I'm thinking you'd be really, really, really confused. It might be a bit like surrealist art.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 16/11/2010 06:04:37 PM
At least if this movie is anything like the previous ones - Ghav's review does suggest this is more focused and coherent, and so perhaps it's not as necessary here to have read the books.
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part One (spoiler-free)
- 15/11/2010 07:05:18 PM
2348 Views
Free?
- 15/11/2010 07:37:31 PM
1125 Views
I figure it's fair. I mean, the universe has to make up for you being you sometimes, right? 
- 15/11/2010 10:28:46 PM
1295 Views
- 15/11/2010 10:28:46 PM
1295 Views
Sorry, I can't hear you over everyone in the theater talking before the film. 
- 15/11/2010 11:47:11 PM
1198 Views
- 15/11/2010 11:47:11 PM
1198 Views
...If my friends and I can get a seat. Holy crap is this line long. *NM*
- 15/11/2010 11:18:02 PM
663 Views
*NM*
*NM*
Hah, well, that subtext is probably a good thing (spoilers)
- 16/11/2010 02:24:13 PM
1337 Views
Yeah, but unfortunately it just comes off as being really out of nowhere.
- 16/11/2010 05:29:26 PM
1216 Views
I am sooooo over HP. I'll probably wait a week for the fan-storm to blow over, or wait 'till dvd.
- 16/11/2010 03:43:27 PM
1298 Views
NSSP: So?
- 16/11/2010 05:50:53 PM
1080 Views
I'm thinking you'd be really, really, really confused. It might be a bit like surrealist art.
- 16/11/2010 06:04:37 PM
1233 Views
But the 7th book relies so heavily on the 6th, it would be pretty impossible.
- 16/11/2010 08:29:28 PM
1362 Views
You ought to read or watch them just for their cultural relevance.
- 16/11/2010 08:30:45 PM
1274 Views
- 16/11/2010 08:30:45 PM
1274 Views
I see the , but serioiusly, I don't think I need to.
- 17/11/2010 05:53:27 PM
1155 Views
, but serioiusly, I don't think I need to.
- 17/11/2010 05:53:27 PM
1155 Views
It's about as influential as Star Wars, which I guess depends on how influential you think SW is.
- 17/11/2010 09:23:55 PM
1215 Views
That seems a bit early to say - wait till twenty years have passed, then check again. *NM*
- 18/11/2010 03:46:24 PM
676 Views
Fair enough, but I think we're already seeing its influence on children's literature. *NM*
- 19/11/2010 08:41:51 PM
700 Views
Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part One (spoiler-free)
- 18/11/2010 11:02:29 AM
1296 Views
didn't like 3/5 for me
- 21/11/2010 12:57:59 AM
1351 Views
I'm glad it's 2 films, but the total run time could be 4 hours instead of 5 hours *NM*
- 21/11/2010 07:15:54 AM
655 Views
i guess even with severe editing one film would have ran for 4 hours
- 22/11/2010 11:53:13 AM
1181 Views
the dance was one of the best scenes in the film, imo. *NM*
- 22/11/2010 07:09:26 PM
662 Views
Yeah, I really liked it.
- 22/11/2010 08:10:08 PM
1158 Views
Re: Yeah, I really liked it.
- 23/11/2010 10:20:26 PM
1125 Views
yes, but we can't have CHARACTERIZATION!!!
- 24/11/2010 06:55:39 AM
1089 Views
it wasn't characterisation, it was horribly awkward and clumsily crowbarred in
- 25/11/2010 01:15:20 AM
1036 Views
*shrug* I liked the scene. It was something lighthearted in the middle of a lot of bleakness
- 25/11/2010 01:43:14 AM
1097 Views
I was against the idea of splitting it when that was first announced
- 29/11/2010 03:02:27 PM
1184 Views
Wow. Awesome. Makes it all the sadder how bad the others were, but oh well.
- 26/11/2010 10:48:35 PM
1202 Views
A few more detailed thoughts about why this film blows its predecessors out of the water
- 29/11/2010 02:46:23 PM
1320 Views
One scene they could have made scarier (spoilers)
- 30/11/2010 05:16:42 PM
1228 Views
oh I dunno...
- 01/12/2010 08:25:20 AM
1190 Views
I for one cannot WAIT for the Bellatrix vs Molly Weasley showdown. Gonna be epic! Best scene in book *NM*
- 05/12/2010 07:41:53 AM
671 Views