Active Users:1658 Time:06/10/2025 12:11:33 AM
I agree on the red herring ... Roonas Send a noteboard - 29/07/2011 07:53:07 PM
EDIT - It is also possible that eyepatch lady is an older version of a previous incarnation of River, and that once defeated she regenerates into the Alex Kingston River that we know. But that doesn't necessarily explain Alex Kingston River wearing the eyepatch.


due to the armored monster playing chess having one too ...

We never saw the completion to the little girls regen at the end of IA/DotM ... we know she had not necessarily done anything other than shoot the light from her face and hands as per usual, but the height didn't seem to adjust while still on her in the shot. So there is a million miles of room for Moffat to work his magic here - he's got a whole new breed of time-lord-esque weird crazy scenarios he can take to bring her plot to conclusion. I still believe it more likely that River is not the Eye-patch lady in any incarnation, merely that they all wear the pieces for some more practical/sinister reason as a group.

I really can't wait to see where he takes the direction for the show, because for writing purposes ... a round/circular writing style for your plot requires soooooo much work ...and yet he still leaves so much room for himself ... I gotta applaud their efforts to date.

Lookin' forward to his resolution,

-Roon
-Roonas.

*MySmiley*
This message last edited by Roonas on 29/07/2011 at 07:54:37 PM
Reply to message
New Doctor Who trailer - 24/07/2011 11:16:41 PM 572 Views
The big reveal: - 24/07/2011 11:27:14 PM 559 Views
I think it's a red herring. - 25/07/2011 04:50:49 AM 382 Views
I agree on the red herring ... - 29/07/2011 07:53:07 PM 382 Views
You're likely correct. - 29/07/2011 08:25:10 PM 341 Views
To that I say: - 02/08/2011 11:20:48 PM 483 Views
CANNOT WAIT - 25/07/2011 04:54:44 AM 383 Views
Me either ... - 29/07/2011 07:56:05 PM 376 Views
I paused the trailer a few times ... - 29/07/2011 07:38:46 PM 375 Views

Reply to Message