I'm thinking you'd be really, really, really confused. It might be a bit like surrealist art.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 16/11/2010 06:04:37 PM
At least if this movie is anything like the previous ones - Ghav's review does suggest this is more focused and coherent, and so perhaps it's not as necessary here to have read the books.
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part One (spoiler-free)
- 15/11/2010 07:05:18 PM
2089 Views
Free?
- 15/11/2010 07:37:31 PM
929 Views
I figure it's fair. I mean, the universe has to make up for you being you sometimes, right? 
- 15/11/2010 10:28:46 PM
1054 Views
- 15/11/2010 10:28:46 PM
1054 Views
Sorry, I can't hear you over everyone in the theater talking before the film. 
- 15/11/2010 11:47:11 PM
995 Views
- 15/11/2010 11:47:11 PM
995 Views
...If my friends and I can get a seat. Holy crap is this line long. *NM*
- 15/11/2010 11:18:02 PM
564 Views
*NM*
*NM*
Hah, well, that subtext is probably a good thing (spoilers)
- 16/11/2010 02:24:13 PM
1124 Views
Yeah, but unfortunately it just comes off as being really out of nowhere.
- 16/11/2010 05:29:26 PM
977 Views
I am sooooo over HP. I'll probably wait a week for the fan-storm to blow over, or wait 'till dvd.
- 16/11/2010 03:43:27 PM
1095 Views
NSSP: So?
- 16/11/2010 05:50:53 PM
877 Views
I'm thinking you'd be really, really, really confused. It might be a bit like surrealist art.
- 16/11/2010 06:04:37 PM
1001 Views
But the 7th book relies so heavily on the 6th, it would be pretty impossible.
- 16/11/2010 08:29:28 PM
1147 Views
You ought to read or watch them just for their cultural relevance.
- 16/11/2010 08:30:45 PM
1076 Views
- 16/11/2010 08:30:45 PM
1076 Views
I see the , but serioiusly, I don't think I need to.
- 17/11/2010 05:53:27 PM
959 Views
, but serioiusly, I don't think I need to.
- 17/11/2010 05:53:27 PM
959 Views
It's about as influential as Star Wars, which I guess depends on how influential you think SW is.
- 17/11/2010 09:23:55 PM
993 Views
That seems a bit early to say - wait till twenty years have passed, then check again. *NM*
- 18/11/2010 03:46:24 PM
572 Views
Fair enough, but I think we're already seeing its influence on children's literature. *NM*
- 19/11/2010 08:41:51 PM
601 Views
Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part One (spoiler-free)
- 18/11/2010 11:02:29 AM
1053 Views
didn't like 3/5 for me
- 21/11/2010 12:57:59 AM
1109 Views
I'm glad it's 2 films, but the total run time could be 4 hours instead of 5 hours *NM*
- 21/11/2010 07:15:54 AM
550 Views
i guess even with severe editing one film would have ran for 4 hours
- 22/11/2010 11:53:13 AM
983 Views
the dance was one of the best scenes in the film, imo. *NM*
- 22/11/2010 07:09:26 PM
547 Views
Yeah, I really liked it.
- 22/11/2010 08:10:08 PM
939 Views
Re: Yeah, I really liked it.
- 23/11/2010 10:20:26 PM
926 Views
yes, but we can't have CHARACTERIZATION!!!
- 24/11/2010 06:55:39 AM
880 Views
it wasn't characterisation, it was horribly awkward and clumsily crowbarred in
- 25/11/2010 01:15:20 AM
843 Views
*shrug* I liked the scene. It was something lighthearted in the middle of a lot of bleakness
- 25/11/2010 01:43:14 AM
905 Views
I was against the idea of splitting it when that was first announced
- 29/11/2010 03:02:27 PM
958 Views
Wow. Awesome. Makes it all the sadder how bad the others were, but oh well.
- 26/11/2010 10:48:35 PM
991 Views
A few more detailed thoughts about why this film blows its predecessors out of the water
- 29/11/2010 02:46:23 PM
1077 Views
One scene they could have made scarier (spoilers)
- 30/11/2010 05:16:42 PM
1027 Views
oh I dunno...
- 01/12/2010 08:25:20 AM
1007 Views
I for one cannot WAIT for the Bellatrix vs Molly Weasley showdown. Gonna be epic! Best scene in book *NM*
- 05/12/2010 07:41:53 AM
558 Views