That they have known from the beginning where they planned on taking the story. I like to think they have been honest about that.
I have been paying attention. And I know the previous plot lines were shaken up a bit when Peter disappeared. So Bell's actions are based in Dr Bishop's loss of his son, which would not have been there in the previous timeline.
And Jones was allegedly not smart enough to have done it all on his own.
So what was he doing in the first few seasons? What was the point of that?
I am beginning to feel that the first two or three years of the show were wasted time.
I think there having not read other theories, he was trying to do the same thing but in a different way and was not nearly as successful without bell. Now some of these later seasons I think they made up as they went along so yeah its not like they were planning all this from the beginning..would have worked better if they were (like in b5) but not everyone does that unfortunately.
Kirk: Spock, you want to know something? Everybody’s human.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
So, Fringe *spoilers for end of season 4*
- 17/05/2012 09:25:42 AM
745 Views
One of the theories i have read-and that I feel has merit- is...
- 18/05/2012 02:27:06 AM
622 Views
Re: One of the theories i have read-and that I feel has merit- is...
- 18/05/2012 05:14:01 AM
760 Views
But that makes little sense
- 18/05/2012 07:19:01 AM
569 Views
I would need to rewatch, but
- 18/05/2012 02:41:27 PM
651 Views
Walter wrote the book about the coming war in the timeline where he stole Peter.
- 24/05/2012 05:07:04 AM
605 Views
Re: So, Fringe *spoilers for end of season 4*
- 18/05/2012 05:12:02 AM
545 Views
They've said before...
- 18/05/2012 05:17:45 AM
690 Views
B5 actually had to condense its plot to 4 seasons, got renewed, and threw together Season 5.
- 24/05/2012 05:08:04 AM
598 Views