Didn't really want to start a new thread for this, but can someone tell me why after spending the entire story telling us that gangers have the right to live, it's okay for the Doctor to just disintegrates Amy's ganger at the end?
I think the reason the Doctor went there was to study the Flesh and realised that while the gangers were life forms in their own right, Flesh Amy wasn't - it had no mind of its own but was just Amy's projected into it so he was safe to destroy it.
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
/Doctor Who: I object! -no spoilers
- 28/05/2011 04:17:28 PM
909 Views
The whole point of a cliffhanger... *Spoilers*
- 28/05/2011 07:42:34 PM
726 Views
Also don't go anywhere near the Dr Who site if you don't want next week spoiled.
- 28/05/2011 07:45:05 PM
687 Views
Re: The whole point of a cliffhanger... *Spoilers*
- 29/05/2011 02:08:44 AM
731 Views
Re: The whole point of a cliffhanger... *Spoilers*
- 29/05/2011 03:19:35 PM
666 Views
Re: The whole point of a cliffhanger... *Spoilers*
- 29/05/2011 03:25:02 PM
687 Views
Ahhh. Well the BBC are now advertising the spoiler trailer on TV so you can't avoid it.
- 29/05/2011 03:43:17 PM
637 Views
Then again, I guess they have to do something to drag people back in
- 29/05/2011 03:49:51 PM
696 Views
*Spoilers* - Question about this episode
- 02/06/2011 09:11:51 AM
676 Views
Different technology
- 02/06/2011 12:23:45 PM
681 Views