Active Users:465 Time:18/09/2025 06:33:10 AM
Yet you still refuse to roleclaim, are you suicidal? Isaac Send a noteboard - 09/08/2013 07:04:40 PM

View original post
View original post1) He was originally flagged as suspicious for minimal participation, considered an anti-town action. He came up lowest in 4 methods:


View original postI did- was busy at work, and since not much conversation had happened, I hadn't made a substantial post yet.

That's not rebuttal it is an excuse, you could have posted RBIRL, of course you might not know what the term means, it hasn't been in use quite as long as "bussing" and I'm not if you ever asked and were told what it means.


View original post
View original post2) Upon coming up topping all those methods he posted in to hypothesize about game make up, at which point I felt his suggestions strongly implied he possessed some game relevant information as the suggestions were otherwise random and counter-indicated by the minimal knowledge of the game we had. The principle theories raised focused on multiple scum factions, a rare thing in a game of this size and while grounds for a mod to want many players to help absorb the extra night kills it is very definitely not a reason for a Mod to want 12 players. All options focused on an abnormally powerful scum faction(s).


View original postWhat I find interesting is that, despite your criticisms, no one has been able to come up with a good reason that Bergioyn asked for specifically 12 players. And I stand by my point that if it was as simple as "doc, cop, and some townies" vs "scum and a roleblocker," that he would not need a specific number- 11 or 13 is just as workable.

No one knows why as we have no evidence as to why, all of us could speculate wildly about it, he may simply have wanted a classic 12 player game, there are a virtually unlimited number of scenarios which fit it, I could fill pages with them and none would have anything to back them up, hence why I haven't speculated and why I think most haven't, beyond what many of us have said which is that we don't know what is going on. You either know something and are now lying about it or were speculating totally at random to know conceivable gain for the town. You could have simply stopped at saying "12 seemed important, we might want to consider why?", now apparently some others hadn't already noticed that, I assumed most of us caught that before the game began, so I may have been overly harsh by assuming everything you said was totally pointless but your reactions after that have increasingly led me to believe you're lying.


View original postMy post was based on guesswork and extrapolation- which, for Day One, is pretty much all there is to go on.


View original post
View original post3) He accused me, on the grounds I clearly thought he knew something, though he claims to know nothing. This accusation to be logically coherent would require A) That he had guessed and guessed correctly and B) That I was a scummer and C) that I would believe he had not guessed and D) That with all of these I would tip my hand so out of character and incredibly clumsily of fashions. All 4 of these improbable conditions must be true for his accusation to be viable, and thus far he has not even confirmed the first one, he has not yet denied having extra knowledge and has IMO sought to imply he did even as he presents an accusation that can only be true if he does not.


View original postI accused you because you were being uncharacteristically aggressive. We don't need the universe to form a once in a lifetime conflux for you to be scum. It's just as simple to say:

Uncharacteristically aggressive? The overwhelming majority of Day 1 lynches has been initiated and prosecuted by either myself or FT, I suspect if you added them up we'd each have more than every other player, present or past, combined. How could I even be uncharacteristically aggressive, I have in the past actually threatened to kill players if they did not vote with me, and done it too. I'm pretty sure in order to be uncharacteristically aggressive I'd have to do as Danny suggested earlier and actually show up at a players house with baseball bat in hand.


View original posta)That you saw me post something that you thought you could seize on

Problem here, I seized on it, but not to accuse you, I considered you're remarks to be strongly indicative of more info and asked for it, if my tone was abrupt it was related to us spinning our wheels trying to find information only to find out a player who hadn't been posting seemed to have what we needed. That's not accusation, that's inquiry.


View original postb)That for whatever reason (either that I hit close to home, or that I was simply a target of opportunity) you figured the best defense was a strong offense

Best Defense? No one was even accusing me except Danny and he's been accused by others for his accusation. What could I possibly have needed to defend myself from?


View original postI haven't implied I have any extra knowledge beyond the ability to do simple arithmetic.

Well that's a lie, you've outright said you've got the special ability to read my motives and alignment, but in terms of game knowledge, I disagree. I think you intentionally were trying to call game options into play. The alternative, that you claim is true, is hardly more flattering, after being threatened with death for non-participation to avoid it you spewed out several random unsupported theories that served zero purpose but to distract us.


View original post
View original post4) He was asked by multiple players to role claim, a customary request when one is considered a primary lynch candidate, which is obviously the case. He was also reminded that any delay would damage the credibility of his claim, he has neither roleclaimed nor offered any defense or reason why he should not.


View original postI believe "roleclaim" has come up... twice? Ranagrande just (as in, TODAY) asked for one, and I believe someone mentioned it at the beginning of your attack. I'll respond to ranagrande shortly, and I ignored the original one because it was early in the day, and there was no particular push for a roleclaim (and I had other posts to respond to)

Twice? It was 7 when you wrote this and 6 when rana said 'several', 4 directly asking and two by voting with us. Ranagrande said "Several people have called for a roleclaim from beet", and he was right. Every vote on you, (4 - me, FT, Yuna, Fox ), backs a request for a roleclaim, then there's Rana, 5, and Hobo, 6, and Artsapat, 7.

That leaves Praz, ST (silent), Danny (RBIRL) and Taiga. 7 of 11 have either voted for your, demanded an RC, or both. We may safely assume the people voting for you want an RC too. That leaves 4 players, and we can drop the 2 who are both quiet and new, leaving PRaz and Taiga, neither of whom have defended you, 7-0 demanding an RC.


View original post
View original post5) In his remarks he referenced being 'bussed', a term regularly used here and exclusively to refer to when a scummer votes for another scummer. Revealing slips of this nature are not unheard of even very rare, but may be sheer accident so he was asked to explain it. Rather than claiming it was an innocent slip of words he instead claimed the term did not mean that, and replied evasively when told by the two most senior players that it only means that, including citations of the mafiascum wiki and a post where he himself asked what the term meant and was told, in absolutely unambiguous language, what the term meant, by the moderator of the game herself. He was also challenged to find any use by any player if the term in which his definition was used or even a definition other than the one given. He has not done so, instead claiming that even taking note of the usage is 'grasping at straws', this is not a proper offense but is instead an attempt to discredit the accusation rather than justify his own actions.


View original postThis entire point is laughable. What it boils down to is that I mixed up the meanings of "bussed" and "bandwagoned." I apologize that the instruction I received 4 years ago (from a mod nonwithstanding) was not seared into my brain.

I'm pretty sure I learned what the term "Internet" meant more than 4 years ago, but its constant reinforcement makes that timeline irrelevant. The word "Bussing" has been used 98 times and "bussed" 53 times since we came to RAFO, you presumably after being told what it meant might have forgotten. But bringing up the 4 year ago incident proves you inquired and were told by an unimpeachable source you'd have read, that's hwy that matters, you keep trying to wave it away but it establishes you knew, now you're claiming to have forgotten but to do that you'd have had to misundertand it being referenced 150 times since then, not even including simple uses of "Bus" which appears 100 more times. We've had about 20 games since then averaging around 4 days a game, meaning the term gets used about 3 times per game Day. You are claiming that in spite having it clearly and explicitly explained to you by the mod after you asked what it meant you not only forgot (improbable) but did so even with it coming up on average multiple times per game day.

Well, there is something laughable about the situation but I don't think it relates to my arguments.


View original post
View original post6) His entire defense now rests on a counter-accusation at myself,


View original postActually, my entire defense rests on the fact that I've done nothing wrong. My OFFENSE rests on the fact that anyone who's played with you should be able to realize that you have an agenda.

Of course I have an agenda, I should imagine everyone here does but me? Seriously? Hell, next you can defend yourself by claiming that water is wet.


View original postThis isn't an either-or, and the fact that you're trying to make it one further speaks to your duplicity.

This isn't either-or? You're the one who reacted to my - admittedly strongly worded - request for you to reveal any knowledge you had with accusations. You could have simply said, "Sorry if I implied special knowledge, I was thinking out loud. I just wanted to make sure everyone knew I was paying attention" and I would have glared at you with some suspicion, then shrugged and moved to other avenues.


View original postIsaac became aggressive towards me immediately after my big post. His entire case against me boils down to:


View original post- beetnemesis made a rambling post with some odd theories


View original postHis other points are just bits and pieces he's picked up to try to make it seem like he has a legitimate accusation.

4 votes plus 3 other players demanding an RC doesn't strike me as 'bits and pieces'

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Mafia 32 - No Fancy Title - Day 1 - 28/07/2013 06:46:40 PM 3304 Views
Present *NM* - 28/07/2013 07:52:29 PM 881 Views
Reporting in *NM* - 28/07/2013 09:50:47 PM 852 Views
Here. *NM* - 28/07/2013 10:42:26 PM 885 Views
Present! *NM* - 28/07/2013 11:03:03 PM 919 Views
I stand ready. *NM* - 29/07/2013 01:36:27 AM 885 Views
Helloooooo Players! *NM* - 29/07/2013 01:54:16 AM 867 Views
So, where to begin? *NM* - 29/07/2013 02:43:48 AM 882 Views
Use lube, this is my first time! *NM* - 29/07/2013 08:26:59 AM 857 Views
I loled *NM* - 29/07/2013 10:31:08 AM 897 Views
Just because of this comment I know he'll fit right in. - 01/08/2013 10:38:01 AM 1403 Views
Fox is being triggerhappy. *NM* - 01/08/2013 06:08:21 PM 877 Views
It's always fun on day 1! *NM* - 01/08/2013 06:37:26 PM 878 Views
RBIRL from Tuesday to Sunday - 29/07/2013 01:06:35 PM 1467 Views
I'm RBIRL from friday to sunday, myself - 29/07/2013 02:10:19 PM 1574 Views
RBIRL from Wednesday to Saturday. - 29/07/2013 02:18:47 PM 1469 Views
I'm joining the RBIRL train - 31/07/2013 01:50:55 PM 1454 Views
Present *NM* - 29/07/2013 02:53:40 PM 896 Views
apparently we got no fancy fantasy theme, but straight Mafia *NM* - 29/07/2013 03:18:18 PM 865 Views
I'm actually kinda glad. I think it was getting too...complicated for me. - 29/07/2013 03:48:33 PM 1492 Views
Agreed, but I would imagine Bergioyn might have some twists in store for us. - 29/07/2013 09:52:30 PM 1424 Views
Eh, Let's just go. IT WAS YOU THAT DID IT, WASN'T IT *NM* - 29/07/2013 10:56:49 PM 850 Views
It was you that done it, now own up! *NM* - 29/07/2013 11:41:40 PM 869 Views
Okay! I admit it! It was me! Oh wait... were you talking to or him? *NM* - 30/07/2013 02:31:30 AM 724 Views
Vote: Hobo - 30/07/2013 02:43:15 AM 1462 Views
Re: Vote: Hobo - 01/08/2013 12:27:15 AM 1470 Views
Re: Vote: Hobo - 01/08/2013 10:44:27 AM 1540 Views
I don't think it was - 01/08/2013 12:50:24 PM 1476 Views
If I remember correctly he had some dastatdly plot to catch the scum. - 01/08/2013 04:32:51 PM 1455 Views
He was very unclear on tha tpoint after the fact - 01/08/2013 11:27:00 PM 1535 Views
No, his plan was actually pretty good. - 06/08/2013 01:00:31 AM 1593 Views
How is that a good plan? - 06/08/2013 06:37:24 AM 1647 Views
Well, believe it or not, I swear it wasn't me this time. I blame s *NM* - 30/07/2013 02:07:38 PM 884 Views
it was probably Isaac but in the end he'll win the game *NM* - 30/07/2013 05:37:07 PM 867 Views
Rule #1: Isaac wins *NM* - 30/07/2013 06:18:38 PM 928 Views
Rules are made to be broken. *NM* - 30/07/2013 06:51:38 PM 887 Views
But is this rule able to be broken? *NM* - 30/07/2013 06:54:22 PM 867 Views
Sure. Last time he lost was game 29. *NM* - 30/07/2013 09:32:45 PM 844 Views
Surely you recall the Marvel[ous] Siege? You were mason buddy - 01/08/2013 12:14:47 AM 1472 Views
I vaguely remember the Marvel game, but not any specifics... *NM* - 04/08/2013 09:55:24 PM 860 Views
I do... - 05/08/2013 04:25:10 AM 1439 Views
Rule #2: Isaac is always suspected, but not lynched. *NM* - 30/07/2013 10:32:57 PM 880 Views
Isaac is like the German Soccer team in this. - 01/08/2013 10:45:39 AM 1345 Views
Re: Isaac is like the German Soccer team in this. - 01/08/2013 12:18:52 PM 1536 Views
(here) *NM* - 29/07/2013 11:03:26 PM 835 Views
Vote: Sacrilicious Toast - 30/07/2013 12:56:04 PM 1548 Views
Re: Vote: Sacrilicious Toast - 31/07/2013 09:19:11 AM 1577 Views
Re: Vote: Sacrilicious Toast - 01/08/2013 10:50:16 AM 1424 Views
Re: Vote: Sacrilicious Toast - 01/08/2013 12:11:33 AM 1436 Views
Activate! *NM* - 31/07/2013 03:03:50 AM 864 Views
Not too bad that you waited with the game, Berg - 01/08/2013 10:35:51 AM 1437 Views
Re: Not too bad that you waited with the game, Berg - 01/08/2013 11:06:23 AM 1443 Views
Okay, getting moving (Table) - 01/08/2013 11:45:30 PM 1557 Views
Yes, No, No. *NM* - 02/08/2013 02:32:52 AM 843 Views
Yes, No, No - 02/08/2013 08:54:12 AM 1481 Views
Re: Yes, No, No - 02/08/2013 09:50:24 AM 1418 Views
Yeah, my name's a real one too, just not logically related to anything in the game. *NM* - 02/08/2013 07:17:42 PM 846 Views
Same here. *NM* - 04/08/2013 09:54:10 PM 826 Views
Yes, No, No *NM* - 02/08/2013 01:03:24 PM 818 Views
Yes, no, no *NM* - 02/08/2013 08:26:52 PM 784 Views
yes, no, no *NM* - 03/08/2013 01:10:00 AM 852 Views
would be nice if one player answered Yes, Yes. Yes now: Lie = lynch *NM* - 03/08/2013 09:12:07 AM 822 Views
Well I'm reasonably sure some of them will either answer other then yes, no, no or lie - 03/08/2013 12:29:34 PM 1475 Views
Yes. No. No. - 04/08/2013 09:02:49 AM 1360 Views
Re: Yes. No. No. - 04/08/2013 11:19:03 AM 1435 Views
Yes, No, No *NM* - 03/08/2013 11:06:41 PM 850 Views
Yes, no, no. Also, I'm back. *NM* - 04/08/2013 09:52:11 PM 716 Views
Yes, no, no. Also, I'm back. *NM* - 04/08/2013 09:52:47 PM 813 Views
Dangit, I hate when I double post. *NM* - 04/08/2013 09:53:29 PM 865 Views
Yes, No No *NM* - 05/08/2013 03:28:03 AM 826 Views
Sorry I didn't have anything new to add... *NM* - 05/08/2013 03:29:28 AM 806 Views
Yes, No, No. *NM* - 06/08/2013 12:46:10 AM 794 Views
I might as well Unvote before I forget - 02/08/2013 03:32:43 PM 1397 Views
EBWOP - 02/08/2013 03:33:23 PM 1385 Views
Vote: Isaac - 03/08/2013 05:09:47 AM 1499 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac - 03/08/2013 07:32:48 AM 1412 Views
The "... and people die" part is probably accurate though *NM* - 03/08/2013 12:32:40 PM 827 Views
Correlation does not equal causation . *NM* - 03/08/2013 05:42:30 PM 852 Views
Precisely *NM* - 04/08/2013 11:22:52 AM 828 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac - 05/08/2013 08:31:03 PM 1494 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac - 06/08/2013 06:40:24 AM 1442 Views
Baaaack~ - 03/08/2013 11:26:57 PM 1445 Views
Although interesting, the questions don't seem to be adding much to the info - 05/08/2013 07:03:07 PM 1479 Views
Well - 05/08/2013 07:25:22 PM 1407 Views
That is correct - 05/08/2013 07:35:24 PM 1422 Views
Oh yeah, you're right - 05/08/2013 09:42:23 PM 1478 Views
Re: Oh yeah, you're right - 05/08/2013 10:09:48 PM 1482 Views
Re: Oh yeah, you're right - 05/08/2013 10:20:02 PM 1528 Views
I posted I was back.... NLRBIRL *NM* - 05/08/2013 10:25:58 PM 787 Views
Yeah, I missed that. Sorry *NM* - 06/08/2013 03:13:11 AM 835 Views
What's the NL for? RBIRL Real Busy in Real Life, NL=? - 06/08/2013 08:56:16 AM 1449 Views
Oh, duh, "No Longer" RBIRL *NM* - 06/08/2013 08:57:15 AM 805 Views
Yup *NM* - 06/08/2013 01:00:31 PM 850 Views
would be a very awkward abbreviation - 07/08/2013 10:05:17 AM 1397 Views
Re: Although interesting, the questions don't seem to be adding much to the info - 05/08/2013 08:26:01 PM 1554 Views
Agreed. Random lynches seem like a last resort to me. - 05/08/2013 08:55:59 PM 1474 Views
Now that you mention it, appearance might indeed be useful. - 06/08/2013 12:52:25 AM 1526 Views
Re: Now that you mention it, appearance might indeed be useful. - 06/08/2013 06:59:26 AM 1483 Views
Re: Now that you mention it, appearance might indeed be useful. - 06/08/2013 10:01:18 AM 1481 Views
Re: Now that you mention it, appearance might indeed be useful. - 06/08/2013 12:56:47 PM 1564 Views
I didn't have anything either. *NM* - 06/08/2013 01:02:46 PM 856 Views
No, I'm sorry, I don't - 06/08/2013 02:33:58 PM 1519 Views
No appearance was described in my role message. *NM* - 06/08/2013 08:45:51 PM 843 Views
Nope. *NM* - 07/08/2013 07:23:00 PM 840 Views
No, nothing on appearance *NM* - 07/08/2013 09:02:11 PM 848 Views
I think we may need to contemplate some semi-random options - 06/08/2013 07:55:25 AM 1447 Views
List of remarks by the 'accused', plus some remarks on them - 06/08/2013 08:51:15 AM 1637 Views
explanation - 06/08/2013 09:05:55 AM 1523 Views
Re: explanation - 06/08/2013 09:47:35 AM 1519 Views
Re: explanation - 06/08/2013 09:59:45 AM 1539 Views
Re: explanation - 06/08/2013 01:28:49 PM 1481 Views
I'm just surprised I'm not on the list. I was always a low poster... - 06/08/2013 10:00:22 AM 1499 Views
Re: I'm just surprised I'm not on the list. I was always a low poster... - 07/08/2013 07:48:34 PM 1429 Views
Your questions - 06/08/2013 02:59:16 PM 1533 Views
I apparently answered your questions backwards - 06/08/2013 03:06:06 PM 1433 Views
I would look at it a bit differently, even if the outcome doesn't change that much - 06/08/2013 03:55:12 PM 1520 Views
Well, I'm impressed - 06/08/2013 04:11:31 PM 1446 Views
I thank you for the compliment. - 06/08/2013 09:51:54 PM 1492 Views
Re: I thank you for the compliment. - 07/08/2013 01:53:25 AM 1457 Views
Those are fair points - 07/08/2013 11:08:21 AM 1465 Views
Re: Those are fair points - 07/08/2013 01:01:55 PM 1484 Views
Oh dear, this is unfortunate. - 07/08/2013 09:46:26 PM 1511 Views
I think you just killed Beetnemesis *NM* - 07/08/2013 10:56:16 PM 828 Views
Better him than me . *NM* - 07/08/2013 11:16:29 PM 825 Views
Re: Oh dear, this is unfortunate. - 07/08/2013 11:32:12 PM 1435 Views
nice analysis - 07/08/2013 10:25:20 AM 1389 Views
Like I said before, Tables=Death - 06/08/2013 07:20:07 PM 1479 Views
Re: Like I said before, Tables=Death - 06/08/2013 08:22:47 PM 1400 Views
Beware of BAMF! (Out of town till Saturday) - 07/08/2013 03:37:36 PM 1407 Views
Re: Beware of BAMF! (Out of town till Saturday) - 07/08/2013 04:11:04 PM 1450 Views
Re: Beware of BAMF! (Out of town till Saturday) - 07/08/2013 04:43:12 PM 1459 Views
Re: Beware of BAMF! (Out of town till Saturday) - 07/08/2013 05:34:04 PM 1477 Views
He really is... - 07/08/2013 04:55:59 PM 1453 Views
Re: He really is... - 07/08/2013 08:36:44 PM 1497 Views
Hm, that's not quite what I was thinking when I said that - 08/08/2013 08:49:11 PM 1382 Views
BAMF? - 07/08/2013 06:31:59 PM 1421 Views
It's the onomatopoeia nightcrawler makes when he teleports - 07/08/2013 06:38:24 PM 1463 Views
Re: It's the onomatopoeia nightcrawler makes when he teleports - 07/08/2013 06:42:30 PM 1522 Views
Re: It's the onomatopoeia nightcrawler makes when he teleports - 07/08/2013 06:45:49 PM 1501 Views
When it comes to Marvel, it's Spidey and Deadpool all the way! X-Men. Pffft. - 07/08/2013 10:38:41 PM 1409 Views
Dr Doom was always my favorite hero in Marvel, but Deadpool is pretty cool *NM* - 07/08/2013 10:52:39 PM 797 Views
Dr Doom has cool costume, but other than that I don't know much about him. - 07/08/2013 11:37:09 PM 1417 Views
He's Marvel's Lex Luthor, only much cooler - 07/08/2013 11:48:00 PM 1384 Views
I'd actually say he's a bit more like Marvel's Superman than Marvel's Lex Luthor. - 07/08/2013 11:54:14 PM 1513 Views
I'm not a Marvel fan, but Doom is amazing. - 07/08/2013 11:52:09 PM 1413 Views
OK, here I am! Some layout analysis: - 07/08/2013 04:49:33 PM 1465 Views
Re: OK, here I am! Some layout analysis: - 07/08/2013 05:44:09 PM 1515 Views
Well, you obviously know something, so out with it - 07/08/2013 06:33:04 PM 1446 Views
With that in mind... sounds like I hit too close to home, and you got sensitive - 08/08/2013 03:10:50 AM 1480 Views
Vote: Beetnemesis, Are you accusing me of being scum for pointing out your post had no substance? - 08/08/2013 03:39:25 AM 1542 Views
Re: - 08/08/2013 06:30:26 AM 1424 Views
Granted, as you yourself pointed out: attack is the best defense - 08/08/2013 08:17:31 AM 1377 Views
How often do we even have SKs? *NM* - 08/08/2013 09:39:58 AM 905 Views
This pushes it over the edge for me too. - 08/08/2013 01:13:21 PM 1427 Views
Hah. You got prickly pretty quickly. - 08/08/2013 07:39:24 PM 1430 Views
Prickly? I'm not touchy about it just suspiscious - 08/08/2013 08:01:39 PM 1412 Views
Re: OK, here I am! Some layout analysis: - 07/08/2013 06:38:45 PM 1435 Views
My feeling is that a "normal" game is pretty easy to balance - 08/08/2013 03:08:09 AM 1409 Views
re - 07/08/2013 08:36:15 PM 1437 Views
Isn't it at the very least Roleclaim time? - 08/08/2013 04:31:26 PM 1459 Views
Re: Isn't it at the very least Roleclaim time? - 08/08/2013 05:44:54 PM 1433 Views
Re: Isn't it at the very least Roleclaim time? - 08/08/2013 07:51:09 PM 1485 Views
Re: Isn't it at the very least Roleclaim time? - 08/08/2013 08:02:45 PM 1444 Views
Re: Isn't it at the very least Roleclaim time? - 08/08/2013 08:05:52 PM 1571 Views
The thing we want to avoid is MASS roleclaim - 09/08/2013 08:30:32 AM 1376 Views
Okay, almost totally off topic but... - 07/08/2013 11:40:54 PM 1367 Views
The problem with that - 08/08/2013 08:09:56 AM 1440 Views
Re: The problem with that - 08/08/2013 05:02:56 PM 1419 Views
Reminds me of the Cairhien game a bit. - 08/08/2013 06:14:17 PM 1395 Views
That remains one of my favorites - 08/08/2013 07:48:42 PM 1432 Views
I haaaated the Cairhien game - 08/08/2013 08:16:57 PM 1452 Views
Re: That remains one of my favorites - 08/08/2013 09:42:25 PM 1403 Views
Does anyone else have any opinions? - 08/08/2013 05:51:23 PM 1399 Views
My take: - 08/08/2013 08:00:13 PM 1582 Views
Did you just admit to being a scummer? - 08/08/2013 08:04:21 PM 1467 Views
Hah, remember when I mentioned grasping at straws? - 08/08/2013 09:31:35 PM 1416 Views
We have always used the term that way, always, that and only that back to game 2 - 08/08/2013 09:44:20 PM 1469 Views
Holy crap, 4 years ago. - 09/08/2013 02:09:09 AM 1325 Views
That's when you asked and were told by the Moderator, it has come up since then many times - 09/08/2013 04:10:28 AM 1408 Views
I can't be the only person laughing at you right now - 09/08/2013 05:44:03 PM 1414 Views
I doubt anyone is laughing including yourself - 09/08/2013 06:08:41 PM 1390 Views
No, he's correct. - 08/08/2013 09:53:43 PM 1530 Views
Re: My take: - 08/08/2013 08:12:46 PM 1510 Views
To be a student of Isaac is a subtle thing - 08/08/2013 09:30:02 PM 1369 Views
sure - 08/08/2013 08:44:06 PM 1413 Views
Hmm, my thoughts, - 08/08/2013 08:56:27 PM 1511 Views
Re: Does anyone else have any opinions? - 08/08/2013 10:30:22 PM 1451 Views
Re: Does anyone else have any opinions? - 08/08/2013 11:18:56 PM 1497 Views
"Post count" usually acts as a tiebreaker - 09/08/2013 02:12:28 AM 1464 Views
I disagree - 09/08/2013 09:00:33 AM 1391 Views
Re: I disagree - 09/08/2013 11:25:29 AM 1373 Views
Several people have called for a roleclaim from beet - 09/08/2013 09:06:28 AM 1409 Views
I feel like I'm missing something really obvious here... - 09/08/2013 09:16:51 AM 1414 Views
Re: I feel like I'm missing something really obvious here... - 09/08/2013 03:18:38 PM 1476 Views
No, I meant entrails. - 09/08/2013 03:49:21 PM 1379 Views
Re: No, I meant entrails. - 09/08/2013 04:05:31 PM 1424 Views
Ah. Well that definitely explains it. *NM* - 09/08/2013 04:49:55 PM 816 Views
That's awesome. *NM* - 09/08/2013 09:21:59 PM 806 Views
Re: Does anyone else have any opinions? - 09/08/2013 11:48:13 AM 1372 Views
I'll point out that SKs were one of a few options I hypothesized - 09/08/2013 05:47:23 PM 1439 Views
Re: I'll point out that SKs were one of a few options I hypothesized - 09/08/2013 07:10:44 PM 1304 Views
OK, so the smiley was a typo - 09/08/2013 07:26:58 PM 1441 Views
I do, but - 09/08/2013 03:39:28 PM 1414 Views
RBIRL - 09/08/2013 05:50:21 AM 1424 Views
The case on Beetnemesis - 09/08/2013 05:05:32 PM 1533 Views
Ah good, time for a point-by-point rebuttal - 09/08/2013 06:04:11 PM 1443 Views
EBWOP: A final point - 09/08/2013 06:14:25 PM 1501 Views
Actually... - 09/08/2013 06:38:26 PM 1453 Views
I can't see any difference with Isaac's "aggressiveness". *NM* - 09/08/2013 07:31:28 PM 888 Views
Re: EBWOP: A final point - 09/08/2013 07:55:19 PM 1521 Views
Yet you still refuse to roleclaim, are you suicidal? - 09/08/2013 07:04:40 PM 1492 Views
Shrug, I have nothing against roleclaiming. Roleclaim: Tracker - 09/08/2013 07:33:40 PM 1436 Views
Correct me if wrong... - 09/08/2013 08:39:58 PM 1461 Views
Exactly! - 09/08/2013 11:06:25 PM 1481 Views
Wow, I'm gone for 24 hours, - 11/08/2013 12:02:38 AM 1441 Views
No, you just did everything you could to avoid it, like claiming almost no one had asked... - 09/08/2013 08:42:10 PM 1538 Views
I think you're right. - 09/08/2013 11:47:32 PM 1673 Views
Re: Yet you still refuse to roleclaim, are you suicidal? - 09/08/2013 07:49:12 PM 1438 Views
Re: Yet you still refuse to roleclaim, are you suicidal? - 09/08/2013 08:04:42 PM 1502 Views
too much mud - 09/08/2013 09:50:35 PM 1521 Views
Vote: Beetnemesis - 11/08/2013 10:32:51 AM 1603 Views
@ Mod, Vote Check - 11/08/2013 04:46:16 PM 1441 Views
That's a valid vote, I had missed it. Twilight pending. - 11/08/2013 05:36:13 PM 1408 Views
Actually, so did I. Did I hammer? - 11/08/2013 05:55:14 PM 1391 Views
Yes. *NM* - 11/08/2013 05:59:47 PM 709 Views
beetnemesis has been lynched. - 11/08/2013 05:52:43 PM 1494 Views

Reply to Message