Active Users:1130 Time:23/06/2026 07:54:56 AM
Re: Indeed. Legolas Send a noteboard - 08/09/2010 11:49:49 PM
True. I suppose not actually having visited the afterlife makes a bit of a difference. Which brings up the question of how dead she was. Clearly dead enough to cause a new Slayer to be created, but not dead enough for Heaven? Or Heaven in Buffy is an alternate dimension, simply, not an afterlife. Hmmm.

Well, it's not as if any human returned from theoretical death by CPR has ever been able to describe more than that big tunnel, either, so fair enough I'd say. It can take a bit more than a few minutes to reach the afterlife, makes sense.
Yes. I agree.

Huh. For some reason - I'm really not sure why - I had you pegged as someone liking Giles very much in general. Oh, it might have to do with your worship of Lupin, come to think of it.
But we know kiss of life is not a magic kiss of life, it is restarting the lungs. Buffy is not far enough gone into fantasy land for it to be anything else. Drawing on myths is one thing, I cannot help feeling that this is something else.

I don't know about magic, but most people would view it as more than a purely mechanical thing, alright. And really, I think my point is sound - just because being entirely consistent about the breathing thing is not feasible, doesn't mean they should give up entirely on claiming that vampires don't breathe.
Angel uses his lack of breath as a strength in the very first season of Buffy as well, when Giles, Xander and Willow are trapped in the room with the gas (the episode with the invisible girl).

Ah yes, now that you mention it. I also just thought of the part where he spends two months at the bottom of the ocean. Kind of a big one, there. :P
Reply to message
There is one thing that really, really annoys me. - 08/09/2010 09:26:23 PM 1105 Views
Don't watch vampire programmes? - 08/09/2010 09:42:33 PM 835 Views
But ... I have to. - 08/09/2010 09:45:51 PM 804 Views
Because TV shows about vampires are usually not concerned about science? *NM* - 08/09/2010 10:07:53 PM 330 Views
But why? - 08/09/2010 10:09:33 PM 739 Views
Combination of both, probably. - 08/09/2010 10:25:01 PM 781 Views
"I may be dead, but I'm still pretty!" - 08/09/2010 10:18:43 PM 852 Views
Indeed. - 08/09/2010 10:20:58 PM 848 Views
Re: Indeed. - 08/09/2010 10:30:32 PM 798 Views
Re: Indeed. - 08/09/2010 10:36:19 PM 835 Views
Re: Indeed. - 08/09/2010 10:49:55 PM 846 Views
Re: Indeed. - 08/09/2010 10:57:01 PM 908 Views
Re: Indeed. - 08/09/2010 11:49:49 PM 797 Views
Re: Indeed. - 09/09/2010 08:52:43 AM 874 Views
Also - 08/09/2010 10:46:35 PM 738 Views
Yes. - 08/09/2010 10:51:31 PM 699 Views
Re: Yes. - 08/09/2010 10:57:34 PM 748 Views
She's mostly okay when she's actually herself. - 08/09/2010 11:10:33 PM 774 Views
Re: She's mostly okay when she's actually herself. - 08/09/2010 11:13:59 PM 804 Views
I so agree. - 08/09/2010 11:44:21 PM 793 Views
Re: I so agree. - 09/09/2010 08:45:35 AM 811 Views
Re: I so agree. - 09/09/2010 09:55:34 AM 711 Views
Pft - 08/09/2010 10:39:47 PM 831 Views
- 08/09/2010 10:40:52 PM 783 Views
Ah. - 08/09/2010 11:18:08 PM 792 Views
The lack of body heat is another trait I find annoying. - 09/09/2010 12:12:15 AM 822 Views
Re: The lack of body heat is another trait I find annoying. - 09/09/2010 08:55:21 AM 806 Views
Re: The lack of body heat is another trait I find annoying. - 09/09/2010 11:33:41 PM 757 Views
Re: The lack of body heat is another trait I find annoying. - 09/09/2010 02:21:54 PM 979 Views
Re: The lack of body heat is another trait I find annoying. - 09/09/2010 11:35:15 PM 820 Views
Oh, Robert. For whom the cock throbs? It throbs for thee. - 10/09/2010 02:31:16 AM 834 Views
Re: Oh, Robert. For whom the cock throbs? It throbs for thee. - 10/09/2010 03:10:14 AM 1030 Views
- 10/09/2010 04:48:14 AM 952 Views
TV and the movies tend to treat scfi and fantasy like this all the time - 09/09/2010 06:30:42 PM 734 Views
Thankfully I have yet to see Avatar. *NM* - 09/09/2010 06:32:46 PM 372 Views
it is pretty - 09/09/2010 09:44:41 PM 727 Views
And... - 09/09/2010 09:37:04 PM 774 Views
Re: And... - 10/09/2010 12:54:52 AM 694 Views

Reply to Message