Active Users:624 Time:03/08/2025 11:04:44 PM
Purefoy was fantastic in his role. Legolas Send a noteboard - 20/06/2010 10:42:56 AM
From all of the history I've studied this past year, and all of the historical fiction I've read as well, I cannot accept a physically pretty woman as being Cleo. I liked some of Marshal's performance of that shows version of Cleopatra, but then, the character she played was NOT Cleopatra, just as almost none of the major characters from the show were really anything like they were portrayed. Well, there is one major exception: I thought that David Bamber was perfect as Cicero; from the moment I saw him on screen the first time I watched the show, I suspected that would be Cicero, and then he opened his mouth and started speaking. Oh that voice! I knew right then, before any character even referred to him as Cicero, who he was playing. I also thought that Max Pirkis as the younger Octavian was a great choice (he even sort of looked like Octavian). The only other historical figure on the show that I liked the casting for was Marc Antony; Purefoy (despite not looking the part to me, being way smaller than I figured Antony would be) played the part perfectly I thought.

I thought Marshal worked, though - okay, she's pretty, they weren't going to get an actress that really wasn't good-looking to play Cleopatra, but her prettiness is unconventional and boyish enough to get the point across, I thought. Certainly a better fit looks-wise than either Liz Taylor or Angelina Jolie.
I really did enjoy "Rome" just as long as I ignored the inaccuracies that are all over the place.

Yeah, of course - the timeline is all shot to hell, and there were bound to be other inaccuracies too. Gotta give the show credit for showing a grittier, less exalted and more credible Rome, though.
Reply to message
*Incoherent sputters of historian rage* Angelina Jolie Incorrectly Cast In New Cleopatra Role - 11/06/2010 02:35:15 AM 935 Views
I nominate Tyra Banks. - 11/06/2010 06:29:44 AM 541 Views
I love Angelina jolie - 11/06/2010 06:36:48 AM 627 Views
The only reason for an "Africanish" queen... - 11/06/2010 04:09:14 PM 611 Views
why? Cleopatra was not African. *NM* - 15/06/2010 10:19:11 AM 226 Views
They should get Lyndsey Marshal back, she was awesome. And looked the part. - 11/06/2010 12:45:48 PM 571 Views
The one from Rome? *NM* - 11/06/2010 02:18:48 PM 205 Views
Yes. *NM* - 11/06/2010 02:36:20 PM 190 Views
Angelina is HOT, Cleopatra was NOT - 16/06/2010 10:42:42 PM 506 Views
I'm having a hard time telling if you agree with me about Marshal or not... *NM* - 16/06/2010 11:29:02 PM 204 Views
she was too pretty in my opinion - 20/06/2010 03:59:57 AM 487 Views
Purefoy was fantastic in his role. - 20/06/2010 10:42:56 AM 511 Views
Wait...is the racist part the idiocy of trying to say Cleopatra was black or the "wog" calling part? - 15/06/2010 01:38:42 AM 554 Views
it's not even a proper use of the term wog. - 15/06/2010 10:16:25 AM 523 Views
No, actually it is. - 15/06/2010 05:06:54 PM 603 Views
Perhaps you've confused "wog" and "wop". *NM* - 15/06/2010 05:07:22 PM 204 Views
no, see above. - 16/06/2010 08:54:27 AM 450 Views
Wouldn't the closest modern ethnicity to the ancient egyptians be the Coptics? *NM* - 16/06/2010 10:44:39 PM 193 Views
Well, yes, or the non-Coptic Egyptians. - 17/06/2010 12:57:54 AM 511 Views
Yah...i don't see why people ever think Cleopatra should be black. - 15/06/2010 10:18:12 AM 498 Views

Reply to Message