Active Users:445 Time:13/05/2025 10:11:09 PM
Re: Speaking of protecting the candidates. Or not. TaskmasterJack Send a noteboard - 28/05/2010 11:30:30 PM
But she is seriously botching her job of protecting the candidates if that was her. Unless it was one of those "Hey, one of our outriggers are missing! There it is out there! I can't tell who it is using it but let's shoot at them."

Having just watched this episode last weekend:
In early season 1 most main characters were candidates, presumably. Charlie's name was in the cave later. Why did Ethan and the Others think it was a good idea to HANG HIM so they could get preggers Claire. Jacob, I am looking at you!


I don't think Jacob actually told the Others anything. Ben seemed to be faking orders from Jacob most of the time just to hold onto his leadership role. I think Jacob just let things play out on their own. Ilana seems to have been the only one told who the candidates might be.
Reply to message
Lost: The Outrigger Canoe gunfight *spoilers* - 28/05/2010 12:17:34 AM 577 Views
I too assumed it was Ilana's people at the time. - 28/05/2010 12:26:20 AM 260 Views
Speaking of protecting the candidates. Or not. - 28/05/2010 08:14:50 AM 266 Views
Re: Speaking of protecting the candidates. Or not. - 28/05/2010 11:30:30 PM 283 Views
Yes remember early in season 3, when Pickett wanted to kill them "He's not even on Jacob's list" - 29/05/2010 03:38:24 AM 278 Views
Not the same list - 29/05/2010 10:49:22 PM 324 Views
Yeah true, that makes sense *NM* - 29/05/2010 11:00:19 AM 108 Views
The Frenchmen--not sure the timing works - 28/05/2010 02:31:43 AM 284 Views
I'm trying to remember the exact sequence... - 28/05/2010 03:24:39 AM 269 Views

Reply to Message