Active Users:655 Time:02/02/2026 10:18:28 AM
Its not as simple as that, if you know what happened to it. mick Send a noteboard - 12/05/2010 05:46:18 AM

Not showing the 2 hour premier which explained everything first, not staying in the same schedule, not knowing how to advertise to show in the first place meant that most people never got the chance to see it. some of those who did catch it couldn't find it the next week.

One thing that is true is that if it wasn't for Firefly failing and the response it got then Chuck would have not gotten its next series.

Reply to message
I just finished Firefly, and I have to say... - 11/05/2010 10:06:15 PM 1028 Views
I know! - 11/05/2010 10:12:22 PM 669 Views
I've seen Serenity 3 times - 11/05/2010 10:14:50 PM 693 Views
Re: I've seen Serenity 3 times - 11/05/2010 10:16:06 PM 661 Views
Re: I've seen Serenity 3 times - 11/05/2010 10:18:37 PM 683 Views
The only Whedon programme I've ever liked. - 11/05/2010 10:36:32 PM 684 Views
Same *NM* - 12/05/2010 10:22:44 AM 265 Views
word. - 11/05/2010 10:53:30 PM 681 Views
Because not enough people watched it. It wasn't popular. The end. *NM* - 11/05/2010 10:54:34 PM 270 Views
Its not as simple as that, if you know what happened to it. - 12/05/2010 05:46:18 AM 729 Views
I never even heard of it until after it was cancled - 12/05/2010 07:58:49 PM 668 Views
As Wibble said... - 12/05/2010 12:43:49 AM 684 Views
Sounds like you didn't watch it when it aired. - 12/05/2010 02:52:32 AM 666 Views
Maybe it was for the best. - 12/05/2010 04:02:48 AM 717 Views
That's true, though *NM* - 12/05/2010 10:24:46 AM 269 Views
If firefly continued then we wouldnt have Castle *NM* - 12/05/2010 04:57:21 AM 275 Views
Not true. - 12/05/2010 03:44:19 PM 638 Views
ok...i see...well im sorry you folks didnt get more firefly..i have never seen it so whatever.... *NM* - 13/05/2010 09:14:32 PM 251 Views
You should - 13/05/2010 09:43:28 PM 657 Views
Castle is basically Mal (although Mal's a bit less... um...) - 13/05/2010 11:24:00 PM 673 Views
Re: Castle is basically Mal (although Mal's a bit less... um...) - 13/05/2010 11:25:20 PM 654 Views
Re: Um, no. Mal and Castle are both basically Nathan Fillion, - 13/05/2010 11:47:51 PM 660 Views
Re: Um, no. Mal and Castle are both basically Nathan Fillion, - 13/05/2010 11:50:28 PM 623 Views
Re: Good wordbuilding, funny dialogue and acting do not an original plot make. - 12/05/2010 08:17:37 PM 705 Views
Re: Good wordbuilding, funny dialogue and acting do not an original plot make. - 13/05/2010 09:45:02 PM 651 Views
Re: It was wrong when Xander and Cordy did it too. - 13/05/2010 10:21:35 PM 705 Views
Re: It was wrong when Xander and Cordy did it too. - 13/05/2010 10:24:42 PM 691 Views
Really? I'd always thought they had an odd sexual tension about them. - 14/05/2010 12:15:57 AM 674 Views

Reply to Message