30 PM
643 Views
Not in favor right now
- 02/07/2012 04:20:17 PM
658 Views
Hypocopping?
- 02/07/2012 03:42:46 PM
939 Views
Sure, why not. It's not like it would hurt us even if we gain nothing. *NM*
- 02/07/2012 04:40:23 PM
247 Views
Hah, I forgot about hypocopping. Sure, let's do it, I'll make a seperate post. *NM*
- 02/07/2012 06:04:03 PM
291 Views
So, what should we do? *NM*
- 04/07/2012 04:00:50 PM
285 Views
Some next steps
- 04/07/2012 07:46:00 PM
684 Views
About exposing the doc...
- 05/07/2012 05:07:14 AM
519 Views
I have a stimpack as well.
- 05/07/2012 12:48:16 PM
549 Views
Actually I do
- 05/07/2012 03:02:30 PM
539 Views
So, did anyone have anything happen to them last night? *NM*
- 06/07/2012 08:06:30 PM
297 Views
Well, someone probably got a message saying 'You are now Zerg'...
- 07/07/2012 12:10:36 AM
557 Views
I suppose I'll share what happened to me last night.
- 07/07/2012 07:59:43 PM
584 Views
Let me probe on that one real quick
- 07/07/2012 08:46:45 PM
547 Views
Yes, it is specific.
- 07/07/2012 09:10:39 PM
523 Views
Re: Yes, it is specific.
- 07/07/2012 10:10:13 PM
566 Views
It was in my original role message. *NM*
- 07/07/2012 10:41:11 PM
302 Views
Oh well, I'll take the bait.
- 08/07/2012 01:33:28 AM
690 Views
EBWOP: Oh well, I'll take the bait.
- 08/07/2012 01:34:22 AM
723 Views
I actually kind of expected that
- 08/07/2012 01:38:48 AM
604 Views
Could hear a pindrop in here...
- 08/07/2012 06:31:22 AM
582 Views
Yeah, I went to bed just after posting that.
- 08/07/2012 11:47:01 AM
769 Views
Well I've got to say your encryption is, uh, vague
- 08/07/2012 06:58:13 PM
624 Views
Seems pretty straight forward. Vote: Isaac *NM*
- 09/07/2012 12:11:03 AM
237 Views
Hmm wait...
- 09/07/2012 01:49:23 AM
605 Views
The Casy name thing is in the message I got from FT.
- 09/07/2012 10:20:49 AM
744 Views
I am not voting at this time.
- 09/07/2012 06:47:18 PM
455 Views
This has none of my fingerprints on it, something is clearly up and it literally can't be my doing
- 09/07/2012 08:59:45 PM
573 Views
Vote: Stephen
- 09/07/2012 11:59:46 PM
507 Views
You mean the whole thing where I have been brutally honest and told you everything.
- 10/07/2012 12:12:06 AM
812 Views
No, I mean the totally useless bogus encryption. *NM*
- 10/07/2012 12:26:26 AM
276 Views
Useless and bogus?
- 10/07/2012 02:04:40 PM
727 Views
The main complaint is that your code doesn't contain any role information- HOWEVER
- 10/07/2012 03:01:45 PM
653 Views
Isaac- you said you have a stimpack that doesn't protect against infestation?
- 10/07/2012 04:40:18 AM
1081 Views
Not explicitly, that's why I was fishing with Ranagrande
- 10/07/2012 05:15:47 AM
491 Views
Oh, I see....
- 10/07/2012 07:10:13 AM
674 Views
Vote: Isaac (again)
- 10/07/2012 03:03:04 PM
774 Views
Vote: Stephen, but FOS: Beet, what heck?
- 10/07/2012 06:58:10 PM
586 Views
Unvote. Didn't you claim different symptoms than everyone else, though?
- 10/07/2012 09:18:38 PM
708 Views
Specifically I claimed a symptom that wasn't explcitly listed as one in my RM
- 10/07/2012 11:01:57 PM
522 Views
