However, you are correct that you can differentiate between plot and storytelling, and if you're talking about pure storytelling style with no regard to the plot behind it, then yeah, that was fairly well done. As I said, I liked the movie quite a bit. I'm a fan. But damn, I could use a sturdier plot.
I am not disagreeing with the plot could be much better.
Yet I believed the Star Trek reboot is a good movie, and a good reboot movie.
While there are problems with the plot/plotholes things the movie did right.
1) Good actors with some memorable lines and believable performances
2) Good rhythm to the story with a nice flair to the storytelling. It did get a little too slow with the hoth/spot prime bit, but it succeeded better than most movies
3) Great music that enhanced the movie
Yes the plot could have been more tight, but in my mind it was a very good movie. Lastly with literature let alone sci-fi and fantasy I believe you can do a suspension of belief and for the most part ignore some blarring plot holes such as eagles dropping off Frodo to Mt. Doom, to use a fantasy example.
Khan is IN (but Benicio Del Toro is OUT) as Star Trek 2's villain
- 06/12/2011 02:58:08 PM
1353 Views
ST2
- 06/12/2011 04:34:40 PM
897 Views
Wha?!?
- 07/12/2011 12:06:49 AM
737 Views
Yes and no.
- 07/12/2011 05:42:43 PM
854 Views
I am curious, what aspects of the movie were poor story telling? *NM*
- 07/12/2011 06:23:35 PM
298 Views
Well.
- 07/12/2011 08:00:20 PM
767 Views
My responses
- 08/12/2011 05:38:26 AM
727 Views
Re: My responses
- 08/12/2011 03:37:18 PM
793 Views
Re: My responses
- 08/12/2011 04:21:30 PM
688 Views
*NM*
Wait a minute! Could Khan possibly be...
- 06/12/2011 06:45:07 PM
908 Views
The only thing I liked Del Toro in was "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas", so no big loss.
- 06/12/2011 06:54:38 PM
657 Views
I liked him in The Usual Suspects
- 06/12/2011 11:57:27 PM
746 Views
I don't even usually remember he was in that. He just didn't stand out. *NM*
- 07/12/2011 02:20:12 AM
311 Views
*NM*