Active Users:754 Time:14/12/2025 01:51:02 PM
Regarding River Song... Liam Send a noteboard - 26/04/2010 05:36:30 PM
That was good. It is pretty much what I have been waiting for from Moffat. Of course, I hate him deeply for making it a two-parter and leaving me in agonising fear of angels and statues and basically blinking for a whole week. But I liked it.

I was not as enthusiastic about Alex Kingston this time (compared to Silence in the Library). She seems to have only one setting. I would have liked her to be somewhat subtler. But I may be wrong. I AM glad River Song is finally reintroduced. And I like how Moffat put two of his major creations together (ie scary as hell Angels and Doctor's mystery future something-or-other).

I wonder what it is she has done, which the priest does not think the Doctor would like to hear. Has she killed someone?

Thoughts?


I decided to watch the Library two-parter last night, and agree with you on how much better she was in those episodes. That said, I wouldn't be surprised if they were trying to make her out to be younger and more impulsive than the professor she grows into...but over-egged it a little.

In any event, I think this was probably my favourite episode so far, certainly better than last week's Dalek one, and Amy continues to stand head-and-shoulders above any of the other recent companions.

Also of note: I thought the pictures of him in her diary explained your concerns over the regeneration issues. She evidently only met Ten once, and likely recognised him from said images, but for all she, at first, knew he could have been Twelve or Eighteen or whatever. (I assume we're doing away with the regeneration number limit these days. I'm also assuming said diary isn't the most organised when it comes to labelling faces in order. But then, could you imagine The Doctor taking the time to make sure it's all correct?)

I think I'm jabbering about nothing now.
---

Oh, how simply grand it is to be travelling by dirigible again. Direct us to the west good sir, tonight we will remember what it is to live.
Reply to message
/Doctor Who: Time of Angels *spoilers* - 24/04/2010 07:53:37 PM 892 Views
Amy is growing on me. - 24/04/2010 08:19:43 PM 767 Views
Re: Amy is growing on me. - 24/04/2010 08:21:44 PM 760 Views
She seems as if she believes everything she says to be highly witty. - 24/04/2010 08:23:51 PM 737 Views
Started well, ended badly - 24/04/2010 08:21:14 PM 674 Views
Re: Started well, ended badly - 24/04/2010 08:22:50 PM 716 Views
I liked that one. - 25/04/2010 03:26:26 AM 773 Views
Re: I liked that one. - 25/04/2010 10:04:05 AM 780 Views
Re: /Doctor Who: Time of Angels *spoilers* - 25/04/2010 03:31:03 PM 729 Views
Re: /Doctor Who: Time of Angels *spoilers* - 25/04/2010 03:35:59 PM 695 Views
That episode was well terrifying. - 25/04/2010 11:44:35 PM 956 Views
Re: That episode was well terrifying. - 26/04/2010 09:13:45 AM 721 Views
I'm a much happier bunny this week - 26/04/2010 10:12:55 AM 807 Views
Re: I'm a much happier bunny this week - 26/04/2010 10:19:21 AM 804 Views
Well, that answered the question about what the Doctor was shooting. - 26/04/2010 11:20:01 AM 696 Views
True. And satisfactorily. - 26/04/2010 05:19:12 PM 779 Views
And roughly as I suggested - 26/04/2010 05:24:41 PM 662 Views
Re: And roughly as I suggested - 26/04/2010 05:27:07 PM 691 Views
It was good. - 26/04/2010 01:48:27 PM 674 Views
Re: It was good. - 26/04/2010 05:19:50 PM 633 Views
Regarding River Song... - 26/04/2010 05:36:30 PM 839 Views
Re: Regarding River Song... - 26/04/2010 05:41:51 PM 689 Views
Re: Regarding River Song... - 26/04/2010 05:51:24 PM 797 Views
Re: Regarding River Song... - 26/04/2010 05:55:29 PM 715 Views
Just caught it online. - 30/04/2010 04:18:52 AM 620 Views
Re: Just caught it online. - 30/04/2010 08:04:24 AM 718 Views

Reply to Message