... as a big budget Hollywood film with a Hollywood actor, then I want it to have nothing to do with the show's continuity. I don't want them regenerating a new Doctor just for a two hour movie, and then regenerate another new Doctor. I dislike the revolving Doctor door we have going lately.
Revolving Doctor door? Tennant stayed for ages.
Four years is ages? One of those four wasn't even an actual season ...
Looking at the history of the show though, I guess four years is about the average, with Baker being the only one to stay for much more (six or seven years it looks like).
Still, it feels like they should stay on longer. A Doctor regeneration feels like it should be a big event, not something they do twice in the space of two hours for the sake of a movie.
Warder to starry_nite
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Who what?
30/06/2010 09:12:20 PM
- 525 Views
There's only one way I could see it.
01/07/2010 01:44:10 AM
- 295 Views
I have the opposite reaction
01/07/2010 09:37:47 AM
- 373 Views
But if it's Davies doing it ...
01/07/2010 04:47:03 PM
- 320 Views
Re: But if it's Davies doing it ...
01/07/2010 06:15:48 PM
- 336 Views
Re: But if it's Davies doing it ...
02/07/2010 01:43:50 AM
- 383 Views
I'll probably ignore it, like I have with the Sherlock Holmes thing recently *NM*
01/07/2010 10:55:12 AM
- 139 Views