Active Users:202 Time:20/05/2024 07:20:19 PM
I think there's precedent in the shift of filmed drama to an episodic format. Dan Send a noteboard - 08/09/2011 02:57:57 PM
How do you break down "The Godfather" into 10-13 chunks to show over the course of three to four months? This evolution of short-season TV shows that seems to have blurred the line between "series" and "mini-series" appears to have expanded the movie into a giant story. This is what to the surprising (to me, anyway) success of "Game of Thrones." A novel far too long and dense to be properly adapted into a movie was very well adapted into a TV show (and as a fan of the Godfather novel, I am now forced to wonder what could have been if they had been able to use the cable TV season format, rather than limit it to the truncated film adaptation, that is nonetheless extremely long for a feature film). However, the key point here is that now that they have finally found the right visual format to showcase a decent-sized novel, they are just doing what has already been done for a couple of years - tell a dense, character-and-plot-driven story with a full, drawn-out treatment, but as a result, we have to look at these TV seasons as a complete work, rather than a collection of individual stories.

A season of "Modern Family," one of the few network shows I still follow as closely as the shows I discuss here, seems like an anthology of humorous short stories, compared to the series of novels that are the seasons of Sons of Anarchy and Dexter. But you can't read a novel in bite-size chunks as stand-alone works. How satisfied would GRRM or RJ readers have been with a monthly novel detailing a couple of events of the greater stories of their novels? Actually, given some of the former's delays, they might have been happier, but the chopping of the latest novels of each writer's series into more than one book has definitely had an adverse effect on the creative success (and by the torpor of the WoTMB, the fan interest as well) of those works. ToM & AFfC might have been the worst individual books of their respective series, but with each one, there is some hope for the overall product, given the thematic connections visible with tGS & DWD, respectively. That is, I believe the dilemma for the individual episodes of the modern cable TV show (Or at least the ones on FX & the premium networks, not the USA, SyFy & TBS fare which imitates the patterns of network programing much more closely). We are no longer getting a series of stories with a thematic connection or unity, we are getting bits and pieces of a greater work, which are too interdependent to fully appreciate on their own. Watching them as a whole on DVD or TiVoing them until the end of the season might very well be the solution to properly experiencing the story.



I think Aristotle pointed out one of the major distinctions between Epic and Tragedy was that Epic was a story told over many days, while tragedy was a story told in only one day. Also, a number of very popular novels were published in installments too, right? I'm thinking of Dickens primarily, but weren't portions of Tolstoy's as well to an extent? I think great cinema can be given episodically, though certain changes would have to be made. As above, there is precedent in other media. What did you think of The Sopranos? I think that's a decent example.

It might well have been that 100 years ago it was a major change to go in the other direction, from episodic installments to a large chunk of text. I could see converse problem floated about overly bloated walls of text that are not accountable to keep pace or structure or interest on a smaller scale. The later Jordan and (arguably) the later Martin could be cited as examples.

So, I think there is precedent in sort of global, formal aesthetic shifts for a medium, though it is new for film. A few of my friends in the movie industry seem to be recognizing this as well. I agree with the problems you pointed out above, though, having watched both series in both formats (particular Dexter's problems). I think what those issues are though are actually just the growing pains of writers and directors adapting to the form of their medium. I'm betting they'll come up less and less. Of course, the directions they take to even the problems out would differ per the series. One series could decide to increase the episodic fidelity or self-sufficiency of each episode, while another could decide to emphasize the deferential character of each episode as part of a season, so as not to frustrate viewers with repeated McGuffin reaches. If that makes sense.
Reply to message
Watching cable shows - should you just wait for the DVDs? - 05/09/2011 04:17:59 AM 811 Views
I can't speak for these shows, but - 05/09/2011 02:30:19 PM 569 Views
I don't understand the concept of owning shows/movies. - 05/09/2011 03:33:27 PM 512 Views
I guess you either get it or you don't - 05/09/2011 03:49:14 PM 569 Views
I agree with you. - 05/09/2011 04:18:21 PM 547 Views
Some people like to watch shows multiple times. I am one of them. - 05/09/2011 07:40:43 PM 575 Views
Owning books. - 10/09/2011 05:23:36 PM 476 Views
Just watched Dexter season 5 via Netflix.....not buying it. - 05/09/2011 09:13:33 PM 688 Views
Yeah, you pretty much don't agree with me at all. - 06/09/2011 02:48:39 AM 451 Views
I don't think you necessarily need to WAIT for the DVDs - 06/09/2011 01:43:11 AM 454 Views
There are pros and cons, I think - 06/09/2011 03:44:52 PM 531 Views
I know what you mean. - 07/09/2011 09:46:51 PM 475 Views
Breaking Bad! - 07/09/2011 10:09:14 PM 471 Views
Re: Breaking Bad! - 07/09/2011 10:35:07 PM 541 Views
Re: Breaking Bad! - 08/09/2011 11:58:42 AM 522 Views
Re: Breaking Bad! *spoiler time now!* - 08/09/2011 01:50:49 PM 514 Views
Yes. Exactly. - 12/09/2011 01:24:10 AM 635 Views
Netflix serves the same purpose, as far as I'm concerned. - 07/09/2011 09:48:44 PM 487 Views
I think there's precedent in the shift of filmed drama to an episodic format. - 08/09/2011 02:57:57 PM 552 Views

Reply to Message