Active Users:601 Time:24/04/2026 12:25:30 PM
The Borgias should be called "The Tudors II" Tirenne Send a noteboard - 02/05/2011 07:22:38 PM
IT's not as bad as I expected it to be, but at the same time, it isn't that good either. Something is just off about it. I'll keep watching it when I have the chance though. Unlike "The Borgias" I am still interested in seeing more of it. The Borgias should have been better than it has turned out to be, with Jeremy Irons playing Rodrigo, one would think it would be quality television, its not :(


Sadly, not even Jeremy Irons acting with all his might can save a lame story line and predictable writing.



This time with even more sex and intrigue. And sex. Its also in Italy. Did we mention the sex?
Reply to message
Has anyone been watching Camelot? - 30/04/2011 05:20:11 PM 884 Views
Heh, heh, boobies! - 30/04/2011 06:20:48 PM 622 Views
That's what really pisses me off too - 01/05/2011 11:01:45 AM 598 Views
I agree with you about Arthur - 02/05/2011 07:20:32 PM 711 Views
I've seen the first few episodes - 30/04/2011 06:30:51 PM 604 Views
Yes, the Borgias was disappointing. - 01/05/2011 08:56:52 PM 595 Views
The Borgias should be called "The Tudors II" - 02/05/2011 07:22:38 PM 780 Views
In fairness, sex IS what the Borgias are known for... *NM* - 02/05/2011 10:05:57 PM 218 Views
Eva Green and James Purefoy... interesting. - 01/05/2011 01:03:33 PM 784 Views

Reply to Message