I'm thinking you'd be really, really, really confused. It might be a bit like surrealist art.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 16/11/2010 06:04:37 PM
At least if this movie is anything like the previous ones - Ghav's review does suggest this is more focused and coherent, and so perhaps it's not as necessary here to have read the books.
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part One (spoiler-free)
- 15/11/2010 07:05:18 PM
2038 Views
Free?
- 15/11/2010 07:37:31 PM
890 Views
I figure it's fair. I mean, the universe has to make up for you being you sometimes, right? 
- 15/11/2010 10:28:46 PM
995 Views
- 15/11/2010 10:28:46 PM
995 Views
Sorry, I can't hear you over everyone in the theater talking before the film. 
- 15/11/2010 11:47:11 PM
948 Views
- 15/11/2010 11:47:11 PM
948 Views
...If my friends and I can get a seat. Holy crap is this line long. *NM*
- 15/11/2010 11:18:02 PM
546 Views
*NM*
*NM*
Hah, well, that subtext is probably a good thing (spoilers)
- 16/11/2010 02:24:13 PM
1084 Views
Yeah, but unfortunately it just comes off as being really out of nowhere.
- 16/11/2010 05:29:26 PM
934 Views
I am sooooo over HP. I'll probably wait a week for the fan-storm to blow over, or wait 'till dvd.
- 16/11/2010 03:43:27 PM
1047 Views
NSSP: So?
- 16/11/2010 05:50:53 PM
828 Views
I'm thinking you'd be really, really, really confused. It might be a bit like surrealist art.
- 16/11/2010 06:04:37 PM
956 Views
But the 7th book relies so heavily on the 6th, it would be pretty impossible.
- 16/11/2010 08:29:28 PM
1090 Views
You ought to read or watch them just for their cultural relevance.
- 16/11/2010 08:30:45 PM
1026 Views
- 16/11/2010 08:30:45 PM
1026 Views
I see the , but serioiusly, I don't think I need to.
- 17/11/2010 05:53:27 PM
912 Views
, but serioiusly, I don't think I need to.
- 17/11/2010 05:53:27 PM
912 Views
It's about as influential as Star Wars, which I guess depends on how influential you think SW is.
- 17/11/2010 09:23:55 PM
946 Views
That seems a bit early to say - wait till twenty years have passed, then check again. *NM*
- 18/11/2010 03:46:24 PM
552 Views
Fair enough, but I think we're already seeing its influence on children's literature. *NM*
- 19/11/2010 08:41:51 PM
583 Views
Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part One (spoiler-free)
- 18/11/2010 11:02:29 AM
983 Views
didn't like 3/5 for me
- 21/11/2010 12:57:59 AM
1064 Views
I'm glad it's 2 films, but the total run time could be 4 hours instead of 5 hours *NM*
- 21/11/2010 07:15:54 AM
527 Views
i guess even with severe editing one film would have ran for 4 hours
- 22/11/2010 11:53:13 AM
938 Views
the dance was one of the best scenes in the film, imo. *NM*
- 22/11/2010 07:09:26 PM
523 Views
Yeah, I really liked it.
- 22/11/2010 08:10:08 PM
901 Views
Re: Yeah, I really liked it.
- 23/11/2010 10:20:26 PM
874 Views
yes, but we can't have CHARACTERIZATION!!!
- 24/11/2010 06:55:39 AM
840 Views
it wasn't characterisation, it was horribly awkward and clumsily crowbarred in
- 25/11/2010 01:15:20 AM
800 Views
*shrug* I liked the scene. It was something lighthearted in the middle of a lot of bleakness
- 25/11/2010 01:43:14 AM
858 Views
I was against the idea of splitting it when that was first announced
- 29/11/2010 03:02:27 PM
912 Views
Wow. Awesome. Makes it all the sadder how bad the others were, but oh well.
- 26/11/2010 10:48:35 PM
955 Views
A few more detailed thoughts about why this film blows its predecessors out of the water
- 29/11/2010 02:46:23 PM
1019 Views
One scene they could have made scarier (spoilers)
- 30/11/2010 05:16:42 PM
977 Views
oh I dunno...
- 01/12/2010 08:25:20 AM
966 Views
I for one cannot WAIT for the Bellatrix vs Molly Weasley showdown. Gonna be epic! Best scene in book *NM*
- 05/12/2010 07:41:53 AM
531 Views