Active Users:1488 Time:24/12/2025 11:04:27 AM
Re: Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. dacole Send a noteboard - 07/05/2012 08:35:53 AM
It'd be like having Batman and never once showing the Batcave or Batmobile. You could do it and get away with it, but fans would whine.

I do wonder if by showing how easily it was almost taken out and having Banner go on about how it submerging would be cooler, that Whedon wasn't lampshading the lunacy of the concept and explaining why he won't use it in the future. Maybe in THE AVENGERS 2 (or the next time SHIELD shows up) they'll have a Sub-Carrier instead?


I suspect you are right. Whedon does things like that...and yes a submersible carrier now THAT would be badass.
Reply to message
I'm pleased to report The Avengers offered both entertainment AND justification (spoilers seperated) - 05/05/2012 04:33:39 AM 1576 Views
Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 05/05/2012 04:34:45 AM 1055 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 05/05/2012 08:29:33 AM 1213 Views
You guys are weird. - 06/05/2012 03:59:15 PM 889 Views
You're wierd - 06/05/2012 07:21:04 PM 805 Views
I know. - 07/05/2012 03:27:05 AM 782 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 07/05/2012 08:34:18 AM 856 Views
Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. - 05/05/2012 01:17:58 PM 802 Views
Re: Yup, they couldn't get away with not having the Heli-Carrier. - 07/05/2012 08:35:53 AM 843 Views
Einstein would have made a lot more sense... - 05/05/2012 02:23:46 PM 855 Views
Nah - 06/05/2012 03:46:21 PM 832 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 02:09:08 AM 755 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 03:31:47 AM 840 Views
Re: Nah - 07/05/2012 11:19:54 PM 850 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 06/05/2012 03:51:23 PM 878 Views
True - 06/05/2012 06:06:26 PM 812 Views
Re: Spoilers about archery, aircraft carriers etc - 06/05/2012 07:17:20 PM 889 Views
Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird - 07/05/2012 06:26:26 PM 934 Views
Re: Yeah, Black Widow's reaction was a little... weird - 08/05/2012 01:21:24 PM 837 Views
Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. - 09/05/2012 02:22:08 PM 781 Views
Re: Not really, that is the nature of The Hulk. - 09/05/2012 03:13:53 PM 790 Views
It depends on which interpretation of the Hulk they are running with. - 14/05/2012 01:50:44 PM 819 Views
Haven't you missed the point of the helicarrier? - 07/05/2012 09:18:31 PM 790 Views
When you say six movies, are you counting both Hulk movies? *NM* - 05/05/2012 01:22:50 PM 460 Views
Yes *NM* - 06/05/2012 07:03:22 PM 376 Views
I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 03:14:34 PM 785 Views
Re: I thought the disparate power levels were unintentionally hilarious (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 11:23:39 PM 1012 Views
Hawkeye does basically state as much to Black Widow. They're made for a spy movie. - 14/05/2012 11:20:53 PM 803 Views
??? - 15/05/2012 01:36:39 AM 753 Views
What was up with the Hulk? (spoilers) - 07/05/2012 06:35:06 PM 873 Views
I think it's just one of the many many plot holes. - 07/05/2012 08:20:06 PM 833 Views
There were some. - 08/05/2012 01:56:53 PM 925 Views
In the comics Cap stopped using guns - 14/05/2012 01:57:59 PM 994 Views
On the bank - 08/05/2012 08:32:41 PM 789 Views
Might just be a nod to a classic comic book scene - 09/05/2012 02:25:41 PM 762 Views
The Hulk "spoiler" - 08/05/2012 12:15:54 AM 809 Views
This, plus: - 09/05/2012 12:45:18 PM 911 Views
It's an id thing. - 14/05/2012 11:27:19 PM 874 Views
Banner is a trauma induced schizophrenic *NM* - 09/05/2012 02:28:21 PM 400 Views
Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* - 14/05/2012 11:15:12 PM 826 Views
Re: Regarding Coulson's role in the Marvel movies going forward *SPOILERS* - 15/05/2012 01:50:52 AM 781 Views

Reply to Message