Active Users:357 Time:04/07/2025 01:49:52 AM
Re: No. No. Palatine Send a noteboard - 29/08/2010 06:23:34 PM
See, Russel Brand can do sloshed Brit. In fact. I believe that is his natural state. But. He cannot do endearing. The only reason why Arthur worked (well, apart from Liza Minelli being easy on the eyes and John Gielgud being wonderful, was that despite Arthur being wrong in every way, Dudley Moore was sweet. If Arthur is not sweet, the film cannot work. Because then his only good quality will be his money. And that would be tragic.


Maybe he can. His look has typecast him. Give him a chance.

Liza Minelli easy on the eyes?! Her mother was good-looking, but she's never been.

Gielgud was wonderful in that movie.

Or maybe this remake is supposed to be tragic.
*MySmiley*

I play air tambourine. Competitively.
Reply to message
This makes me want to cry - 29/08/2010 08:48:41 AM 790 Views
That man just has to disappear *NM* - 29/08/2010 11:05:41 AM 166 Views
yes - 29/08/2010 11:46:46 AM 387 Views
give me a vodka bottle, string, a butler and a bazooka and i'll make him disappear - 30/08/2010 12:38:44 AM 459 Views
that sounds promising. *NM* - 30/08/2010 12:40:42 AM 167 Views
Oddly enough, I can see him in that role. - 29/08/2010 02:20:33 PM 343 Views
No - 29/08/2010 02:25:12 PM 375 Views
Re: No. No. - 29/08/2010 06:23:34 PM 444 Views
I never saw this movie - 30/08/2010 09:13:43 AM 371 Views

Reply to Message