Active Users:431 Time:17/09/2025 10:06:03 PM
Re: Jack wouldn't have been on the plane. DomA Send a noteboard - 05/05/2010 06:51:48 PM
People also complain that this episode title was misleading, and only had to do with Sideways-Locke's surgery. I disagree, and think Jack's insistence to "Just trust me" proved that he's the one. I think Sawyer disqualified himself with the bomb, etc, and Sayid's comment to Jack further supports that.


Agreed. The foreshadowing that Jack is the one was heavy and suggests the title indeed had a double meaning.

Desmond will probably be the one to flip whatever EMP switch is necessary to kill Smokey, but Jack is looking like Jacob's replacement.


I don't think this is heading for any killing of Smokey. There wouldn't be any point to Jack replacing Jacob if the Evil the island protects the world from isn't there anymore.

This rather looks like this is gonna end with Jack and the evil- in-Locke's-shape as the new guardian/prisoner.

IMO, Desmond is perhaps needed to fix up "reality" and make the chaotic sideway universe(s?) end. Or maybe he'll be involved in how Jack gains Jacob's powers. He can apparently withstand a fair amount of Smokey's chaotic power and survive, so maybe he'll be used as some sort of shield to keep Locke in while Jack becomes the new Jacob. Widmore spoke of a sacrifice for Desmond, in any way - but it's still unclear what Widmore's goal is, and if he hates Ben but is still a follower of Jacob for all that. It sounds to me like Ben and Widmore both think/thought they were the candidate. Ben is disabused, but his foe may not be, or perhaps Widmore has always been trying to stop Ben, who unlike Smokey can kill the real candidates. Widmore knows Kate isn't on the list anymore, we can now say as much.

I wonder if they'll give us a peek at future visitors to the Island to close the circle?

This message last edited by DomA on 05/05/2010 at 07:01:18 PM
Reply to message
Lost 6.14: The candidate *spoilers* - 05/05/2010 09:01:43 AM 1141 Views
Summary of "Across the sea" sneak peak - 05/05/2010 10:30:45 AM 693 Views
Re: Summary of "Across the sea" sneak peak - 05/05/2010 06:28:55 PM 786 Views
Re: Summary of "Across the sea" sneak peak - 05/05/2010 07:55:33 PM 735 Views
Re: Summary of "Across the sea" sneak peak - 07/05/2010 04:24:20 PM 851 Views
Where ARE Ben & co, anyway? - 08/05/2010 12:28:43 PM 616 Views
Re: Where ARE Ben & co, anyway? - 10/05/2010 04:28:55 AM 617 Views
I found that preview on Youtube - 06/05/2010 05:43:14 AM 923 Views
Oh wow! - 06/05/2010 08:55:15 AM 681 Views
Terrific episode! - 05/05/2010 04:11:06 PM 742 Views
Jack wouldn't have been on the plane. - 05/05/2010 05:58:54 PM 675 Views
Re: Jack wouldn't have been on the plane. - 05/05/2010 06:51:48 PM 705 Views
dude... - 05/05/2010 06:22:06 PM 660 Views
Re: Terrific episode! - 05/05/2010 07:51:01 PM 746 Views
I thought Locke planted the bomb on the plane. - 06/05/2010 05:45:52 AM 639 Views
It is supicous that he ripped the watch off of the guards body before entering the plane *NM* - 06/05/2010 10:21:15 AM 283 Views
True - 06/05/2010 10:50:52 AM 624 Views
I am so emo about the loss of Sun & Jin... - 05/05/2010 05:25:38 PM 685 Views
me too. - 05/05/2010 06:19:56 PM 690 Views
I am not handling this business of - 05/05/2010 08:20:46 PM 795 Views
aww, there, there - 05/05/2010 09:02:35 PM 732 Views
Re: I am not handling this business of - 06/05/2010 03:23:32 AM 662 Views
lol oh that star! *NM* - 06/05/2010 08:51:45 AM 267 Views
No. Way. Just, no way. - 06/05/2010 03:11:22 AM 696 Views
Frank - 06/05/2010 09:12:20 AM 654 Views
I am glad the show is ending and Jack is not the next Jacob IMHO. - 06/05/2010 03:58:21 AM 609 Views
I was thinking the same thing. *NM* - 06/05/2010 03:07:42 PM 286 Views
A few things i noticed. - 06/05/2010 05:31:06 AM 699 Views
Re: A few things i noticed. - 06/05/2010 09:15:02 AM 652 Views
Re: A few things i noticed. - 06/05/2010 05:13:21 PM 671 Views
You're laying this one on SAWYER? Jack & Jin were the episode's jerks. - 06/05/2010 02:31:37 PM 679 Views
Jerks? Um, no. Fools, yes. - 07/05/2010 03:20:00 AM 711 Views
Re: Jerks? Um, no. Fools, yes. - 07/05/2010 02:28:07 PM 751 Views
Re: Jerks? Um, no. Fools, yes. - 08/05/2010 12:19:32 PM 718 Views
Re: Agreed! - 08/05/2010 02:30:15 AM 678 Views
The "mysterious music box" explained - 07/05/2010 01:00:45 PM 738 Views
... my crackpot theory is ... - 08/05/2010 08:19:02 AM 630 Views

Reply to Message