Active Users:1273 Time:24/10/2025 05:20:19 PM
Re: Indeed. Legolas Send a noteboard - 08/09/2010 11:49:49 PM
True. I suppose not actually having visited the afterlife makes a bit of a difference. Which brings up the question of how dead she was. Clearly dead enough to cause a new Slayer to be created, but not dead enough for Heaven? Or Heaven in Buffy is an alternate dimension, simply, not an afterlife. Hmmm.

Well, it's not as if any human returned from theoretical death by CPR has ever been able to describe more than that big tunnel, either, so fair enough I'd say. It can take a bit more than a few minutes to reach the afterlife, makes sense.
Yes. I agree.

Huh. For some reason - I'm really not sure why - I had you pegged as someone liking Giles very much in general. Oh, it might have to do with your worship of Lupin, come to think of it.
But we know kiss of life is not a magic kiss of life, it is restarting the lungs. Buffy is not far enough gone into fantasy land for it to be anything else. Drawing on myths is one thing, I cannot help feeling that this is something else.

I don't know about magic, but most people would view it as more than a purely mechanical thing, alright. And really, I think my point is sound - just because being entirely consistent about the breathing thing is not feasible, doesn't mean they should give up entirely on claiming that vampires don't breathe.
Angel uses his lack of breath as a strength in the very first season of Buffy as well, when Giles, Xander and Willow are trapped in the room with the gas (the episode with the invisible girl).

Ah yes, now that you mention it. I also just thought of the part where he spends two months at the bottom of the ocean. Kind of a big one, there. :P
Reply to message
There is one thing that really, really annoys me. - 08/09/2010 09:26:23 PM 1021 Views
Don't watch vampire programmes? - 08/09/2010 09:42:33 PM 741 Views
But ... I have to. - 08/09/2010 09:45:51 PM 712 Views
Because TV shows about vampires are usually not concerned about science? *NM* - 08/09/2010 10:07:53 PM 289 Views
But why? - 08/09/2010 10:09:33 PM 652 Views
Combination of both, probably. - 08/09/2010 10:25:01 PM 694 Views
"I may be dead, but I'm still pretty!" - 08/09/2010 10:18:43 PM 762 Views
Indeed. - 08/09/2010 10:20:58 PM 753 Views
Re: Indeed. - 08/09/2010 10:30:32 PM 712 Views
Re: Indeed. - 08/09/2010 10:36:19 PM 742 Views
Re: Indeed. - 08/09/2010 10:49:55 PM 753 Views
Re: Indeed. - 08/09/2010 10:57:01 PM 814 Views
Re: Indeed. - 08/09/2010 11:49:49 PM 709 Views
Re: Indeed. - 09/09/2010 08:52:43 AM 777 Views
Also - 08/09/2010 10:46:35 PM 663 Views
Yes. - 08/09/2010 10:51:31 PM 618 Views
Re: Yes. - 08/09/2010 10:57:34 PM 661 Views
She's mostly okay when she's actually herself. - 08/09/2010 11:10:33 PM 687 Views
Re: She's mostly okay when she's actually herself. - 08/09/2010 11:13:59 PM 724 Views
I so agree. - 08/09/2010 11:44:21 PM 704 Views
Re: I so agree. - 09/09/2010 08:45:35 AM 721 Views
Re: I so agree. - 09/09/2010 09:55:34 AM 616 Views
Pft - 08/09/2010 10:39:47 PM 745 Views
- 08/09/2010 10:40:52 PM 694 Views
Ah. - 08/09/2010 11:18:08 PM 705 Views
The lack of body heat is another trait I find annoying. - 09/09/2010 12:12:15 AM 725 Views
Re: The lack of body heat is another trait I find annoying. - 09/09/2010 08:55:21 AM 725 Views
Re: The lack of body heat is another trait I find annoying. - 09/09/2010 11:33:41 PM 672 Views
Re: The lack of body heat is another trait I find annoying. - 09/09/2010 02:21:54 PM 882 Views
Re: The lack of body heat is another trait I find annoying. - 09/09/2010 11:35:15 PM 726 Views
Oh, Robert. For whom the cock throbs? It throbs for thee. - 10/09/2010 02:31:16 AM 739 Views
Re: Oh, Robert. For whom the cock throbs? It throbs for thee. - 10/09/2010 03:10:14 AM 922 Views
- 10/09/2010 04:48:14 AM 851 Views
TV and the movies tend to treat scfi and fantasy like this all the time - 09/09/2010 06:30:42 PM 651 Views
Thankfully I have yet to see Avatar. *NM* - 09/09/2010 06:32:46 PM 328 Views
it is pretty - 09/09/2010 09:44:41 PM 643 Views
And... - 09/09/2010 09:37:04 PM 686 Views
Re: And... - 10/09/2010 12:54:52 AM 594 Views

Reply to Message