Shrug. He might be the most influential special-effects artist *NM*
beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 10/10/2012 08:43:05 AM
I don't say this because of the effect of Star Wars and Indiana Jones, I say this solely for his creation of Industrial Light and Magic and Skywalker Sound.
I mean, seriously, check out their filmography. They have had a hand in nearly EVERY major special effects movie since Star Wars. The most noticeable exceptions are the first Star Trek motion picture (a mistake Paramount recanted for all the sequels) and the Lord of the Rings trilogy, which was done completely by Weta digital. Given that as Weta digital was being built, it was done with no small amount of consultation with ILM (so says the Director of Weta on the Fellowship of the Rings behinds the scenes stuff) I'd say that's a pretty masterful achievement.
It's a bummer that, as geek film fans, we have for the most part written Lucas off for his Star Wars related sins. Yes, other people have taken his toys and done better with them. But given that he gave us the toys in the first place... wow, right?
I mean, seriously, check out their filmography. They have had a hand in nearly EVERY major special effects movie since Star Wars. The most noticeable exceptions are the first Star Trek motion picture (a mistake Paramount recanted for all the sequels) and the Lord of the Rings trilogy, which was done completely by Weta digital. Given that as Weta digital was being built, it was done with no small amount of consultation with ILM (so says the Director of Weta on the Fellowship of the Rings behinds the scenes stuff) I'd say that's a pretty masterful achievement.
It's a bummer that, as geek film fans, we have for the most part written Lucas off for his Star Wars related sins. Yes, other people have taken his toys and done better with them. But given that he gave us the toys in the first place... wow, right?
I amuse myself.
When the career of George Lucas is reviewed, will he be the most influential film-maker of all time?
- 10/10/2012 12:27:59 AM
1203 Views
Shrug. He might be the most influential special-effects artist *NM*
- 10/10/2012 08:43:05 AM
404 Views
It is going to be the same way with Steve Jobs
- 10/10/2012 02:38:25 PM
833 Views
Steve Jobs shouldn't be remembered for the Apple II, it was Woz's creation.
- 18/10/2012 04:37:38 AM
764 Views
He deserves all the credit he gets, he's a superior artist to his pals Spielberg & Coppola
- 10/10/2012 04:15:29 PM
965 Views
My point is that his greatest contribution is horrifically overlooked.
- 11/10/2012 06:14:53 AM
792 Views
Hell has frozen over
- 11/10/2012 04:31:56 PM
850 Views
I'm going to start making a list of people who say stuff like this to me.
- 12/10/2012 03:48:36 AM
878 Views
That's giving a single man way too much credit and influence, and under the wrong title
- 12/10/2012 01:13:07 AM
849 Views
I'm not sure the OP was saying he was the most influential director
- 12/10/2012 08:34:02 PM
834 Views
Pretty sure I said film-maker. (Checks the Subject line.) Yep, I did. *NM*
- 15/10/2012 05:28:50 AM
433 Views
That's precisely the problem. You said filmmaker, not effects studio owner. *NM*
- 18/10/2012 10:31:26 PM
391 Views
Re: That's precisely the problem. You said filmmaker, not effects studio owner.
- 19/10/2012 03:46:33 PM
836 Views
Short answer, no.
- 15/10/2012 06:19:52 PM
863 Views
So who beats him out?
- 16/10/2012 02:23:19 AM
803 Views
Thats the point, he didn't actually change anything; he demanded that others change things.
- 16/10/2012 02:35:03 PM
931 Views
You have a strange definition of influence.
- 16/10/2012 09:55:59 PM
827 Views
Not really, influence is somthing actively done, his role was too passive.
- 17/10/2012 03:23:40 PM
860 Views
Spielburg, Howard, Coppola, Tarrentino... There is a long list, even only among the modern filmakers *NM*
- 16/10/2012 02:39:28 PM
405 Views
Maybe, no, no, and no. Lucas had a much bigger impact that any of the film-makers .....
- 18/10/2012 04:40:41 AM
780 Views