The main complaint is that your code doesn't contain any role information- HOWEVER
beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 10/07/2012 03:01:45 PM
My operative name is Flash. I coded this fact. I then revealed this fact. How is this useless and bogus?
And really, that is kind of annoying, given that the purpose of coding things is so that when you claim them later you have at least a semi-credible form of proof.
Yet you did your code, with nothing mentioned about a Ghost or one-off powers at all.
HOWEVER... everyone seems to be forgetting that we did, actually, only agree to code our "names."
As Isaac said in the Coded Names Chart post:
Just name, if you want to do role too include a second clearly distinct cipher and use a different key for it.
We're starting to go around in circles. I'm voting for Isaac, and if he's not infected, I'm voting for Stephen tomorrow.
I amuse myself.
Mafia Day 2 - Early Expansion
- 02/07/2012 09:18:28 AM
2161 Views
Also we might want to decode in whole or part
- 02/07/2012 12:53:30 PM
704 Views
Not in favor right now
- 02/07/2012 04:20:17 PM
710 Views
Hypocopping?
- 02/07/2012 03:42:46 PM
996 Views
Sure, why not. It's not like it would hurt us even if we gain nothing. *NM*
- 02/07/2012 04:40:23 PM
283 Views
Hah, I forgot about hypocopping. Sure, let's do it, I'll make a seperate post. *NM*
- 02/07/2012 06:04:03 PM
322 Views
So, what should we do? *NM*
- 04/07/2012 04:00:50 PM
318 Views
Some next steps
- 04/07/2012 07:46:00 PM
746 Views
About exposing the doc...
- 05/07/2012 05:07:14 AM
571 Views
I have a stimpack as well.
- 05/07/2012 12:48:16 PM
604 Views
Actually I do
- 05/07/2012 03:02:30 PM
598 Views
So, did anyone have anything happen to them last night? *NM*
- 06/07/2012 08:06:30 PM
339 Views
Well, someone probably got a message saying 'You are now Zerg'...
- 07/07/2012 12:10:36 AM
619 Views
I suppose I'll share what happened to me last night.
- 07/07/2012 07:59:43 PM
644 Views
Let me probe on that one real quick
- 07/07/2012 08:46:45 PM
596 Views
Yes, it is specific.
- 07/07/2012 09:10:39 PM
572 Views
Re: Yes, it is specific.
- 07/07/2012 10:10:13 PM
624 Views
It was in my original role message. *NM*
- 07/07/2012 10:41:11 PM
334 Views
Oh well, I'll take the bait.
- 08/07/2012 01:33:28 AM
743 Views
EBWOP: Oh well, I'll take the bait.
- 08/07/2012 01:34:22 AM
775 Views
I actually kind of expected that
- 08/07/2012 01:38:48 AM
654 Views
Could hear a pindrop in here...
- 08/07/2012 06:31:22 AM
635 Views
Yeah, I went to bed just after posting that.
- 08/07/2012 11:47:01 AM
829 Views
Well I've got to say your encryption is, uh, vague
- 08/07/2012 06:58:13 PM
676 Views
Seems pretty straight forward. Vote: Isaac *NM*
- 09/07/2012 12:11:03 AM
268 Views
Hmm wait...
- 09/07/2012 01:49:23 AM
660 Views
The Casy name thing is in the message I got from FT.
- 09/07/2012 10:20:49 AM
802 Views
I am not voting at this time.
- 09/07/2012 06:47:18 PM
503 Views
This has none of my fingerprints on it, something is clearly up and it literally can't be my doing
- 09/07/2012 08:59:45 PM
626 Views
Vote: Stephen
- 09/07/2012 11:59:46 PM
551 Views
You mean the whole thing where I have been brutally honest and told you everything.
- 10/07/2012 12:12:06 AM
880 Views
No, I mean the totally useless bogus encryption. *NM*
- 10/07/2012 12:26:26 AM
320 Views
Useless and bogus?
- 10/07/2012 02:04:40 PM
780 Views
The main complaint is that your code doesn't contain any role information- HOWEVER
- 10/07/2012 03:01:45 PM
711 Views
Isaac- you said you have a stimpack that doesn't protect against infestation?
- 10/07/2012 04:40:18 AM
1131 Views
Not explicitly, that's why I was fishing with Ranagrande
- 10/07/2012 05:15:47 AM
543 Views
Oh, I see....
- 10/07/2012 07:10:13 AM
727 Views
Vote: Isaac (again)
- 10/07/2012 03:03:04 PM
821 Views
Vote: Stephen, but FOS: Beet, what heck?
- 10/07/2012 06:58:10 PM
633 Views
Unvote. Didn't you claim different symptoms than everyone else, though?
- 10/07/2012 09:18:38 PM
761 Views
Specifically I claimed a symptom that wasn't explcitly listed as one in my RM
- 10/07/2012 11:01:57 PM
572 Views
